Author: Yuga Parivartan yuga_parivartan

Abrahamic exclusivism and witch hunt
The disease of Abrahamic exclusivism is an undercurrent among all the memetic viruses that have developed in the Abrahamic world. The idea of exclusivism and chosen people not only leads to explicit wars but also leads to witch hunting of non-believers. This was as true for Christianity in the medieval period as it is still true for Islam and other Abrahamic derivatives like Marxism, feminism or environmentalism today. In the European dark middle ages, not only zealous Christians burned women deemed as witches, but also ostracised scientists who dared to propose theories that did not align with the Church’s world view.

Some qualities that define this exclusivism:
- Absolutism: Deep belief that there is only one absolute good way which gives moral high ground to believers.
- Missionary zeal to convert non-believers through all forms of propaganda and physical threat.
- Witch-hunting non-believers by explicit threats as well as coining fancy names.
Everyone knows about the religious exclusivism practised by Judaism, Christianity and Islam, so today we will focus on the new groups which practise this exclusivism and get a free pass under the umbrella term called modernity.
Political Marxism

Kalam wali bai noting the list of weapons to procure
- Absolute belief in Communist order that will achieve just society — an ideal utopia everyone should strive for, just like the permanent heaven promised by Abrahamic religions. This ideology simply replaced a post-death heaven with the mirage of heaven here on earth.
- It uses force and propaganda wherever needed and does not shy away from killing people, whether in Stalin’s Russia or through the Naxal movement.
- Killing non-believers when in majority and witch-hunting them when in minority. Non-believers are showered with the choicest of terms: evil Capitalists, bourgeoisie, and more. For knowing more fancy terms — just hear any Kanhaiya speech!
Feminism

Some peaceful feminists in one of their peaceful protests
- Absolute belief that all institutions have historically suppressed women. Only individual freedom for women matters in all cases; kids and family can go down the drain.
- The propaganda runs from universities and media. In the US, the fountainhead of feminism, 60% of college goers are women, but they still cry discrimination.
- It is not that difficult to lose your job and reputation if you annoy the feminist groups. Your work does not count if your ideology does not match with theirs. Fancy terms used to soil your reputation: misogynist, patriarchal, male privilege, etc. Try debating about unfair divorce or dowry law to get a taste of this medicine.
Environmentalism

Environmentalists praying to Varuna God to stop torrential rain
- Absolute belief that man is causing big climate change. While harm of local pollution is easy to prove, global warming is a difficult beast to slay.
- Massive funding has gone into research as well as propaganda. The moral high ground gives the right to save whales while letting poor Indians and Africans die for want of modern medicine and amenities. Probably, a billion people in India and Africa starving without proper food and electricity is regarded as nothing compared to the death of a few whales in the Arctic.
- Question global warming and you are a climate change denier. Support coal power plants and you are anti-tribal, while supporting nuclear plants makes you a supporter of big capitalistic firms.
Multiculturalism

Immigrants with legal papers waiting for bus to cross Euro tunnel
- Absolute belief that all cultures are the same and can live together in a societal soup. Immigrants can be brainwashed and assimilated.
- All religions are same, all cultures are same and all people are good — taught in schools to shut down critical thinking. It gets reflected further in political examples: Angela Merkel asked Facebook to censor anti-immigration posts in the self-proclaimed free-speech society called Germany!
- People who don’t buy the peaceful nature of Islam are called Islamophobes if they can’t shut their eyes to the barbarity of Islam. Those who don’t want unchecked immigration are called racists. In India you will frequently hear “Hindutvawadi” used as an abuse — but it is the same variant.
This is just a partial list of ideologies but you can see that all the Abrahamic derived ideologies sell the dream of saving the world from a real or imaginary problem to their over-zealous followers. Most of those affected by this memetic virus are hypocrites and rank opportunists and lose no opportunity to witch hunt those who do not believe in their ideology — and this happens while they talk about free speech in the background. The free-speech enthusiasts showed no sympathy for the free speech of Indian students in NIT Kashmir, but it was made a big issue in JNU.

