Why Hindu hearts shouldn’t bleed For Israel

It’s not uncommon to find agitated Hindu nationalists lamenting their government’s stance on all the conflicts that Israel finds itself in. Albeit, very little of this love is based on cold hard strategic thinking and most of it is based on emotional anecdotes. “Iseraal halped India when Kargil dood, read histry bro”, they say. So, let’s do just that.

We aren’t morally beholden to tow the Israeli line on any policy issue out of gratitude for weapons they sell to us, for which we pay the full price. We are a sovereign nation and do what’s best for us. Besides, Jews aren’t some otherworldly saints who have descended upon humanity to talk about marshmallows and bunnies. The Jews are no less hostile to Dharmics than other Abrahamics.

Before we even begin dismantling the security narrative built around Israel being best friend of India(actually Hindus), the bleeding heart Hindus will learn a lot by looking at the famous names of Jews who are bent upon destroying Hinduism from inside. Since they lie at the fountainhead of monotheism, it is no surprise that Jews fill the rank and files of breaking India forces and provide the intellectual armour against Hindu traditions and practices.The Jews believe that they are chosen people and share the same hatred for pagan Hindus like the latter monotheistic derivatives of Christianity and Islam.

Many Hindu nationalists become very attached to Israel for no reason at all and seem to defend Jews no matter what. They seem to have internalized the propaganda by the leading Jewish sympathisers in India like Subramanian Swamy and other US fanboys as if Jews are eternal friends of Hindus. But is there any evidence to suggest that Jews are friends of Hindus? Any empirical analysis around the subject shows no evidence for the same. In fact, if anything Jews have been as negative to Hindus and India as their Abrahamic cousins – Muslims and Christians.

Israeli cafe in India said to only serve white customers

Many Hindus think that since Jews don’t evangelize like the other Abrahamics and because they have suffered under Christians and Muslims just like Hindus, they have an emotional attachment to Jews. This is stupid logic, since by the same logic, British and Mughals fought with each other and hence only a mad man can think that either of them were allies of Hindus. In fact, any unbiased look at evidence of Jewish behaviour against Hindus will show the same negative impact of Jews on Hindus just like their Abrahamic cousins. For instance, almost all of the Hinduphobic Indology, which lays the ideological foundation for most of the Breaking India forces have Jews at their heart. One just has to look at the venom against Hindus and Hinduism spread by Wendy Doninger, Christopher Minkowski, Yigal Bronner or the attempts by Andrey Truschke to white wash the atrocities of Aurangzeb as if it never happened. Imagine the outrage it will cause if a Hindu scholar of Jewish studies released a book saying Hitler never killed Jews and how he is misunderstood. But the point many Hindus miss here is that this is because of the basic polytheism of Hindus vs the monotheism of the Abrahamics, in which Jews lie at the core. Even the Israeli help for our country wasn’t really help but just mutual interest in containing the Islamic enemies which both have and for business reasons and not direct friendship. This is no different than Christian Byzantine empire helping the Islamic forces in Arabia to take out the pagan Persian empire. If not for the existential threat Israel faces from Muslims countries in its neighbourhood, it actually has no reason to befriend India and Hindus other than for business. So it is important for Hindus to drop this unusual and irrational and largely undeserved love they have for Jews and look at the situation from a proper geopolitical perspective and decide objectively the best course of action for Hindus and India.

Given this background, now lets try to understand Modi decided to not visit Israel. This is done with great forethought, not out of some Nehruvian idea of a hipster worldview. Modi was scheduled to visit Israel, making him the first Indian PM, but then suddenly India downgraded the level of diplomatic engagement from PM to MEA, now Sushma Swaraj is going. This change was a result of some hard thinking by India’s security cabinet. It is in our interest that Israel remain under some kind of existential threat from other nations, so that India can retain an elevated position of importance in the eyes of Israel. An Israel that is under no pressure has no obligation to play nice with India, and they might as well start blackmailing us with threats of selling weapons technology to Pakistan, like Russia and France does. The fact that Israel remains under siege impedes them from taking any measures that might alienate India. This status quo favours us.

Israel needs India because the constantly looming threat of India keeps Pakistan from forging any meaningful military alliance with Israel’s enemy, Turkey. It is this threat that makes Israel less likely to double cross us. If the threat from Turkey didn’t exist, Israel would be blackmailing us right now. It is in our interest that the Palestine conflict keeps boiling with no resolution in sight. We encourage both sides (Israel and OPEC) to indulge in a competitive bidding to stay in the good books of India since India is a big strategic buyer for both of them. We maintain an ambiguous stance on Palestine so that both Israel and OPEC keep offering us their respective strategic resources (weapons and oil) at competitive rates in exchange for our diplomatic support for their respective causes in the international forums. If the Palestine conflict is solved, then Israel has nothing to stop it from playing a wider global role and there is a fear that they might start playing the same game that the US plays with us vis-a-vis weapons sales to Pakistan.

Even our so called friend Russia threatened to sell weapons to Pakistan when the recent talks didn’t go as planned and our all weather friend Israel wouldn’t mind even one bit to carry out a false flag terrorist attack in India to ignite a war between India and Pakistan in the hope of selling weapons to India or to keep Pakistan army busy with India while Israel fights a war with Turkey.

That is what makes the situation volatile for us. There should be absolutely no doubt that when Israel decides to go to war with Turkey (or Iran), it will try to provoke a war between India and Pakistan to keep Pakistan engaged in a regional war with India and prevent Pakistan from entering a war to support Turkey (or to prevent India from helping Iran). Last time when Israel was attacked by Arab forces, Pakistani pilots were all over Israeli airspace and shooting them down.

An Israel under siege is good for India. Therefore it is in our interest to shrewdly keep the Palestine pot boiling by supporting both sides as and when it is expedient upon us.

Israeli presence in the Middle East even (especially) with the Palestine turmoil helps our overall security environment. The Palestine issue is a moral flashpoint for Sunni nations like Turkey. If the Palestine issue didn’t exist, Turkey and Israel would have no casus-belli to antagonize each other. If the looming existential threat of a large scale war with Israel didn’t exist, Turkey wouldn’t seek broader military ties with Pakistan and subsequently Israel wouldn’t share military knowhow with India to keep Pakistan tied down. This organic symbiotic relationship makes sure that Israel remains under our fold without having to bribe them or honeytrap them. If the Palestine issue is solved, we lose the favorable status quo and Israel might then start meddling in our affairs to make military sales. They played a devastating role during the LTTE period as well. We can’t guarantee that global security environment wouldn’t deteriorate to those incredible lows again. When that happens, it would be hard to rely exclusively on our economic relationship as a weapons buyer to fend off Israel without having our finger on the Palestine issue. The potential threat of India siding with Turkey on the Palestine issue would amply deter Israel if the security scene in our backyard worsens. For us to be able to exercise that option, the Palestine issue needs to be kept alive.

Let the conflict rage, it is the Muslims who are dying in disproportionate numbers anyway. Besides, what real costs do we incur by simply providing moral and diplomatic support? None. This is a cheap investment with very high returns for us. It would be stupid to give up the Palestinian cause for some cheap sense of right wing thrill.

