Author: Yuga Parivartan yuga_parivartan

The ‘Peaceful Indian Muslim’ Conundrum- Part II

Part II of II — ← Read Part I

The myth of “Peaceful Indian Muslim” is carefully nurtured and sustained by the fake secularism practised in India. Whenever there is an attempt by anyone to uncover this veil, there are liberals who come up with fancy theories like Islamophobia to prevent the enlightenment of Muslim masses. What can be more sad than even a well-read, intelligent person feeling that telling this truth amounts to “making Muslims feel persecuted.” Well, if a person holds wrong ideas he needs to be confronted one day or the other. Would you also say that arresting rapists is incorrect because it amounts to singling them out? As a civilized society there is a red line that no one is allowed to cross. Gloating over the massacre of kafirs is not a civilized idea to espouse, and people need to confront those who do it instead of finding excuses.

Unless Indian history textbooks tell their students about the atrocities perpetuated by Muslims on Dharmics, they will continue to look at that atrocious period as their “glorious past” — and the more they romanticize it, the more difficult they will find it to come to terms with contemporary realities. It is THIS dissonance which leads to terrorism. The killing of Hindus by Muslim invaders was not a glorious act and those who romanticize it are not civilized people.

So how to fight against this ideological terrorism? The answer is education — and not just school education but political education of the masses. The idea should be propagated on all information channels until it becomes common parlance. The reason Muslims take to terrorism is because they feel they lived a glorious past where they could kill Hindus, in contrast to the lacklustre life they are living now where they have to abide by the rules of the land instead of being rulers. Unless there is a concerted effort to challenge and defeat this idea, India will always face an existential threat from Muslims. Admission of Muslim atrocities should become the mainstream quintessential Indian thought. There are so many museums in Germany and Japan depicting the atrocities committed by their ancestors on innocent people. Every year Hollywood comes out with half a dozen movies showing how bad the Holocaust was. This is the template that India should follow. There should be museums depicting the atrocities instead of making Bollywood movies and books that eulogize Akbar and Tipu Sultan.

What ordinary Indians want is not something extraordinary. They simply want closure similar to the one that Germans and Japanese got when they admitted their mistakes. You can sing a thousand songs in the praise of moderate Indian Muslims, but the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

The very fact that Hindus aren’t allowed to claim Ram Mandir is a testimony to the fact that Indian Muslims don’t adhere to a more evolved and tolerant form of Islam. Ram Janmabhoomi is to Hindus what Mecca is to Muslims — there can be no negotiation on this. Hindus have already forgotten the demolition of 40,000 temples by Muslims, but if they cannot budge on even one temple then there is no chance for reconciliation. If a case is being made that Indian Muslims are more reconciliatory in nature, where is the evidence?

Celebrating that Indian Muslims are better than the rest of their ilk is a relative and subjective benchmark. From time to time we must ask ourselves whether this “relatively good” is “good enough.” A woman journalist in Mumbai was hounded into exile by the same peaceful Muslims for reposting the Charlie Hebdo cartoon while reporting about it. Now, this act might be committed by a group of 5,000 people but the thought process is not an outlier. Same goes for the thousands — 15,000 people — who thronged the funeral of their “martyr” Yakoob Memon.

The deeper you go into the rabbit hole of Muslim extremist nexus, sooner or later you will realize that it is mainstream Islam — not a fringe, not a sect, not a twisted individual — but mainstream Islam which is responsible for all problems. One can draw artificial lines to separate them into moderates and extremists virtually speaking, but the crux of the matter is that until you are willing to admit that an ideology which at its core preaches that “everyone who disagrees with us is an enemy,” this problem will never be solved.

Like the Afghan intel chief Amarullah Saleh once said: “You will keep killing the guys in the outer circle for years and patting yourself on the back but the problem won’t be solved until you have the resolve to confront the guys in the inner circle who are running the show.” He was taunting the US for killing low-level commanders in Afghanistan but not confronting Saudi Arabia. Fake seculars are doing the same by drawing a dichotomy between gun-wielding terrorists and non-gun-wielding “peaceful chaps.” Terrorism is not about weapons — it is about ideology.

Being ruthless and killing people is not the recommended path. It is actually the “head in the sand” syndrome of fake liberals which will lead India into a civil war by not acknowledging the problem. A better way is to give closure on the atrocity issue. Include lessons of anti-Hindu atrocities in history books so that both Hindus and Muslims become aware of it and have a sense of national context instead of building their own personal victimhood narratives. Muslims claim that the Babri incident was wrong, but don’t want to concede that their co-religionist invaders captured and destroyed Hindu temples. This intellectual subversion is unacceptable. There is a need to have a frank discussion where people can put everything on the table so that everyone knows each other’s history and empathizes with the other before pointing fingers.

The more the rights of Hindus the state curtails, the more Hindu anger it will fuel — the eruption of which will lead to incidents of violence, which will lead to further radicalization and polarization on both sides. The constitution mentions secularism; it is about time that Hindus taste it too. Hindus have only been smelling it from afar while Muslims relished the entire cake of secularism.

To put it in short: India needs to take concrete steps to trash the Hindu narrative and Muslim narrative and adopt a common and reconciliatory national narrative which is acceptable to both parties — only then can people find closure and achieve peace. Otherwise these issues will keep flaring up.

There is a beautiful thesis about the fundamental difference between India and Pakistan which can be summarized in one line: “the story of Pakistan is the story of the state of Pakistan, and the story of India is the story of the people of India.” It holds true for the modus operandi of all Muslim states. The moment its citizens ask for some human rights or even basic things like water and schools, the state says “the nation is under threat and you are asking for things? You are not a true Muslim!” That is how Muslim states keep the dreams of their population suppressed. The very definition of a “true Muslim” has been fundamentally crafted in such a way that the individual is supposed to selflessly sacrifice for the survival of the Ummah dream — and because of this feudal definition, the individual will never have any rights for himself. This feudal system will eventually collapse, no doubt about it. But will the Indian state ever tell this real story to Indian Muslims and aid them in bursting this bubble?

May 24, 2016
Minimum wage bill: unemployment tax on poor

It is unfortunate that in India important news on economics are usually hidden deep inside the regular newspapers and crucial laws are passed without much debate. One of the recent such news was the decision of Modi government to increase the minimum wage for contract workers to Rs. 10,000.

The article criticizes the government for not clearly explaining how the Rs 10,000 figure was determined and for invoking the Supreme Court as justification for economic policy.

The case against minimum wages goes as follows

1) Minimum wages reduce employment among unskilled workers

2) Therefore minimum wages hurt people whom it is actually supposed to help

In a surplus labour economy like India, when government imposes laws like minimum wage it makes firms less competitive by increasing their wage bill.

The article compares apparel wages in India and Bangladesh, arguing that higher labour costs have contributed to Bangladesh’s stronger export performance.

It argues that minimum wage laws help current job holders but reduce entry-level employment and discourage the formation of new firms.

The article cites research by Maloney and Mendez on Colombia, claiming that employment declined most sharply among workers earning below the minimum wage, while higher-paid workers were also affected when firms closed.

Given this evidence, the article argues that India should avoid imposing a uniform wage floor that may push workers into unemployment or into the informal sector.

Also read: Make in India: How to make it work

References:
Measuring the Impact of Minimum Wages

Image credits:
http://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/delhi-govt-introduces-bill-to-revise-minimum-wage-of-workers/

May 19, 2016
The Crab Mentality of Hindu Right Wing

Do you know that burqa is empowering and is the best thing ever designed to express solidarity against patriarchy? Wearing a burqa is a fundamental right of any women and those who wear it should be respected for their courage to stand against the evil patriarchal society.

Well the above paragraph, with all its inconsistencies, can be lifted up from any current publications by leftists. But this article is neither about Islamic feminism nor about west. It is rather about crab mentality of Hindu Right wing, where the flag bearers lose no chance to bring each other down whenever possible.

BJP is hardly a Hindu right wing party but for all its drawbacks, it is still the only viable option on the right. Now think of the drama that got unleashed before Modi was anointed as BJP’s PM candidate. The sulking Advani was courted by the Lutyens media to fire salvo after salvo against Modi. But media did what it was supposed to do i.e. help the Congress ecosystem, and made mountains out of molehill. The sulking patriarch on the Hindu right rather than keeping his feelings private and blessing his protégée in public, decided to play into the hands of the same media.

The dissent was crushed to a great extent by Modi but it keeps rising time and again, sometimes led by old horses who are hurt by the fact that they were ignored when crumbs of power were thrown around. The biggest failure of this season has been Arun Shourie who resorted to personal attacks against Modi and called him narcissistic and dictator in a live show hosted by Karan Thapar.

But Shourie is not the only politician/intellectual who can be accused of such mud-slinging. This mud-slinging fest is actually even more common among the intellectuals. The feud between Malhotra and Ganesh had hardly died when Talageri fired his ammo against Manasataramgini, a famous blogger on RW, questioning his views on AIT but character assassinating him in the process.

While western scholars build consensus by slightly modifying each others’ views in peer reviewed journals, the Hindus come out as clowns who don’t lose any chance to bring each other down over minor disagreements.

Since the left still controls the public narrative, the need of the hour is to keep the dissent among Hindus internal rather than publicly vocalizing it. The intellectual debate in the public sphere should be encouraged, but any personal attacks should be avoided at all costs.

There is another very important point which has slowed the growth of RW ecosystem in India. The number of retweets and endorsements by left wing portals and their contributors of their competitors’s articles far outnumber those by the RW. While Scroll and Caravan frequently endorse each other, the RW portals like Swarajya and Indiafacts hardly help each other grow.

Moral of the story- RW needs to get its act together and work cooperatively with more emphasis on the common agenda rather than for petty personal fame, ego or money. Once RW gains control of the narrative and builds a healthy ecosystem, they will get enough opportunities for back biting and mudslinging. But till then they need to suck up to each other to survive else no one can save them from their premature death at the hands of left.

Image credits: http://newsfirst.lk/

May 15, 2016
Why Right to Education Act is evil

Right to education act is being hailed as the landmark legislation in providing free and compulsory education to all Indian kids and is touted to be the greatest achievement of the UPA. The propaganda surrounding it is so severe that many Indians, who are otherwise sane, normal and anti-congress seem to think it is the best thing ever. They seem to have internalised the propaganda of the media and politicians that Free and Education are such good words that if they come together they will make the world even better. In the end, everyone seems to care more about the buzzword “free education” and the snake oil sales pitch, “Right to Education”, than its fine points or harmful effects on the ground. Even a brief analysis of the fine texts of the Right to Education act will tell a common reader, not fully drenched in propagandist nonsense, on how evil this law is. The government which has failed to provide decent education infrastructure in 60 years is now hell bent upon destroying whatever little is left in private education sector.

Quantity argument

Most of the support for RTE comes from the middle and poor class Hindus, who think that RTE is great because it forces the large private schools to collect less money than they otherwise would. But those Hindus don’t seem to understand that the RTE does more harm to the low tier, low budget private schools than it does to cap what the large schools will collect as fees. For example, many people don’t know that one of the RTE stipulations in many states, is to pay the teachers a minimum salary as recommended by 6th pay commission of India. For example, the teachers should be played a salary of 23,000 Rs/month in Delhi just like their government school counterparts. But most of the private schools in towns, villages and in some cases cities, are low budget/low tier ones where the fees they collect is minimal, to the tune of 500 to 1000 Rs/month. Do you expect them to pay their teachers the salary in accordance with 6th pay commission or shut shop? Also, there is stipulation that the student teacher ratio should be 30:1. Given fees of 500 Rs/month per students and 30 students per teacher, it gives a monthly collection of 15,000 Rs. So how exactly will the small school run after paying 30,000 Rs/month as salary to its teachers while getting a fee of 500 Rs/month per student? So either the small schools should increase the fees to make a profit or close down.