Besides, Israel is no saint either. Israel itself has switched loyalties multiple times in the past few decades. Now many people know that Israel used to be good friends with Iran up until the 70’s. They even had a joint weapons development program called Project Flower. Guess what the objectives of the program were? To counter Indian nuclear program. Yes, you heard it right.

Israel took Irani oil, money, gave them old weapon and passed details to Iraq/US who later attacked Iran. Iran helps arm Palestine as a payback for Israel backstabbing them for nuclear project. Israel is no saint. It’s not our fight. One also needs to take a look at how Israel’s relations with their other allies have progressed after Israel’s objectives were served. France and Israel were the best of the friends. It is even rumoured (well known) that it was France which supplied nuclear technology and centrifuge technology to Israel in early 60’s and where does Israel-France relation stand today when Israel doesn’t need France any more? Incidentally Israel, France and Britain had made common cause during the Suez Crisis, which was rolled back by US military intervention against the alliance and Israel’s relation with all the involved parties is fraught with distrust and animosity today, including the US. India would face the same fate if we wear our hearts on our sleeve.

Israel today is close allies with Saudi Arabia, which as we all know isn’t exactly India’s best buddy. That has never deterred Israel from cultivating deep military and intelligence ties with the Saudi kingdom, without feeling guilty of offending India. But when India allies itself with Iran to look after its own interests, then it offends the Zionists?

Say what you may about Arab nations, one cannot deny the fact that India gets upwards of 50 Billion USD in remittances from our expats living there. Not to mention the safety and security of the expats themselves, all ~8 million of them, a confrontation with either the Arab states or Iran is not in India’s best interest and yet, Israel wouldn’t bat an eye lid to draw India into a conflict if it serves their interest. They won’t hesitate from tying up with Pakistan and use their soil to wage a covert war against Iran if their revenues from weapon sales to India take a nose dive. There is also the possibility of a greater Israel-Saudi-Pakistan alliance against Iran, which would isolate India and put all our interests at risk, so one needs to think it through before blindly supporting Israel’s position on Palestine simply to spite Indian Muslims in online debates. The diplomatic support India gives to the already dead Palestinian cause is simply flowery lip service and does not require India to commit any of its resources nor does it cost anything. The dividends that it yields in return, in terms of co-operation from Arab states and Iran alike are massive.

So all the bleeding heart Hindus who feel the compulsive obligation to speak up on behalf of Israel in discussions and rename their online profiles into Hindu Zionists should think t̶w̶i̶c̶e̶, or rather just once, before aligning themselves with the star of David. India needs to take strategic decisions in cold blood without any regard for misplaced emotions like “Hindu-Jew Bhai Bhai”.

Image credit:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/20000-march-in-kolkata-in-show-of-support-for-israel/

  • Time Is Up

    Great Article.

    India/Hindus need to keep their interest above everything and have cards to deal in its own interest. At the end, no-one wants to deal with anyone who does not have a bargaining chip. For that Hindus need to be strong and promote and maintain say in global events.
    Right now India (land of Hindus) is looked either as “Gandhi nation” or “Nation with caste wars” or “Hindu Nationalist”, all 3 are negative a way to put Hindus on defensive in international forums.

    Why not nation which “Resilient Nation” or “Nation of Hindu Patriots?”. Hindus should not be burdened with MKG’s non-violence crap!

    Humnay Ahimsa Ka Thekaa Nahi Liyaa.

  • Barbaric Opinion

    Good article.

  • Pingback: Hindu-Jew Bye Bhai – YugaParivartan()

  • Rekha Iyyer

    You have written, //Israel is a close ally of Saudi Arabia// , are you sure? That sounds weird. As far as my understanding goes, Saudi is against Israel, even the Israeli citizens are banned from entering Saudi. The same goes with Pakistan. All teh Islamic nations HATE Israel. There is no way that bond is ever fostering between them. I would rather believe that sun has started revolving around earth- this sounds more believable to me than the Israel-Ismalists alliance.

    • anonymouse123
      • Anfauglir

        Sunnis don’t consider Shiites as muslims (and vice-versa), and they have long conspired genocide against them. (Where’s the surprise? Pakistani Sunnis regularly murder Shias all the time too. And the same Sunni muslims attacks on Shia muslims have occured in India too.)

        Several Sunni muslims nations have conspired against Shiite Iran and Shiiite-heavy Iraq in collusion with their traditional enemies (usually America), but that doesn’t mean that Sunni Arabs love any of their kufr enemies (such as America etc) whom they still plan to destroy in their turn.

        It’s long been Iran vs the rest of the islamic nations. It’s well-known.

  • si91

    What a poorly though out article.

    1) “The Jews are no less hostile to Dharmics than other Abrahamics”

    This is the central premise of the article, yet the author presents no evidence whatsoever that “the Jews” as a whole, let alone the Israelis, are hostile to Dharmics at all.

    2) “Since they lie at the fountainhead of monotheism, it is no surprise that Jews fill the rank and files of breaking India forces and provide the intellectual armour against Hindu traditions and practices.The Jews believe that they are chosen people and share the same hatred for pagan Hindus like the latter
    monotheistic derivatives of Christianity and Islam.”

    The problem here is that the author doesn’t connect the two ideas expressed in these sentences. There may be Jews who provide the intellectual armor against Hindu traditions or practices, yet the author provides no
    evidence that the Jewish religion itself is the prime motivator behind this sentiment. There are plenty of Jews who are ethnically Jewish, and not practicing. What about them? Furthermore, there are also political,
    ethical, and other reasons why people, Jews and non Jews, may be anti-Hindu (for instance, they associate Hindu nationalism with fascism, and oppose it because they dislike fascism, not for religious reasons).

    3) “Many Hindus think that since Jews don’t evangelize like the other Abrahamics and because they have suffered under Christians and Muslims just like Hindus, they have an emotional attachment to Jews. This is stupid logic, since by the same logic, British and Mughals fought with each other and hence only a mad man can think that either of them were allies of Hindus.”

    The difference here is that Jews did not colonize, rule, steal from, or otherwise persecute Hindus
    as the British and Mughals have.

    4) “One just has to look at the venom against Hindus and Hinduism spread by Wendy Doninger, Christopher
    Minkowski, Yigal Bronner or the attempts by Andrey Truschke to white wash the atrocities of Aurangzeb as if it never happened.”

    Aside from Bronner, none of these people are Israeli! And even in Israel, there is diversity of opinion. It is important to note that like in India, Israel also has its own deracinated far left just like India does. For instance,Bronner is clearly part of this group, as he has been scathingly critical of his own country (much like Arundhati Roy, Ram Punyani, Prafull Bidwai, and other deracinated Marxists do in India) and written about it alongside other radical Leftists like Alexander Cockburn and Uri Avnery. This has nothing to do with Judaism or Israel, but with Leftism.

    5) “An Israel that is under no pressure has no obligation to play nice with India, and they might as well start
    blackmailing us with threats of selling weapons technology to Pakistan, like Russia and France does.”