But raising the school fees above a point in villages and towns would make the parents leave the schools in favour of undermanned and under quality government schools, which successive governments have completely ignored till now. This is exactly how the small schools are getting closed down in India, with some estimates suggesting closure of 10,000+ schools till now. If you take an average student population of 500 in each of these closed schools, it is a total of 50,00,000 (50 lakhs) students who are forced to study in a school which is below par what they were studying before RTE came into force. Thanks to Jholachaps sitting in AC offices, these poor students are now studying in rag-tag government schools instead of low tier/low budget but better private school. Think logically why would the parents pay 500 Rs/month for a private school if they did not think that those schools were better quality than the neighbouring government schools, which were giving free education anyway. Also, those 10,000+ closed schools would have turned into 100,000+ schools if not for the fact that RTE is not implemented properly in many states and many schools bribe RTE enforcing officers as that is the only way for them to stay afloat. This is one of the examples where corruption is better than following law at giving results when the law is ridiculously stupid. Is it any wonder that in many areas poor Hindu students are forced to be educated in madarassas, since the advent of RTE has forced closure of Hindu schools but has exempted all minority ones? Also, the same presstitutes who ran horror stories on big school fees and pimped for RTE are now completely silent on the destruction of the Hindu schools under RTE. In which country except India the closure of 10,000+ schools will not be news worthy and remain confined to internet and social media?

As per RTE, the government has made it mandatory for the private schools to admit 25% of its students free of cost. Since schools are a service provider just like any service provider, they need profits to operate as they are not in the business for charity. Since 25% of the students will get education for free and schools are not there for social service, so someone needs to foot the extra bill. Who else but the remaining 75% students and their parents had to bear this cost to subsidize the 25% freeloaders. To prevent hue and cry against it, the government being a good Samaritan that it is, decided to help the 75% as well by stating that government would take care of the cost of those 25%. But schools, just like any service provider like IT industry or retail shops, would have taken advantage of the free government subsidy for the poor students and increased the fees for the education, in the hope that Government would pay for it any way. Given this incentive problem the government decided to cap the maximum fee that schools can charge from their students. So you can see how government created layers of problems and then laws to solve the initial problem.

The above maze of laws has created a big misconception that since the government subsidises the private schools for the 25% costs so there should be no problem. But this government subsidy for the 25% is based on the average school fees for the average student and hence the government subsides for the poor/low tier/low budget schools would still be only 500 Rs/month which is inadequate to help them. The government subsidies will only help the top tier schools which are already collecting 30,000 Rs/year or more as fees. But even they are not so lucky as the government subsidy for the poor students do not reach these schools in time, sometimes running arrears to the tune of 3-4 years. So in the short term, those schools have to face big financial crisis. One can only imagine how great it would be to run a business with 75% of the revenues which you are supposed to get at some point but don’t know when.

Quality argument

This fairy tale sounds perfect until one looks at the effect such law will have on school quality. The middle class wanted the schools to be cheap and found this proposal very good as they all see the schools as rip-offs, even though they voluntarily send their kids to these schools after fully knowing their fees. But since the government has now put a maximum cap on the school fees, the schools cannot increase the quality of the education nor the amount of extracurricular activities since they can’t afford any new activities given this fee cap. This has lead to stagnation of the quality of education in the schools. So not only schools have closed down but RTE has also had an effect on school quality.

So the middle class parents, who are now better off due to income increase or are simply ready to sacrifice to ensure better quality of education for their kids, need to find a new school and this new school will invariably be a Christian school since Christian schools are exempt from the RTE. These Christian schools can charge whatever fees they want and pay whatever salary they want to their employees. They can invariably operate under a profit and hence afford new extracurricular activities in their schools like horse raiding, tennis, swimming etc and leave behind all other schools operated by Hindus.

Since the middle class Hindus are too cool, too selfish and too intelligent to live with their parents, the children of such middle class Hindus would be raised in Christian schools, without any one teaching them their actual tradition and history. These same children would then grow up to be Hindus in name only(HINO) and die hard liberals who would think Hinduism is bad and illiberal while corpse worship and ritualised cannibalism of Christianity is a great tradition. They would end up thinking how Secularism is synonymous with anti-Hinduism and progress, just like how most urban Hindus educated in convent schools think today. Is it any wonder that UPA under the evangelical waitress Sonia Gandhi decided to come up with this brilliant education bill and got ample support by the anti-Hindu and anti-India Marxist cabal as well as the Hindus in name only brigade of BJP? Now you know why the American with brown skin and Hindu name i.e. BJP chief minister Devendra Fat Novice (oops Fadnavis) is more than happy to educate his daughter in Christian convent school.

Would RTE be less evil if it includes minority schools?

Even if this act is implemented in such a way that the minority institutions are to be included under it, it still won’t help the lower middle class Hindu parents, who want their sons and daughters to study in a school where there is a better quality of education than the one provided in the government schools but cannot afford to send their children to fancy convent schools or big shot private residency type schools since the RTE act is especially vicious against the low-tier private schools. So instead of news like how Hindu students are forced to go to madarassas, there will be news on how Hindus students are now stacked in low quality government schools. Of course, the media would ignore that those Hindu parents and children had no option of low-tier, low budget private schools, which were closed off due to RTE act, just like how media is ignoring the closure of more that 10,000+ schools since the implementation of this act. Hence, the suggestion by the pathologically altruistic and brainwashed Hindu middle class that RTE is flawed only because of its non-applicability to religious minority institutions and can be fixed by enforcing it on minorities is equally stupid.

In short, RTE is a travesty of justice to the educational rights of poor Hindu children, designed specifically to kill off Hindu educational institutions and to re-establish the hold on the private school education which the Church had before liberalization of Indian economy in 1991. The subsequent level playing field for Hindu educational institutes was destroyed in one strike by RTE by masquerading under a wonderful buzzword called “Free Education”. The useful idiots i.e. Hindu middle class still can’t see how they have willingly placed this dynamite under their own civilization. So long as destructive policies like RTE are supported based on personal feelings of goodness, disregarding the destruction they can cause to the future of the very same people they are supposed to help, there is no hope for a better India. Closure of 10,000+ schools has already denied a better future to 50 lakh students, how many more lives are you willing to destroy for feeling good about yourself and stoking your ego with fake charity whose cost will be ultimately borne by the dark future of poor students?

May 14, 2016
How India can get a pro-Hindu party
This is the fourth and final article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.

The previous article clearly articulated that BJP is not a pro-Hindu party or a proper nationalist party, so now the question arises: how can Hindus get a proper Hindu party? One method which we earlier suggested was to vote out BJP in local elections like municipalities, corporations and panchayats as a punishment for deviating from its pro-Hindu status and pro-nationalist stance, while voting it in to give it one more chance to perform at the national and state levels. Instead, pro-Hindu independent candidates can be voted in within their respective constituencies. This is one way to generate feedback to BJP and dissuade it from deviating from a pro-Hindu agenda.