    Why would Israel want to alienate India like this? And how could they sell weapons to Pakistan when
    Pakistan doesn’t even recognize them? Pakistan ethnically cleansed Jews from its country, and Israel is going blackmail India, which protected them?

    6) “We maintain an ambiguous stance on Palestine so that both Israel and OPEC keep offering us their respective strategic resources (weapons and oil) at competitive rates in exchange for our diplomatic support for their respective causes in the international forums.”

    Israel and the oil rich Arab states don’t just give India weapons and oil for India’s toothless diplomatic support. They do it because India pays for them, and this Indian market would exist regardless of what state the Israel-Palestine conflict is in.

    7) “Israel wouldn’t mind even one bit to carry out a false flag terrorist attack in India to ignite a war between India and Pakistan in the hope of selling weapons to India or to keep Pakistan army busy with India while Israel fights a war with Turkey”

    Why on earth would Israel want a war with Turkey?! And why would they need a war between India and Pakistan for India to buy weapons from them? India is already doing that!

    8) “Last time when Israel was attacked by Arab forces, Pakistani pilots were all over Israeli airspace and shooting them down.”

    And yet we are supposed to believe that Israel will sell weapons to Pakistan, country that could easily use them against Israel?

    9)”An Israel under siege is good for India. Therefore it is in our interest to shrewdly keep the Palestine pot boiling by supporting both sides as and when it is expedient upon us.”

    And what if Israel decided to do the same thing regarding India vs Pakistan or India vs China or whatever? If India intentionally makes life difficult for Israel, it has no business whining if Israel returns the favor. This is why India ought to kick the Palestinains to the curb and wholeheartedly support Israel, in exchange for Israel doing the same for India. Being cynical and selfish has consequences.

    10) “It would be stupid to give up the Palestinian cause for some cheap sense of right wing thrill.”

    What exactly does India gain from supporting Palestine? What has Palestine ever done for India? India has wasted millions of rupees propping up this terrorist regime.

    11) “Now many people know that Israel used to be good friends with Iran up until the 70’s. They even had a joint weapons development program called Project Flower. Guess what the objectives of the program were? To counter Indian nuclear program. Yes, you heard it right.”

    Well of course Israel was friends with Iran during this time! This was when Iran was ruled by the pro-West Shah, at a time when “Non-Aligned” India’s relationship with Israel was at its lowest point, when India invited that terrorist Arafat as a state guest! India only has itself to blame for this. It could have built a solid relationship with Israel from 1948 itself. Instead, it allied with Palestinian terrorists, and so Israel, quite rationally, saw India as an ally of its Palestinian enemy. Since then, the Iranians overthrew their Shah and created an Israel-hating theocracy, while India has built up its relationship with Israel since the 1990s. Appropriately, Israel refused to condemn India’s nuclear tests under ABV, and gave crucial assistance during the Kargil War. When India showed a willingness to reconsider its relationship with Israel, Israel responded accordingly.

    12) “France and Israel were the best of the friends. It is even rumoured (well known) that it was France which supplied nuclear technology and centrifuge technology to Israel in early 60’s and where does Israel-France relation stand today when Israel doesn’t need France any more?”

    What? Israel has always had good relations with France, which only declines somewhat when stupid French leaders like Chirac support the Palestinians, not because of some imagined Israeli treachery.

    13) “That has never deterred Israel from cultivating deep military and intelligence ties with the Saudi kingdom, without feeling guilty of offending India.”

    What? Saudi Arabia doesn’t even recognize Israel!

    14) “Say what you may about Arab nations, one cannot deny the fact that India gets upwards of 50 Billion USD in remittances from our expats living there.”

    This isn’t under threat, and certainly isn’t contingent upon Indian support for Palestine. If it were, it would have
    been cut off as soon as India improved relations with Israel in the 1990s. This isn’t a gift to India, it is the product of labor that the Arabs need. They’d lose massively by kicking these people out. If they were willing to lose this much money in the form of increased labor costs over Palestine, they’d have used a few drops of oil wealth to solve the problem decades ago.

    15) “Not to mention the safety and security of the expats themselves, all ~8 million of them”

    …who are relentlessly abused and treated like virtual slave labor!

    16) “The diplomatic support India gives to the already dead Palestinian cause is simply flowery lip service and does not require India to commit any of its resources nor does it cost anything.”

    It has already cost India millions in aid. Furthermore, if this cause is already basically dead, then why would the Arabs, who clearly don’t care, insist upon Indian lip service towards it, and damage their own relationship with India if India refuses to cooperate?

    17) “The dividends that it yields in return, in terms of co-operation from Arab states and Iran alike are massive.”

    There is literally nothing that India gets from the Arab states and Iran that it would no longer get if it kicked the Palestinians to the curb where they belong. The Arabs do not care at all about the Palestinians, who they only see as useful attack dogs against Israel. They will not care if India shows them even less concern. The Palestinian leaders give India nothing, and therefore deserve nothing.

    • Ishan

      1) “The Jews are no less hostile to Dharmics than other Abrahamics”
      Well this statement is true. Why don’t you read the Jewish Talmud?

      “The difference here is that Jews did not colonize, rule, steal from, or otherwise persecute Hindus
      as the British and Mughals have.”
      Your statement is the biggest joke of the first order. German Jewish Rothschild family owned the British East India Company and ruled India till 1947. Not the British Queen or Parliament. Rothschild bankers own the US Federal Reserve, print the US dollar and still control international politics.
      http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-freemasons-and-the-house-of-rothschild/25179

      “This has nothing to do with Judaism or Israel, but with Leftism.”
      You are wrong. Communism is a Jewish philosophy and 80-85% Bolsheviks were Jews.
      http://www.timesofisrael.com/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish/

      “What? Saudi Arabia doesn’t even recognize Israel! ”
      Haha! Saudi Arabia is a very good ally of Israel.
      http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.558512

      • si91

        1) What have Talmud reading Jews ever done to India?

        2) At worst, that is an indictment of the Rothschild family, not all Jews. And the notion that any one group of people can control international politics is laughable, and indeed, the stuff of anti-Jewish conspiracy theories used by the Nazis, and now the Muslim world. Do you even read the news? The world is full of chaos.

        3) Ok, so? This was literally the same justification used by Hitler, who saw Communism as a Jewish plot. Not all Jews are Communists, and in Israel, Communism’s influence is negligible at best. Israel was always an American ally during the Cold War

        4) Sharing a common enemy doesn’t change the fact that Saudi Arabia does not recognize Israel, and indeed exports Jew hating Wahhabism.

        • Ishan

          1) What have Talmud reading Jews ever done to India?
          I can’t believe what I just read. Jew Rothschilds robbed India blind and converted her from the world’s richest nation to a state of penury and still you say this.

          2) It is not laughable mister if you consider the gravity of the situation.
          “Anti-Jewish conspiracy theories”
          Conspiracy theory was a term coined by the CIA in 1967 to mock and discourage genuine truth-seekers and activists. You are doing the same by mocking me.