The next, more important step is to infiltrate parties with pro-Hindu leaders at various levels by preferentially voting for them where possible.

Thirdly, if BJP does not serve as a proper pro-Hindu, pro-nationalist party, and if Hindus make it clear that any new party which is pro-Hindu has huge prospects in India, a new political party will emerge from the vacuum, much like BJP emerged from the vacuum in the 1980s, from a party of two MPs to a party with a single-party majority today. Such a hardline Hindu stance can be conveyed by voting in staunch Hindus like Yogi Adityanath, Kalyan Singh, Sakshi Maharaj and Uma Bharati, giving them massive electoral victories by consolidating behind them.

Finally, the worst thing Hindus can do is keep voting for BJP without any change in their voting pattern or any tactical thought behind it, even though that is precisely what BJP fanboys want them to do. BJP fanboys claim that since BJP is the least-worst option, it should not be criticized or punished by Hindus when it engages in jumlas for votes without doing anything for Hindus. What is the point of having BJP in power if it won’t do anything good for Hindus anyway? Careful analysis of BJP fanboy rhetoric will show how pathetic their position is. They seem inclined to believe that constant whining and bellyaching by fanboys and Hindus on social media like Facebook and Twitter will solve the problem of BJP not doing anything for Hindus. This is absurd considering that BJP is a political party like any other and will not care about what its fanboys think so long as it can get their votes. It has even made clear on multiple occasions that BJP’s top leadership thinks its fanboys are a nuisance for the BJP and its inclusive agenda.

Also, BJP and its fanboys are probably the only people in the whole world, besides communists, who ask what their supporters did for them, as if supporters owe them anything. Natural logic goes the other way, as political parties exist to cater to the needs of their voters. Hence any logical and neutral person can clearly see that BJP fanboy logic — whining and bellyaching on social media but voting for BJP anyway — will not yield any results, as BJP is more than happy to keep the pot boiling at just the right temperature to stay in power without actually fixing any problems.

Ironically enough, sometimes the same BJP fanboys go to extreme lengths to defend BJP’s position by claiming that it is a truly secular party and hence should not do anything for Hindus, even though they jump everywhere to silence people who ask for a new right-wing Hindu party to emerge. This only begs the question: why do they even bother to speak against the call for a true Hindu party or an alternative to BJP which they claim is a truly secular and not pro-Hindu party? The cognitive dissonance of these fanboys can be judged from their circular logic:
1. BJP is not perfect.
2. But there is no alternative to BJP.
3. Therefore assume that BJP is perfect.
4. Since BJP is now assumed to be perfect, we cannot criticize it.
5. But since BJP cannot be criticized, there will never be an alternative.
6. Given there will be no alternative, BJP is the only option, which takes us back to point 2.
Even hardcore Hindus think that a Hindu voting bloc will fall like manna from heaven or BJP will suddenly start implementing the Hindu agenda. But the fact is that until Hindus learn to punish anyone who tramples on their traditions, no party will ever turn pro-Hindu. The day they start punishing anti-Hindu agendas, every party will turn pro-Hindu. But to achieve that they need to put Hindu priorities above party or organization. How will it work?
1. Voters go vocal on pro-Hindu issues.
2. Congress and all others see it and turn a bit right on Hindu issues.
3. Given this opportunity, a new vocal far-Hindu-right party will emerge.
4. Looking at all this change, BJP will turn even more right.
5. End result: the entire political spectrum in India will shift pro-Hindu.
India will then become something like the West, which is secular but still proudly proclaims its Judeo-Christian roots. But if you keep giving breathing space to every BJP politician when they backtrack on their promises, then it won’t happen. Just look again at the cognitive-dissonance algorithm of fanboys above to understand why. Shivraj needs to pay for his Bhojshala rollback; the same goes for Fat-Novice on the Shani temple fiasco.

It would be better if Hindus learn something from Jews instead of fawning over them with irrational love, so that the Hindu agenda is obeyed no matter who is in power. Such a transition in politics would require actual work on the ground, which would send a message to BJP and other political parties that pro-Hindu policies and parties have huge potential to achieve power in India. The least destructive way to achieve it is by voting out BJP in local elections while explaining why they wouldn’t vote for sell-outs and brown-skinned Americans with Hindu pretensions. If Hindus start to build a consensus together now, either BJP will turn into a real pro-Hindu party or an alternative pro-Hindu party will arise within a decade, much like how pro-Modi consensus was formed within two years after 2012.

Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 of this series.
May 13, 2016
Why BJP is not a pro-Hindu party
This is the third article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 4.

Anyone who follows the realpolitik of the USA would observe that Republicans and their religious right are pro-Israel to the hilt. For instance, the Iraq war was orchestrated by Republican president Bush to help get rid of Israel’s local threat, Saddam’s Iraq. Does that mean that the left in the USA is anti-Jew or anti-Israel? In most communities or groups, when the right wing is pro-something, is the left wing usually anti the same thing? Of course not. The Democrats are equally fanatical supporters of Zionism and Israel, and Democrats under Obama and Hillary destabilized the entire Middle East from Libya to Syria for protecting the interests of Israel, often wasting the overall geopolitical influence, power and wealth of the USA. Jews usually have massive influence over the countries they live in, often disproportionate to their numbers, which forms an interesting case study in simple realpolitik. How Jews get their agenda implemented in the USA should be a case study for all aspiring Hindus.

Hindu nationalists often have an irrational love for Israel and huge admiration for Jews and their resilience. But have they learnt anything from them for implementing their own agenda? No. For instance, compare how Jews try to play both sides of the political spectrum by influencing both Democrats and Republicans in elections, so that no matter who comes to power, both serve the interests of Israel and Jews. Comparatively, Hindu nationalists still can’t seem to make up their minds whether their loyalty is to the ideology and Hindu cause or the supposedly Hindu party called BJP.

If Hindus have to win this ideological war against the Abrahamics and their numerous cousins — Marxists, feminists, liberals, seculars, etc. — they need to learn these games from the Jews they admire rather than chanting pro-Israel slogans without caring for Indian national interests. Thus, the first step is to determine whether their loyalty lies with any organization or with their ideology. Blind loyalty to a party or organization will only lead to the betterment of the party and not their ideology, and vice versa. So even if BJP portrays itself as a pro-Hindu party, it is much better to have an alternative as well in case BJP fails to deliver on its promises to Hindus or meet the expectations of its core Hindu voters. The objective should be to force all parties towards accepting a Hindu core agenda, such that they get punished for violating a certain threshold or Lakshman Rekha.

To achieve this objective one first needs to make up one’s mind and analyse whether BJP is actually a pro-Hindu party or whether it is just a bubble created by media to keep Hindus bogged down and never let them realize what a pro-Hindu party should look like. To do this study, one needs to look at recent events and assess whether BJP passes the smell test of being a pro-Hindu party:
1. Shani temple issue, where Dev Fadnavis, a brown American with Hindu pretensions, decided to desecrate Hindu traditions just to appease an anti-Hindu feminist, even though the majority of common Hindus in Maharashtra, and indeed the whole of India, are against the idea, except perhaps his equally deracinated brown-American brothers stuck in Hindu India.
1. Bhojshala temple, where the BJP government of Madhya Pradesh sold out Hindus and their temple to Mullahs.
1. Right to Education Act, which is a special case of BJP not backstabbing Hindus but being outright anti-Hindu, where BJP actively supported getting it passed and till now hasn’t taken any interest in fixing it. In fact, the brown American with an Indian passport, Devendra Fadnavis, is actively implementing the RTE Act with zealotry in Maharashtra, causing the closure of several thousand Hindu schools, while his daughter gets educated in a Christian convent which is outside the ambit of the RTE Act.
1. NIT students were backstabbed by BJP for staying in power in Kashmir. While apologists claim that BJP is doing good by staying in power, any neutral observer should ask what good such power is in the hands of BJP if their ground supporters are going to be screwed by Islamists and anti-nationals anyway.
1. Not showing any interest in fixing academia in India, which is the fountainhead of Hinduphobic discourse, sowing seeds for sectarianism, often spewing venom against Hindus and justifying Islamic savagery in medieval India while simultaneously downplaying facts like the destruction of thousands of temples as fiction of Hindutva imagination, even though the Islamic barbarians themselves wrote books praising and extolling their rulers for destroying these temples and killing millions of innocent Hindus.
To make matters worse, the esteemed HRD minister Smriti Irani is more concerned about veg and non-veg food being served in Indian colleges than fixing the rot in today’s academia — going after useless brainwashed idiots like Kanhaiya rather than the academic snakes and ringmasters who brainwash newer generations of students through anti-national propaganda in institutes like JNU. Smriti Irani even gets applause from BJP fanboys when she proudly proclaims how she hasn’t changed a single book, academician, course or syllabus since she became HRD minister, to bolster her neutral credentials. The fact is that fixing academia is something which doesn’t need Rajya Sabha backing or a majority, but just political will.
1. The decision to induct women into combat forces, with Home Minister Rajnath saying that they will give 33% reservation for women in CRPF and open frontline combat roles for women in the Army. Should we not learn from the Ambur Muslim riots in Tamil Nadu, where many policewomen were molested and harassed? And this is an incident which happened inside India where Hindus are the majority. You can easily imagine the horror of sending Hindu women into combat against the Pakistani army, which is ISIS except in name. It’s not that they will refrain from rape or torture or treat them like saints, given the way they behaved in Bangladesh. BJP is once again more interested in being brown Americans with Hindu names, just like their fanboys who support this initiative against common sense merely to satisfy an imported ideology of absolute gender equality without understanding India’s security environment. Of course, women have a place in police and that should be limited to women police dealing with women in riots or brown-skinned American degenerates like Trupti Desai when they try to turn India into a brown-skinned version of the Western cesspool, but not fighting against Pakistani barbarians outside and inside India.
1. Multiple flip-flops on Pakistani diplomacy — from “terror and dialogue cannot go hand in hand” as promised in the election manifesto, to currently following the clone policy of Congress, i.e. uninterrupted and uninterruptible dialogue no matter how many terrorist attacks happen inside India. BJP fanboys now shamelessly defend it by invoking the fallacy of authority, while they derided Congress as anti-national for doing the same thing.
So it can be established fairly certainly that BJP is not a pro-Hindu party or an actual Indian nationalist party with any sort of common sense beyond what its white masters deem fit to be progressive and appropriate. If you have any doubt, read this to understand what should be the demands to classify any party pro-Hindu. It is only the media which has built this image for BJP over a long period of time. At best BJP can be claimed to be a less anti-Hindu and less anti-national party than the Communist-Congress cabal. This is one reason BJP can be given some slack for now and should still be voted into power in state and national elections with a thumping majority if possible, because voting for other parties, especially the Communists, Congress cabal or its numerous clones like AAP, BSP, JDU and DMK, in such crucial elections is akin to Hindus committing harakiri.
May 11, 2016
How media sells secular demands as pro-Hindu
This is the second article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1 and Part 3.

The media and intellectual environment has been so anti-Hindu in India that most issues which pass off as pro-Hindu issues hardly pass the smell test when looked at carefully. Given this hostile environment, it is no surprise that entire generations of Hindus have been brainwashed and converted into such meek cows that they have lost the mental faculty to challenge and question the narrative which goes around as pro-Hindu.