          3) Communism was a Jewish plot. No one said all Jews are communists but it is a fact that nearly all Communists were Jews.
          My friend , Jews control and milk both sides. Be it Capitalism or Communism. They never put their foot in one boat.

          4) Jew-hating Wahhabism? ROFL
          The ancestor of Al-Sauds was MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE, a Sephardi Jew from Basra who converted to Islam few centuries back. These Sephardi Jews were none other than the tribe of Banu Khainuka, who were expelled by Prophet Mohammad. The Al-Sauds are crypto-Jews. Have you ever seen Saudi Arabia support the Palestinian cause ?
          https://www.facebook.com/notes/hidden-truth/the-jewish-roots-of-the-saudi-royal-family/277683585596093/

          Wee, I don’t trust the main-stream media because they are a bunch of trained professional liars who are funded by the very same globalist bankers I talk about. Their job is to peddle lies. Propaganda is dished out as truth.

          • Anfauglir

            1. “Communism was a Jewish plot.”

            Not only was Marx’s father a convert to Protestantism (so Karl Marx is a second generation christian turned “atheist”), but there was a time early on when christianity happily claimed communism was based on the “Protestant work ethic” (which it was, by the way). Christians only ever remember to accuse communism of being a “Jewish” plot when they don’t like communism anymore. (Capitalism was also proudly proclaimed to be based on the “Protestant work ethic” too, just in case someone thinks I care a tuppence for either.)

            So unless Indian christian convert traitors will in future be collated in a list of “evil Hindus” — and Hinduism gets blamed for Indian christians’ crimes — neither does Karl Marx nor any other ex-Jewish family converted to christianity need to be counted as Jews (nor Judaism or Israel blamed for communism).

            2. “The ancestor of Al-Sauds was MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE”

            Even if true, it remains irrelevant: the ancestors of all muslims were of some other religion or persuasion than islam. So what are you saying? That Hinduism is to blame for Paki muslim terrorists because somewhere in their ancestral tree there was a Hindu?

            3. “Have you ever seen Saudi Arabia support the Palestinian cause”

            Well, the Yom Kippur war where a bunch of surrounding Arab nations ganged up against Israel had Saudi Arabia fighting with fellow islamic nations against Jewish Israelis. You’re not going to pretend otherwise, right, or that this was some “crypto Jewish Saudi plot to conspire with Israel to topple the other Arab nations”? Oh wait, you probably will try. But the rest of us are not so stupid as to believe your (crypto-islamic?) conspiracy theories when the assailants were all known and open about their religion and their hatred for their common enemy: Israel (possibly also its non-muslim status, going by islamic hatred of non-muslims).

            As for Saudi Arabian support for the “Palestinian cause”, I’m sure that privately that consists of more than moral support/praying and condemnation of Israel etc — and may come in the form of dollops of cash, the same kind that Saudi Arabia invests in jihad against India (not just the cause of “islamic” Kashmir).

            Anyway, when it comes to support for actual humanitarian causes, Arab muslim nations outside Saudi Arabia also only go so far as “praying” for their “fellow muslims victimised by ISIS” in Syria and Iraq too, while most take care not to give these refugee status either, leaving western nations to adopt all these “immigrants”.

            Besides, Jordan and Egypt etc could have adopted their kindred “Palestinians” too (or the Syrian refugees for that matter), but largely didn’t either. I guess Jordan and Egypt and every muslim country in the world is actually “crypto-Jewish” too then, by your logic.

            4. “Jew Rothschilds robbed India blind and converted her from the world’s
            richest nation to a state of penury and still you say this.”

            Oh, so the British, Portuguese/other christian tyrants and muslim barbarians didn’t rob India blind, it was all the Jews fault. Let me guess, sneaky Jewish Rothschilds/other Jews rewrote Indian history to blame the muslims and Brits/christian colonists, right? I mean, if there were no Jews, the Brits/Portuguese/other assorted christian invaders and their cousins the muslim invading demons would never have committed genocides against Hindus, right? Let me guess, you’re one of the umpteen online crypto-christian/crypto-muslims going under a Hindu name, considering how you’re indulging in their usual tactic: whitewashing christian and muslim crimes against Hindu India and attempting to blame a third party (this time Jews) for it. Nice try. Not buying.

            But, ah yes, the Rothschilds. Who — as per the usual christian compulsive liars — conveniently morph into having been nazi bankers on one hand, conspiring to genocide their own — since christians now want to whitewash nazism from having been heavily christian, by inventing stories that “Jewish Rothschilds financed the holocaust” (turns out they didn’t, whatever their other crimes) — while on the other hand christians project the Rothschilds as pious Jews whenever christians want to blame Judaism for Rothschilds’ crimes against humanity. So as per christian tactics, Rothschilds are “holocausting anti-Jewish pious Jews” (a mutually exclusive statement by the way, meaning it’s false).

            Even if Rothschilds turn out to have been/be pious Jews, is it their Judaism driving them? Is their goal to implement a conversion of the world to Judaism/some brand of monotheism [1] by means of their global banking and economical activities, or are the Rothschilds just interested in making money by whatever means, even if it means looting and laying waste to other people? Yet, whenever other big industry (pharmaceuticals, etc) try to lay waste
            to “developing nations” too, victimised populations do not try to find
            the “religious” causes behind these actions but simply identify such industries as “capitalist/greedy multinational organisations”. Maybe because many are “British” and American (though often christian).

            [1] Note that there is some extreme Jewish sect — a tiny minority however, though any monotheism can theoretically flare up at any time, admittedly — who wants the non-Jewish world converted to a vegetarian monotheism (but not Judaism, since they don’t recognise
            Goyim as Jews, which they reserve for their ethnic group). In any case, I have not yet heard reports that the Rothschilds are part of this sect of Judaism.

            I don’t give a hoot about the Rothschilds but No, they are not at the top of the list of those who have wronged or are wronging Hindu heathens and Hindu India. Christianity and islam are at the top, followed by anti-Hindu foreign policies of western governments (past/colonial and present).

            That’s not to say that Jews/Judaism have never been anything but positive or neutral to India: apparently Jews came to India and converted some Mizos to Judaism using the earlier inflicted and mischievous western colonial-era christian missionary ploys perpetrated against said Mizos as having alleged Judaic origins/being a “lost Jewish tribe” (Mizos are probably genetically affiliated with East or southeast Asians — and their language is a Sino-Tibetan subgroup — and thus can have no genetic origins in the Middle-East and consequently cannot have been a “middle-eastern tribe” historically, though people who can fall for christianism can fall for anything). The christian missionaries had used this absurd story to convince Mizos to convert to christianity. The Jews merely redirected the story to get more people to settle in the Gaza strip/act as a human buffer against the crazy muslim “palestinian” terrorists. If the Mizos had still been heathen before their conversion to Judaism, this would have been a crime as any missionising. But since most of those Mizos had previously been brainwashed into converting to christianity before their conversion to Judaism in a more recent decade, with some thereafter moving off to Israel besides, it’s (comparatively) better than having christian converts festering in India.

          • Ishan

            ” Let me guess, you’re one of the umpteen online
            crypto-christian/crypto-muslims going under a Hindu name, considering
            how you’re indulging in their usual tactic: whitewashing christian and
            muslim crimes against Hindu India and attempting to blame a third party
            (this time Jews) for it. Nice try. Not buying.”

            This is a frivolous and baseless allegation on your part. And btw, I don’t trust wiki. It is a hasbara Jewish propaganda to spread lies on the Internet.

            Out of three Abrahamic religions, Jews have damaged Hindus the most. Chitpavan Brahmins aka mixture of Bene Israel Jews & local population, in cahoots with the British poisoned Hindu texts and distorted thier meaning to make Hindus self-loathing. Plz go take your spin somewhere else. I don’t have the time to write long replies to clarify every single fact.

          • Anfauglir

            “Chitpavan Brahmins aka mixture of Bene Israel Jews & local population”

            Stop parroting anti-Hindu conspiracies by Ajit Vada-whats-his-face, you anti-Hindu traitor.

            Ethnic Hindus (like Chitpavan Brahmanas, or Namboodiris — another group that that christian-conditioned Ajit invents conspiracies against — or any other Indian Hindu group) are not Jewish by ethnicity or religion, but are ethnically Indian Hindus (heathens). It’s far more likely you’re half-muslim or half-christian something. Why don’t you anti-Hindus who are focused more on Judaism move back to the islamic/christian middle-east where you came from.

          • Ishan

            Anti-semitism is anti-Hinduism. great man! what a conclusion.

            For your info, I do not like any of the three Abrahamic religions. Chitpavans are not ethnic Hindus . So, stop lying and take your spin somewhere else. You are nobody to certify my Hindu credentials. Why should I go to Israel? You go hasbarat troll.

          • Anfauglir

            No, you mental midget. Stop deliberately twisting my words all because you have no proof against them.

            I very clearly said that your and senile Ajit Vadakayil’s (obviously unique) anti-semitism was clearly anti-brahminism and hence anti-Hinduism, because:

            1. you parrot Ajit’s delirium in accusing Chitpavan Brahmins of being “Jews” supposedly scheming against Hinduism.
            2. Anti-brahminism is factually anti-Hinduism. (Though it’s not the only form of anti-Hinduism, being but a subset of all types of anti-Hinduism.)

            Hence your & Ajit’s brand of anti-semitism ARE anti-Hinduism.

            Q.E.D.

            Where did I say all anti-semitism is anti-Hinduism? When it’s very clear to anyone that Ajit and your blind parroting of him invented a whole new anti-semitism, one that is more absurd than any others: since you spun ethnic Hindus (in this case Chitpavan Brahmins) as ethnic Jews instead, and then used anti-semitic propaganda against a Hindu heathen subcommunity and hence against all Hindu heathenism.

            “Chitpavans are not ethnic Hindus”

            – What you claimed first was that they are ethnically Jewish. Prove this lie of yours from genetic papers, or else you and Ajit should commit seppuku for your compulsive lying. Do not repeat the lie again or else it is an admission on your part of being a crypto-monotheist anti-Hindu.

            Chitpavans ARE ethnic Hindus, same as southeast Asian Hindus and any Indic Hindus. Prove otherwise.

            “You are nobody to certify my Hindu credentials.”

            No you terrorist, you are the one who questioned ethnic Hindus’ Hindu credentials (Chitpavan Brahmin Hindu heathens are ethnic Hindu heathens — meaning ancestrally Hindu heathen — same as any other Hindu heathens). Consequently it is natural for all Hindu heathens to doubt and deny you your supposed Hindu credentials. You have none. You have only your poisonous words, which give away your anti-Hinduism.

            “Why should I go to Israel?”

            Who asked you to move to Isreal, you illiterate moron? (Though I don’t actually care where you shuffle off to, so long as you get lost from Bharatam and stay out of any other non-monotheist nation too). But I specifically told you to get lost into the christian-islamic middle-east, and particularly mentioned “Palestine” and ISIS-controlled Syria.
            Why is it you can’t even read, and then dare to instruct others on “facts”?

            And why do you keep insisting on demonstrating to the public that you have no brains and can’t read by continually responding with failed retorts?

            Since you can’t stick to facts, and since you only spew lies against Hindus (else Jews, and the Gods only know who’s next) — even as you never tell the horrific facts about the demonic missionary monotheisms and their adherents — you should now shut up. You’ve made a sufficient fool of yourself. Actually, you ought to commit seppuku for attacking Hindu heathens (in this case Chitpavan Brahmins, and tomorrow no doubt another Hindu community) and for daring to pretend that Hindu texts (starting from the Vedas) could ever be more yours than that of other Hindu heathens. Moreso when it is your alleged “Hindu” status that is in question, not that of other Hindus.

            But thanks for proving yet again — such as by your now detracting from the topic — that you have no verified fact-based sources to support your delirium and that you’ve thus been spewing Mere Lies. The likes of Ajit Vadakayil and you should get lost from all heathenisms and particularly Hinduism for your poisonous lies against Hindu heathenism & its heathens. Your anti-semitism was distasteful, but not a crime against Hindus — hence not a personal offence — but what you’ve since blathered reveals the magnitude of your criminality, since you conspire against the ancestral Vedic religio by your conspiring against any of its loyal adherents that uphold it. You’re as bad as the missionary monotheists. (Thus once more indicating that you must be one yourself.)

          • Ishan

            Calling someone an “anti-semite” for telling the truth is typical of a propagandist. I belong to a family of priests. You don’t even know me personally yet you engage in ad-hominem attacks. My allegiance is to my nation India and not Israel.

          • Anfauglir

            “Calling someone an “anti-semite” for telling the truth is typical of a propagandist”

            a. Peddling anti-brahminism is typical of an anti-Hindu propagandist (usually a cryptomonotheist or someone who’s brainwashed by the monotheist odium against brahmanas. Both spin more lies on the subject thereafter).
            You fit this.

            b. Peddling long debunked conspiracies against Jews is typical of anti-semitism and is an exclusive feature of the missionary monotheisms or someone who has imbibed missionary monotheist propaganda against Jews.
            You fit this.

            c. Peddling the lies of missionary monotheisms (such as against their victim populations) is always a feature of missionary monotheists or those who have internalised their lies.
            From 1 and 2, you fit this.

            In contrast:
            1. My first allegiance is exclusively to the Hindu Gods (hence Hinduism/Vedic religio), and consequently to both a heathen Hindu India and all ethnic, insubvertibly heathen Hindus (thus including heathen Hindu Nepal, southeast Asia etc).

            Whereas I regard all anti-Hindus — which includes (but is not limited to) anti-brahminists — as enemies of my heathenism and a threat to it. You fit as this threat, as I already demonstrated.

            2. I have close affinity with all other heathens of unbroken lineage, e.g. Taoists, Shintoists. Therefore I regard enemies of affiliated heathenisms as my enemies.

            3. I have no qualms with atheists who are not anti-Hindu or anti-heathen and who do not in any way impose on heathenism. And I generally have no issues with any other persons or populations who are not missionary monotheists, and who will live and let live. (Many — not all — modern Jews fit in this last category. From my experience they appear to form the majority.)