The benchmark criterion to decide whether a policy is pro-Hindu or not is to look at it and ask the question: are Hindus the only beneficiaries of this policy? If a policy helps all Indians then it cannot be pro-Hindu, so call it a nationalistic policy. Similarly, all policies which bring Hindus to a level playing field with other religions are again not pro-Hindu as they only correct historical bias against them, so call them secular. Using this criterion we can now look at some long-standing issues to understand whether they are pro-Hindu issues or not.
1. Uniform Civil Code: It does not help Hindus explicitly in any way. Hindu civil law is almost modern and Hindus will hardly gain anything if Muslims cannot divorce their wives through triple talaq or have four wives. It is a secular issue and if India really is a secular country, as the libtards claim, then they should support implementation of UCC. Implementation of UCC will not really help Hindus but it will definitely bolster the secular image of India by dismantling religion-specific civil laws.
1. Article 370: J&K as a region is important for national security given that it can connect India to Central Asian republics and also provides a connection between India’s two big rivals, China and Pakistan. It is in India’s interest to integrate J&K completely into the country and wrest back PoK. So again, repealing Article 370 does not help Hindus alone and is an issue of national importance. Any person opposing it is helping Pakistan and China against India and weakening India’s security environment.
1. Right to Education Act: Hindu institutions are taxed under this law while minority institutes have no obligation to give quotas to SC/STs or follow the stringent requirements of this law. Minority institutions are thriving thanks to this law while thousands of Hindu schools have closed down. So again, repealing this law will put Hindus on par with other minorities. It is therefore a secular issue and not pro-Hindu in any way. In any other country with a basic framework of law, this discriminatory tax on schools operated by the majority would have been quashed by the courts on first hearing. It was in fact quashed by the courts before Congress brought in the 93rd Amendment to strangle and kill Hindu schools.
1. Temple Control: Money from Hindu temples is siphoned off and used by greedy governments while they pay Hajj subsidies to Muslims. Churches and mosques are free to receive all donations they can and use their own funds in whichever way they deem important. Hindu organizations, on the other hand, are helpless against this state intervention and watch meekly while government takes away their donations. So freeing temples and putting them on par with other religious institutions is not a pro-Hindu but a secular agenda, requiring the state not to rob money from temples and hand it out as Hajj subsidy.
1. Jallikattu ban: This is an assault on local traditions while minorities are allowed to mutilate small children under freedom of religion. A secular state has no mandate to dictate how religious festivals should be organized. Freedom to practise one’s religion and celebrate festivals in ways one deems important is not a place for government intervention, which again makes it a secular issue. If Muslims can slay thousands of meek goats on Bakrid, it reeks of hypocrisy when courts challenge healthy Jallikattu bulls under the pretext of animal rights.
Some of the above-mentioned issues have been paraded around as pro-Hindu issues, but a careful look demolishes the whole narrative. Most gospel truths about pro-Hindu policies are taken at face value by gullible Hindus, while actually they hardly help Hindus in any way. It is like asking a runner to start 20 metres behind everyone else in a 100-metre race. When this runner demands to start at the same position as everyone else, the thekedars in the racing fraternity rule against him, citing that they cannot put him on par with other runners as it gives him an undue advantage, completely ignoring the initial bias.

Given the above-mentioned policies don’t explicitly help Hindus, what can be classified as pro-Hindu policies?
1. Ram Temple: This is a long-standing issue and important for collective Hindu consciousness given the importance of Lord Ram in Hindu history. Hindus are the rightful owners of the land in Ayodhya. One random mosque hardly counts for Muslims and they don’t think twice before demolishing one in the Islamic nation of Saudi Arabia. It is Muslim iconoclasm which stands in the way of showing a big heart and allowing Hindus to build the temple of one of the most important Hindu icons at his birthplace. In case government decides to solve this issue in favour of the Hindu temple using its legislative powers, then it can be classified as a pro-Hindu issue. However, current litigation in the Supreme Court just makes it another property dispute rather than a pro-Hindu issue.
1. Ban on proselytization by non-Hindus: A policy which disallows missionaries from converting the local population would fall under this category. Banning conversions for all religions does not make it pro-Hindu. Only a policy which bans conversion out of Hinduism while allowing Ghar Wapsi can be called pro-Hindu. Under the current Constitution, covert policies can be implemented to stop missionaries. For example, in tribal belts under the garb of protecting local culture, missionaries can be denied entry into the whole region while allowing Hindus to target Christian converts. This is not explicitly pro-Hindu but covertly achieves the same agenda.
1. Birth-control restrictions on Muslims: To maintain demographic superiority of Hindus, it is very important to reduce the current boom in Muslim population. Any policy which explicitly or implicitly reduces Muslim births while having no impact on Hindus can be called pro-Hindu.
1. Force minority institutes to implement reservations: Reservation benefits are restricted to Hindus in most cases, so if minority institutes are forced to educate SC/STs, it will increase opportunities for Hindus while reducing them for minorities. If a 50% quota can be implemented in minority institutes, it can be called a pro-Hindu policy as it will educate Hindu masses while minorities foot the bill. This is not a big tax given minority institutes will still get a chance to preserve their culture, but at a small cost of educating backward Hindus.
1. Throw out illegal Muslim immigrants from Bangladesh and give citizenship to minority Hindus from Bangladesh and Pakistan.
The above examples clearly show that many other similar policies can be designed with explicit benefit for Hindus. But it is essential for Hindus to push back on unnecessary tags awarded to policies which do not pass the pro-Hindu criterion. Policies that do not exclusively help Hindus need to be declassified and placed under secular or national policy headings. Implementation of pro-Hindu policies will only be feasible after Hindus dismantle the narrative and repeal anti-Hindu policies. But the first step is to stop classifying secular policies under the pro-Hindu basket. This brings us to the million-dollar question: is there any political party which can really claim to be pro-Hindu?

Read Part 1 and Part 3 of this series.
May 10, 2016
Congress party needs to be obliterated for a better India

Indian National Congress is probably the most pathetic party in India and its voters the most shameless and self-respect lacking Hindus in the universe. Even Pakistanis stranded in India and their parties like AIMIM of the Owaisi brothers won’t come close to the treachery done by Congress against India and Hindus. At least, the Islamist brothers from Hyderabad are pretty honest about their opinions about India and Hindu society but Congress hides its rabid Hinduphobia and anti-national agenda behind the veneer of fake secularism.

When India got its independence in 1947, it had the same per capita income, poverty levels, literacy rate as that of South Korea, which got its independence in 1948. But today, South Korea is 20 times as rich as India with a poverty rate that should make every Indian who voted for congress and its socialism squirm in disgust. Congress wasted the economic potential of India under its pathetic socialist policies, which ensured that poor stayed poor forever without any way out of poverty, all under the pretence of preventing rich from exploiting them. By keeping poor poorer for almost 5 decades, Congress has built its legacy and wealth on the death and starvation of poor Indians. If Communist Mao had destroyed 50 million Chinese in cultural revolution, Indian National Congress have starved billions of Indians so far by denying their rightful opportunity at better life. It wasn’t done out of any concern or idealism either as the same congress party today also is the most corrupt wealthy party in India, with Italian waitress Sonia being the wealthiest Indian in India unofficially, even though she claims to have only a very limited wealth.