            So when I read lies against any of the above 3, I will respond to expose the lies and correct the picture, in the order of importance as listed.

            My allegiances are not in question: I have not violated #1 or #2 — which demonstrates my heathenism — nor have I violated #3, which demonstrates reciprocity to those who will live and let live.

            You on the other hand are a threat to my heathenism, as demonstrated in your violation of #1.

          • Ray

            the other missionary monotheists (christians and Buddhists).

            I think you meant muslims in place of Buddhists.

          • Anfauglir

            Yes, thanks. I’ve corrected it now.

          • Ray

            He is an example of gullible, dhimmi Hindu and seems to be recent acolyte of a conspiracy theorist blogger muslim-apologist/secularist-dhimmi capt chewtyakayil who blames everything on Jews just like muslims and white christians do.

            What I understood of chewtyakayil from reading some of his bullshit is that
            he is a muslim apologist, secularist dhimmi due to being brought up in muslim/communist majority Kerala. He loves Nehru and muslims very much.

            Apparently very similar to many Indians today living in muslim majority states who has developed islamic mindset and adopted pseudo islamic identity due to living alongside and interacting with muslims on daily basis.
            Here is how islamic mindset manifest in dhimmi Hindus: Hate for woman, Hate for dogs(Latest inhumane, shocking, shameful and disgusting attack by Hindus on a Pregnant Dog just because it ate some chickens), Hate for faces stemming from Iconoclasm which ends in acid attacks, Misogynist attitude, Racist attitude towards NE.

            And many dhimmi Hindus who develop this islamic mindset like @disqus_vZYaoaKMFY:disqus (disqus_vZYaoaKMFY) follow that Lunatic conspiracy theorist.

            Here is brief list I have compiled of his outrageous, hypocritical and retarded claims.

            He started his blog with first post being on Namboodari Brahmins of Kerala and how they had been racist for millennia even without knowing the fact that those brahmins started abusing their power just 1-2 centuries back and not millennia like he claims because the then king of that region instilled in them power which they didnt have before.

            According to him, prophet muhammad was actually a Keralite who spoke Malayam(therefore illiterate in arabic) and used to visit Kerala often.

            claims Jesus used to come to Kerala to learn from keralites yogis.

            defends and has a bleeding heart for arabs and their progeny moplah.

            claims that Jews are Namboodari Brahmins kicked from Kerala.

            denies Holocaust.

            claims that 9/11 was an American inside job done by Jews and Bush to defame islam.

            claims Jews are responsible for Armenian genocide.

            claims that ISIS are actually Jews who want to defame islam.

            I also suppose he associates Shiva with muslim god allah as he makes retarded claim that Hanuman is not an Avatar of Shiva as Shiva is incapable of taking Avatar which falls in line with western propaganda claims about Shiva.

            He is a very vocal supporter of Palestine and abuses Jews while blaming Israel.

            He also makes various outrageous claims that anyone with light colored eyed ethnic Indian in Indian subcontinent are infact Jews. But at the same time claims that the yazidis with blonde hair and light color eyes are all Hindus.

            Chitpavan Brahmins of Maharashtra are all jews and therefore all the Hindu Customs of Maharashtra are jew conspiracy.

            According to him, animal sacrifice in Hinduism is jewish conspiracy but at the same time savors veal and beef killed in halal way.

            He claims woman menstruation cycle is based on phases of moon and apparently this claims was debunked long back by science yet he still insists that all women readers of his blog follow it.

            Khajurao Temple is Jewish Conspiracy as his islamic mindset finds it disgusting.

            Most if not all the customs/rituals, in states north of Kerala are all jewish conspiracies and proclaims that If anyone wants to follow “real” version of Hinduism then they should follow Hindu Gods in temple of Kerala along with the rituals and customs of those temples in Kerala and nothing else as others are all jewish conspiracies.

            attacks Vaishnavism and calls the various Vaishnavite Temples are jew conspiracy.

            attacks Radha calling her a jew conspiracy and Saint Tulsidas as jewish stooge.

            attacks Swami Vivekananda and proclaims he came in contact with Jew handlers in USA because he asked Hindus to eat beef while this chewtyakayil eats veal probably everyday.

            abuses Shri Ram and calls him backstabber.

            claims Kalaripayattu is the most ancient martial art as it is from his native state without acknowledging the fact that it is infact based from the much older Tamil Martial Arts.

            claims that Asoka is British-Jewish conspiracy.

            There are many such retarded claims but this is enough for you get the gist of what you are dealing with here.

            Edit. I just read all your replies and you figured him out from where he gets his bullshit from as soon as he attacked Chitpavan Brahmins.

            Ignore my post.

  • Rajalakshmi J

    After being ruled over by Muslim invaders followed by christian colonizers , India no longer belongs to Hindus proper. Even with so called Hindu BJP ruling it is the british constitution that is being followed by the Indian Establishment.

    We Hindus are the truly dispossessed & endangered minorities in our own country. We are coerced into wearing the secular mantle appeasing christians & muslims in our midst.

    Hence I fail to understand the meaning of the phrase “Hindus’ interests”.

  • Anfauglir

    I’ll just repeat my comments from elsewhere as they’re applicable here.

    Cryptochristians are as active among Jews as among Hindus: lots of christians (still) keep Jewish names and even pretend to be Jewish while attacking Jews or Hindus or other non-christians from behind a facade of Judaism.

    Many Hindus misidentify cryptochristians as Jews because of that. For instance,

    Wendy Doniger’s father is an evangelical christian and missionary. Just because Wendy’s surname sounds Jewish (though the O’Flaherty part of her surname isn’t) doesn’t mean she is Jewish. Her pointed lying against Hinduism to dismantle it indicates that she’s a cryptochristian using a cloak of non-christianism to shield her own religion from Hindu retaliation. Her father being an evangelical and their family connects to the CIA seals the matter.

    Other Indian nationalists have documented that Martha Nussbaum is of a christian family, married a Jewish man, divorced him but kept his surname in order to launch her christian attacks on Hindus from behind a Jewish name. (So that Jews will get blamed ones more for christian anti-Hinduism.)

    Israel Shamir is an orthodox christian converted from Judaism, who attacks Jews and Judaism in service of his christianity as virulently as Indian christians converted from Hinduism attack Hindus and Hinduism, also for the christian cause. Israel Shamir, note the cryptochristian still using a Jewish name, typically champions the holocaust by means of holocaust denial. He recently even denied the Rwanda genocide, since christianity was to blame for the genocide (but sadly for Shamir, christian nuns and priests are on record confessing not only their participation in the genocide but having incited it too).

    There may well be some Jews in America attacking Hindus and Hinduism, since Judaism is a monotheism and American christian theological organisations find it useful to use others as cover to attack Hindus with (to protect christianity from incrimination). But because Judaism is not so missionary as the 2 missionary monotheisms, or ceased to be missionary longer ago, there are also Jews who have taken a live-and-let-live attitude to polytheism and Hindus in particular, and have worked hard to write against AIT and to expose the silent christian and islamic genocide of Hindus in India.