The injustices done to Hindus under the Indian National Congress is immeasurable. Indian National Congress is instrumental in destroying Hindu pride and the sense of identity among Hindus. Even now the pathetic worms in the congress party haven’t given up their ways to destroy Indians from within, by trying to destroy local traditions of Hindus, like Jallikattu or Shani Temple. The damage done by Congress party to Hindus is actually worse than the damage Hindus suffered under the Islamic and British barbarians. Congress being the cunning parasitic worm party it is, cleverly destroyed the Hindu pride, Hindu identity and self-respect under the name of secularism.

Congress party is so pathetic that it did not even think twice before collaborating with ISI and Pakistan to target Hindu politicians, just for political gains. They invented the term saffron terror for non-existent phenomenon, just to create an equal-equal with Islamic terror and framed innocent patriotic Hindus on false case of terrorism.

If Bharat Mata is our mother, then Congress actions of selling out Bharat Mata or her sons, just for staying in power and looting India, is no less pathetic than a vermin selling out his mother for profit and cash.

Other than the above mentioned problems, Congress has also undermined the efficiency of Indian armed forces by slandering them with allegations of coup, using their media prostitutes/presstitutes and demoralized them. There is no bigger sin than compromising national security and defence. By the time Congress left office, situation was so grim that Indian army reserves were down to just 20 days of ammo supplies in case of a war.

Such a self hating, anti-national and anti-Hindu party like Congress and its current clones like AAP, along with the corrupt ecosystem of parasites should be eliminated if the country is to have any meaningful future. Congress-Mukt Bharat is becoming a reality and it has been already eliminated and reduced to joke in states like Tamil Nadu, Bihar, Orissa, Bengal, Sikkim, Andhra Pradesh, UP etc. It is about time to get rid of Congress fully for a better future of India.

May 8, 2016
Why Hindus don’t get real Hindu party

This is the first article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4.

So, why do you think Hindus don’t get a real Hindu party which can enforce their cultural agenda? Brief answer: the naivety of Hindus makes them think about nation first and religion later. Although they have only one homeland in the world, they still struggle to make the optimal choice. This all-encompassing attitude of Hindus allows other slackers to pursue their pointed agenda while taking for granted that stupid Hindus will take care of the economy and infrastructure anyway. No surprise that every time some freak raises the bogey of real Hindu issues, he is shot down by the many “Economics is Everything” naysayers whose numbers have rapidly swelled in the Hindu fold now. The usual copybook response then goes along the lines: “Don’t you think rural electrification is for Hindus as well? You are mistaken if you think a poor farmer cares about Ram temple.”

Just to fix ideas: Hindus need to learn and start playing the realpolitik game. It’s not that bad economy and bad roads don’t adversely affect Muslims, but that is never an election issue for them as they know someone else, i.e. Hindus, will make sure that roads are built, the economy is bolstered and the nation is protected by Hindu soldiers anyway. So making economy, infrastructure or security an election demand becomes redundant for them. Actually, no matter how hard BJP tries to sell its developmental agenda, Muslims never buy it. Once Hindus start playing realpolitik and caring for their own agenda more than caring about the universe, they too will start seeing a change in not just politicians but also Muslim voting patterns because, for the first time, the spoiled brats will have to take up the mantle of nation building given that Hindus would no longer consider it their sole responsibility.

The case about Hindu and Muslim responsibility is like that of a cuckoo laying eggs in a crow’s nest. The cuckoo is the Muslim here and the crow is the hard-working Hindu. It’s not that the cuckoo doesn’t care about its eggs, but it outsources its labour to the crow and takes time to pursue its own goals, while the crow is left with both its own and the cuckoo’s eggs to attend to and fails to pursue its own goals despite being the bigger bird. Similarly, Muslims have cleverly intermingled their interests with Hindus to make sure it becomes difficult for Hindus to separate the two, like the crow can’t differentiate between its own and the cuckoo’s eggs. Once the crow starts saying, “You know what — I feel like behaving irresponsibly for a change and I don’t give a shit about any eggs. Let all eggs die,” the cuckoo will have to take corrective measures if it has to ensure survival of its species and make alternate arrangements for its eggs henceforth.

It’s the same with Muslims. They have outsourced development, economy, infrastructure, social harmony, soldiering and martyrdom to Hindus, so that they can themselves pursue their narrow goals knowing very well that everything else is taken care of by the bania Hindus. This arrangement has worked great for them. But Muslims freeloading on civilized society is not restricted to India or even the 21st century. You can go to any Western country and Muslims are usually among the lowest income groups and use social security to make ends meet. Why wouldn’t they freeload since civilized society will not let them die when they demand breaks for namaz five times a day and get fired from work to go back and live like parasites on social security? But this is not a new phenomenon, as reported by British officer Ibbetson in 1881. This is what he had to say:

Reading the above summary, it seems as if Ibbetson wrote these paragraphs just yesterday. This common trait of free riding explains Muslim lethargy and poverty across the world, where they simply exploit the civilization-building efforts of Kafirs while at the same time pushing their societies to adopt Muslim norms such as halal products and burqa through democracy. In military terms it is called “grabbing the enemy by the belt”, as espoused by Giap against the Americans during the Vietnam War. Vietnam mixed its soldiers with Americans in close-quarter battles to prevent Americans from using air power because they knew that if American bombs fell, American soldiers would die too. In the end, Americans decided to sacrifice a few soldiers, which turned the tide in America’s favour.

Similarly, if Hindus decide that they want something — like Ram Mandir or Article 370 — they can get it. But today if you ask a random Hindu about it, he would say, “Let the courts decide, else there would be riots,” knowing very well that it is not just Hindus who would die or bear the losses. Yet Hindus unilaterally take a step back, despite the fact that in case of riots consequences are usually far worse for Muslims. This is how this ideological subversion works and has been working since the time of Gandhi. The mantle of maintaining social harmony is placed singularly on Hindu shoulders while Muslims free ride and the likes of Owaisi and Azam Khan go around threatening riots and stop the larger community from peacefully pursuing its right to build a temple for one of its most important civilizational heroes, that too in his birthplace. Now, no one is advocating violence here, but this is how realpolitik works. Politicians know this very well. Once Hindus overcome this self-enforced mental burden and say, “We don’t care and let it happen,” both Muslims and politicians will have to change their tune.