    What I am saying is that Judaism and Jews are not conspiring against Hindus and Hinduism, even if there may be individual Jews who have been attacking Hindus (and all those I have come across seem to have been fielded by christianity). And I know and have read many Jewish persons who are not converts to Hinduism, yet who support Hindus’ right to exist against the belligerent missionary ideologies.
    In contrast, christianity and islam do conspire, even together, against Hindus and Hinduism, and against many others too.

    Schaffer and Lichtenstein are archaeologists who wrote a paper, “Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, Interpretation and History”, supporting the antiquity of the continuity and thus nativeness of India’s population, directly challenging the AIT and AMT.

    The names Lichtenstein and Schaffer are both German as well as European-Jewish surnames.

    Axelrod and Fuerch wrote the journal article “Flight of the Deities: Hindu Resistance in Portuguese Goa” which was surprisingly positive about Hindus and Hinduism and Hindus’ devoted loyalty to the Devas. It is the neutrality of the researchers’ treatment that works positively, as this stands out compared to the many western journal articles that are unmistakably anti-Hindu instead of neutral and which last are written by authors clearly motivated by anti-Hindu agendas.

    Axelrod is not just a surname of an aristocratic British family, but is also a common surname among Jews in America. I’m not entirely certain about Fuerch: I know Germans (non-Jews) do have this surname, but I can’t rule out that it might be a surname used by European Jewry too.

    The above are some of the possibly or rather probably ethnically Jewish persons (who might be secular Jews) that I can think of at the moment who are 1. relatively famous, 2. have written factually about Hindus, Hinduism and history pertaining to us and have thus been a positive force to us by means of their neutrality/honesty. 3. This is especially noteworthy because such people do not appear to be converts to Hinduism or to have an Indian spouse. As a result, they do not seem to be motivated by self-interest, the way countless non-Jewish western people who are positive about Hinduism are. The latter tend to almost always have an Indian spouse or else be converts (or neo-pagans who are into doing Hinduism and many other religions part-time). The last are further not guaranteed to defend Hindus even when they defend Hinduism, as they’re often enough only interested in Hinduism for themselves.

    In contrast, all the prominent people I’ve ever come across who have been either 1. neutral, meaning plainly truthful, about Hindus and Hinduism or else 2. actively defend Hindus and Hinduism
    and who have done either of these without any unnatural self-interest as far as I could detect, fall into 3 groups:
    1. native Hindus themselves, whose interest in defending Hinduism and fellow Hindus is natural and justified because it is their own, native religion, 2. other native heathens from all over the world including even Europe, and 3. Jewish persons, often secular/atheist Jews.

    The first 2 of these groups makes immediate sense. The 3rd I always found interesting and was a pleasant surprise initially. It also turned out to be a recurring pattern.

    But perhaps Jews’ neutrality and honesty towards Hindus fits into a larger picture: Jewish persons have defended Africans in writings. E.g. the atheist Jewish-origin Chapman Cohen revealed in “Christianity, Slavery and Labour” that Congolese cutting off their own people’s hands was a ‘practice’ entirely introduced by christian colonialism and was therefore not a native “tradition” of the Congo, contrary to missionary propaganda.

    And Jewish persons have written extensively about other genocides, and not just their own holocaust. They have supported victims of other genocides (Rwandan, Gypsy and Serbian orthodox, for instance). I mention this since christian and communist writers feign, almost in concert, that Jews supposedly pretend they’re the only victims of genocide, and that the holocaust was the only genocide perpetrated by nazis, and that Jews have no sympathy for other populations’ victimhood. Yet, from my own extensive reading on materials available on the nazi era, I’ve repeatedly found many Jewish writers have long been at the forefront of not only expressing sincere sympathy with other victim populations of genocides (as only victims themselves can), but also of having spent many decades in trying to raise awareness of other populations’ victimhood from nazi genocides even in Jewish sites on the holocaust.

  • Anfauglir

    Said the “Not to mention the safety and security of the expats themselves, all ~8 million of them”

    What safety and security?

    Work is torture for Sri Lanka maids, BBC November 2003

    What makes Kusuma cry is not the memory of repeated assaults but the look on her children’s faces when they saw her in hospital. “After three months, I asked Madam for my salary and she started to beat me with iron bars and wooden sticks,” the maid explains of her time in Saudi Arabia. “Sometimes she would take a hot iron and burn me or heat up a knife and put it on my body.” Kusuma is still trying to understand why her employer treated her this way when she had not done anything wrong.

    Lebanon does operate a blacklist system for bad employers, but that did not help 41-year-old Soma, who recalls repeated rapes by the 18-year-old son of her female employer. “When I went to his bedroom he closed the door and removed my clothes and his. When I tried to resist he threatened to kill me,” she says. Soma says she begged him to spare her on the grounds that she had a son his age. “Another day, his four friends came to the house. When I took tea to the room they closed the door and kept me on their laps and started to touch my body and abuse me,” she says in tears. All the men then raped her. There was little comfort from Soma’s employer, who seemed to think she had employed a prostitute for her son rather than a cleaner for her house. “I complained to his mother and she just said, ‘I will give you pills to make sure you don’t get pregnant’ and she beat me.”

    Soma eventually escaped from the flat and walked for four hours until she met by chance a Sri Lankan couple who took her home, fed her and took her to the embassy.

    Although the rapes were reported to the embassy and police, Soma was just put on a plane home. Nothing happened to her rapists.

    Sri Lankan maid suffers 17 years’ slavery in Saudi house, IANS via Yahoo 2011

    Riyadh, Feb 19 (IANS) A Sri Lankan maid, who was made to serve virtually as a slave by her Saudi sponsor for 17 years, has been rescued by officials of the Sri Lankan embassy in Saudi Arabia. Kusuma Nandini, 56, who had arrived in Riyadh in 1994, was kept as a slave at her sponsor’s home. She was not paid salary even once during the years of her enforced imprisonment at her employer’s house and was forbidden from communicating with her relatives in Sri Lanka, Arab News quoted Sunil Wijesinghe, labour welfare officer at the Sri Lankan embassy, as saying.
    A traumatised Nandini could not speak her native tongue when she was rescued and “behaved like a robot”. She had even forgotten her family members, said Wijesinghe.

    See also lankadailynews.com/2011/02/sri-lankan-maid-kept-slave-saudi-arabia/

    Archive of Nepal bars young women from working in Gulf: report, AFP via HimalayanTimes, August 2012

    KATHMANDU: Nepal has banned women under 30 from travelling to Gulf countries to work following reports of widespread sexual abuse and exploitation, local media said on Thursday.

    Maiti Nepal, which works to prevent the trafficking of Nepalese women abroad, welcomed the announcement, saying many underage girls travelled to the Gulf for work and abuse was common.

    “We have met several housemaids who were not only raped by their masters but also forced to have sex with the masters’ relatives. They are confined to the house and live in a situation akin to slavery,” director Bishwa Khadka said.