Similar was the case in Gujarat prior to 2002 when riots were taking place daily but Hindus were told not to retaliate for fear of escalation. Dead cows were being thrown into temples but Hindus were told not to retaliate because “there will be a riot”. Then there was an attack on Somnath temple but Hindus were told not to retaliate because “there will be a riot”. It took the burning down of 56 saints in Godhra when Hindus lost their patience and said, “Let it be.” After that day hardly anyone ever dared to use that phrase to scare Hindus into submission again. The same word which had been their strength became their weakness after that. Not to mention, there have hardly been any mentionable riots in Gujarat post-2002.

Again, without looking at it as an incitement to violence, one can clearly see that the more considerate you are, the more attrition you face. Hit the reset button once and things can progress differently. Think about it: if Mamata gives a monthly allowance to imams while poor Hindu priests go hungry, whose fault is it — Muslims, who know how to bend the system, or Hindus, who don’t know their priorities? So a reset is needed in the political sphere, but for that Hindus need to unite and realize the importance of their identity. Once all political parties realize that there is a certain red line which cannot be crossed without paying heavy political costs, no one will take Hindus for a ride. No one would dare coin terms like “Hindu terror” for a non-existent phenomenon while hounding you with Islamophobia, even though most terrorist activities are [sentence incomplete in archived text]. All these jumlas that “the economy will improve, have patience” are like giving a lollipop to infants and nothing else. If Hindus themselves are complacent and keep saying they are very happy with BJP’s performance, even though it has not moved an inch on the cultural Hindu agenda, and overtly express their commitment to vote for BJP in 2019, then what makes you think BJP won’t start taking Hindus for granted?

If you don’t like parasites eating your tax money through doles, stop paying taxes — what will then happen to the parasites? But Hindus won’t play that game and continue to pay taxes so that “roads could be built” while whining about socialism. So if BJP keeps going down the path it is going now, what will it show at the end of five years? “We prevented some hypothetical riots and built some roads, but please give us another chance in 2019 to build Ram Mandir, abolish Article 370, bring UCC and repeal RTE. We will definitely finish them next time.” Well, Congress has been making promises for the past 70 years as well and even Manmohan can run the economy, so what is the difference between BJP and Congress? Is it just Congress plus cow?

This is the first article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4.

May 7, 2016
GoI should force missionaries to only convert Muslims
GoI under PM Modi cracked the whip on foreign funding of NGOs last year, which culminated in the orchestrated attack on GoI by local and foreign media through highlighting a non-existent intolerance debate in the country. Fake Church attack stories were planted to tarnish the image of the government. A large number of these NGOs with foreign funding are engaged in subversion activities in India and a significant part of this foreign money is channelled through organizations related to the Church. So fake Church attacks not only generated large donations for them worldwide, but probably also made GoI go softer on the conversion business of the Church. It raises the question whether Hindus can somehow manipulate the Church mafia for their own benefit.

The manipulation in this case means using Church money to fund conversion of Muslims into Christianity. To use this strategy one first needs to ask: why is it better to have Christians than Muslims in India? It is more than evident that Christians are usually much less of a nuisance than Muslims in any neighbourhood. Also, since such conversion will cut into the already present high Muslim population in India, it will divide the population among these two Abrahamics. This will make it slightly easier to handle them instead of just handling Muslims. What makes a few more Christians instead of Muslims even better is the fact that Christians have even lower fertility rates than Hindus and are more affected by the liberal memes of the West. So it would be easier to outbreed them than outbreed the Muslims in the long run. So, it can be established beyond doubt that having a few more Christians at the cost of a few fewer Muslims is a better deal any day.

Now comes the question: why is it beneficial for Hindus to ask or aid Christians to convert Muslims?
1. It is like killing one snake with another. Christians have money and want to harvest more souls, so if they can evangelize Muslims, it reduces their numbers which is better for India in the long run.
1. It takes the heat off Hindutva groups engaged in Ghar Wapsi. This trick can pit one set of Abrahamics against another without hurting the image of Hindus. International and local media, which lose no chance to paint Hindutva organizations as fascists over one Ghar Wapsi incident, cannot do anything if one minority group converts another.
1. If Muslims and Christians fight over it, then Hindus do not lose anything. If Muslims get too violent, they would further erode their image as the Religion of Piece.
Having outlined the benefits of such a strategy, the only remaining piece of this puzzle is how to implement it. Using one set of Abrahamics against the other is not an easy task, especially when they would always gang up against pagans, in this case Hindus. Look below at the flow of foreign funds to NGOs in Kerala. The northern districts are Muslim dominated while the southern districts are Hindu majority. Although all these funds are not related to conversion activity, they still give a rough hint that the prime target for conversion is southern districts like Pathanamthitta with large Hindu populations, as it has received significantly higher foreign funds.

But does this mean Hindus can do nothing and lose their brothers to Christians while the Muslim womb goes into overdrive? The fact is, if GoI is serious it can break this nexus and force the Church to only convert Muslims. How will that work?
1. GoI gives the Church the choice to convert Muslims or shut shop in India. Given they will still prefer to harvest some souls rather than none, they would choose to convert Muslims.
1. Future conversion licences will be based on the performance of these organizations in converting Muslims. If they are found to be engaged in activities of converting Hindus, their licence will be revoked under one pretext or another and their funds will be seized.
1. In return for the services of these missionaries, the state will provide them full protection during this activity, i.e. strict action against Muslims who harass the foot soldiers of the Church engaged in converting Muslims.
Given huge repercussions for not toeing the line of GoI, any Church would prefer to make do with whatever number of souls it can harvest. Also, it is cheaper to hound the Church using sleuths and use its funds rather than force the entire responsibility of Ghar Wapsi on Hindus.

Long-run strategy:
1. First use evangelization and Ghar Wapsi in low-density Muslim areas so that there are low chances of riots.
1. Once the above areas are clear of Muslims, then one can resettle Hindus and converted Christians in high-Muslim-density areas like West Bengal and Western UP.
The above two strategies can be reformed to make them more effective over time. In an ideal scenario, given that Islam and Christianity are majority religions in the world, a sensible GoI could have banned conversion out of Hinduism and forced a one-child policy on Muslims. But since we live in a non-ideal secular world, probably it is the best option to make friends with the lesser enemy in the short run and let them finish each other off.
May 5, 2016