    There was an outcry in Sri Lanka in September 2010 when a maid returned from Saudi Arabia alleging that her employers had forced 24 nails and needles into her body. [1]

    Fifteen Nepalese women committed suicide in Lebanon in 2010 while two to three domestic helpers a week seek refuge in Nepalese embassies in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait following abuse from their employers, according to the Times.

    [1] See Nails removed from ‘tortured’ Sri Lankan maid BBC 2010:

    Doctors have removed 13 nails and five needles from a Sri Lankan housemaid who said her employer in Saudi Arabia hammered them into her body. LP Ariyawathie, 49, told staff at Kamburupitiya Hospital her employer inflicted the injuries as a punishment. X-rays showed that there were 24 nails and needles in her body. … Last week, she flew back to Sri Lanka and was admitted to hospital in the south of the island, where she told doctors she had undergone abuse for more than a month.

    Another BBC report from the time mentions the horrific statistic that “more than 500,000 workers from Sri Lanka already in the country, most of whom are women.”
    Unsurprisingly: Sri Lankan at Risk of Being Beheaded for Praying to Buddha, 2008:

    A Sri Lankan youth employed as a domestic aid has been arrested in Saudi Arabia for praying to a statue of Lord Buddha, which is considered an offence according to Islamic Sharia law.

    It seems muslim nations play at who among them is the most barbaric, because muslims of the Middle-East even attack muslim Indonesian workmaids when there’s no non-monotheist victim around:
    BBC, 2008

    “Ms Miyati, 25, contracted gangrene after allegedly being tied up for a month and left without food in 2005. She had to have several fingers and toes amputated. … All charges against Ms Miyati’s male employer were dropped early in the investigation, Human Rights Watch says. On Monday a Riyadh judge found the female employer not guilty, despite her earlier admission and “compelling physical evidence”, the group says. A prior Saudi judgement, subsequently overturned, had seen Ms Miyati convicted of falsely accusing her employers and sentenced to 79 lashes. Human Rights Watch said the latest ruling “sends a dangerous message to Saudi employers that they can beat domestic workers with impunity and that victims have little hope of justice”.”

    … she thought there was no point in thinking of her home in Sri Lanka as she was permanently imprisoned in the house.
    “I did not see sunlight during the past 17 years since no one took me out,” she said.

    Qatar’s World Cup 2022: to claim 4000 (mostly Indic) lives. Also to be filed under Islamic genocide of enslaved Indians. It’s what happened in the islamic dark ages of our country too.
    World Cup Slaves: It Gets Worse, The Daily Beast, 2015, by Robert Silverman (Jewish surname?) who sticks up for the Nepali Hindus brutally abused in Qatar (whereas Navnit Kundu was whitewashing such things for the sake of protecting Hindus’ enemies)

    Nepalese migrant workers on Qatar’s 2022 World Cup stadiums were met with their worst indignity yet: they were disallowed from going home to the funerals of relatives who were killed in last month’s earthquake.

    “Difficult conditions” doesn’t begin to describe what’s occurring to workers here. A 2014 report from the International Trade Union Confederation projected that “at least 4,000 people in total will die before the start of the World Cup in 2022.”
    That number potentially represents a serious underestimation, given that it was derived from “statistics collected by two embassies only—Nepal and India—which account for around 5% of the total migrant workforce.”

    The report also makes it clear that “Whether the cause of death is labeled a work accident, heart attack (brought on by the life threatening effects of heat stress) or diseases from squalid living conditions, the root cause is the same—working conditions.”

    And just in case Navnit Kundu next alleges that the Daily Beast’s expose by Silverman is a “Jewish” conspiracy against the Middle-East, the FIFA slavery-cum-genocide is still happening as per a great many news reports:
    Migrant workers suffer ‘appalling treatment’ in Qatar World Cup stadiums, The Guardian UK, 2016.

    And it’s not just the World Cup:

    Johann Hari: A morally bankrupt dictatorship built by slave labour Independent UK, 2009

    Dubai is finally financially bankrupt – but it has been morally bankrupt all along. The tour books and the bragging Emiratis will tell you the city was built by Sheikh Mohammed, the country’s hereditary ruler. It is untrue. The people who really built the city can be seen in long chain-gangs by the side of the road, or toiling all day at the top of the tallest buildings in the world, in heat that Westerners are told not to stay in for more than 10 minutes. They were conned into coming, and trapped into staying. In their home country “Bangladesh or the Philippines or India” these workers are told they can earn a fortune in Dubai if they pay a large upfront fee. When they arrive, their passports are taken from them, and they are told their wages are a tenth of the rate they were promised. They end up working in extremely dangerous conditions for years, just to pay back their initial debt. They are ringed-off in filthy tent-cities outside Dubai, where they sleep in weeping heat, next to open sewage. They have no way to go home. And if they try to strike for better conditions, they are beaten by the police. I met so many men in this position I stopped counting, just as the embassies were told to stop counting how many workers die in these conditions every year after they figured it topped more than 1,000 among the Indians alone.

    Human Rights Watch calls this system “slavery.” Yet the Westerners who have flocked to Dubai brag that they “love” the city, because they don’t have to pay any taxes, and they have domestic slaves to do all the hard work. They train themselves not to see the pain.

    Yet soon Navnit Kundu will tell us that this is part of the “safety, security” and all-round great advantage of the middle-east to non-monotheist Indics, and that it’s the price such Indics have signed up to pay for “India getting upwards of 50 Billion USD in remittances from our expats living there.” I don’t know why India doesn’t pass. It certainly won’t if it’s up to Navnit Kundu.

    The sooner that the Indian, Nepalese and Sri Lankan governments ban non-monotheist Indians from working in the muslim middle-east, the better. As seen above, in 2012, Nepal was forced to enact such a ban for women under 30 years of age, since they were relentlessly raped by their middle eastern muslim employers. However, as also apparent from news reports above, far older women were gangraped by said “benign” middle-eastern muslim; and our men aren’t safe from the genocidal mayhem there either. So the ban or rather boycott should be uniform.

    Is the author, Navnit Kundu, ignorant or merely lying with a brazen face, perhaps — probably, more like it — paid by the Arab muslims to do PR? That is all I can think of as would explain his desperate attempts to sell the islamic middle-east as being benign to Hindus while trying to project Israel/Jews as our enemy. I think the facts speak for themselves. Besides questioning Navnit Kundu’s motivations firing his obvious lies.
    Tomorrow, I anticipate Navnit Kundu will come with a write-up about why Pakistan is kinder to Hindu India than Israel (or even Nepal or even a nationalist Indian government).

    Since Navnit Kundu doesn’t mind, perhaps he wants to take his (especially female) relatives and strand them in that benevolent middle-east of his, to show just how much he believes in his own lies. He should set the example and be willing to sacrifice those dear to him for his own anti-Israeli/pro-Middle-Eastern visions, after all, if he wants others to follow his path to collective suicide. But if he’s suddenly not willing to do as he advises others to do, he may shut up with his lies. About both Israel and the islamic Middle-East/Iran. The rest of us are not as ignorant as his islamic paymasters from the middle-east imagine we are.

  • gl7rwh35

    bahut tark diye aapne.