One other common trait among all their followers is their extra-territorial loyalty. The communists from India supported China in the 1962 war. The same goes for environmentalists who block nuclear plants or coal mines under the direction of foreign-based NGOs. While economic development of India is supremely important, these people will collaborate with foreign powers to scuttle all development agenda. The less talked about Indian feminists the better. With the help of local and international media, they have effectively helped broad-brush India as the rape capital of the world, when on the contrary it has some of the lowest rape reporting rates in the world. They are more than happy to attend foreign conferences and call India the rape capital to get brownie points among western feminists rather than call out their bluff on statistics. About multiculturalism — we have the great example of Muslims living in India. For all talk of secularism, a lot of them still have extra-territorial affiliations which come out regularly in the form of bursting crackers after an Indian loss in sport, or overt aggression in support of terrorists or counter-terrorists in Iraq-Syria.

So next time when you are barraged by the kindest of hipster words, you can safely assume that you are under assault by one form of Abrahamic ideology. Then you will be given the only choice — to stand with the believers or the non-believers. Depending on your choice, either you will be accepted with open hearts and sold atrocity stories, or — heaven forbid if you still choose to not accept the monotheistic God — you will be witch-hunted. Your loss in the end would depend on where you stand in the social pyramid. Does this now explain why people in the higher echelons of society hardly try to lock horns with the fascist followers of these exclusivist ideologies?
April 8, 2016
Aryan Invasion Theory: Genetics revisited

This is a follow-up article on our previous article which presented recent genetic evidence to refute AIT. We will point out common misconceptions prevalent on the internet which stem from the fact that either AIT enthusiasts wilfully ignore new evidence or cherry-pick a few studies that suit their narrative.

This is a recent but long-winding article by MT which mixes various evidences. It makes sense to stick to genetic studies as according to the same author, archaeology does not matter for studying population migrations — “pots don’t speak”. For now we will also stay clear of linguistic arguments as they can almost always be made either way in favour of AIT or OIT. For those who wish to read more on linguistic arguments in favour of OIT, one can follow the research work of Srikanth Talageri.

For those who find it difficult to go through this entire blog post, one can directly jump to the bibliography section at the end to understand that most of the quoted research material is old and in some cases patently wrong for explaining the genetic movement of populations. In all the cases, MT uses genetic studies which show that there is similarity between Indians and Europeans, but none of those studies put a timeline on the connection. This has unfortunately become a favourite tactic of AIT enthusiasts — to use half-baked scientific truths to peddle their outdated fiction based on old genetic studies. This whole AIT defence was built on the assumption that migration happened only from the Caucasus to India and not from India to the Caucasus. Unfortunately, recent genetic studies are poking many holes in this theory.

The old genetic studies were limited by the resources available and could tell about shared ancestry but could not put a timeline on the direction of migration. The newer genetic studies, however, can answer both. In fact, the latest genetic studies published took full cognisance of the proposed Aryan migration into India from Russia as well as OIT. But after analysing the genetics comprehensively with larger, wider and deeper samples across all populations, the most recent genetic study came to the conclusion that the Punjabi R1a1a Y haplotype is the oldest among the Indo-European population and is likely the origin of the Indo-Europeans. The timeline of the genetics of the population is given by the SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) of the R1a1a alleles. Out of all the population groups studied from all over the world, Punjab showed the highest frequency of SNP variations — and hence is likely the oldest population group among those studied — with the frequency of variation decreasing from Punjab towards Western European population, with the lowest frequency of variations in the westernmost and northernmost Europeans. This clearly indicates that the Caucasus is not the origin of Indo-Europeans as the AIT fanboys want to believe.

Also notice that the above studies explain why North Indian populations have so much more in common with Europeans than South Indian populations — it was the North Indian population which migrated towards Europe. Also notice that North Indian population is composed of 60% ANI and 40% ASI, while South Indian population is 60% ASI and 40% ANI. This mixing creates some confusion, and AIT proponents usually use it to claim that ANI represents Aryans. But this is not true. ANI migrated into India around 45,000 years BC and ASI around 60,000 BC — and ANI and ASI are not synonymous with Aryans and Dravidians as AIT proponents want you to believe.

And this mixture would have happened before the IVC came into existence because IVC came to existence after 4000 BC — and genetics point out that no new gene flow came into India after 12,000 BC. The study by Lucotte G. points out the same fact: the Indo-European population (by virtue of frequency of variations in R1a1 SNP) is 15,000 years old in the Punjab plains, 11,000 years old in Central Asia, 11,000 years old in the Caucasus, 7,000 years old in Scandinavia and Western Europe. So all in all, AIT enthusiasts are just trying to use half information from outdated genetic studies to peddle their outdated fiction — explaining the genetic similarity between North Indians and Europeans, when such similarity is equally explained by North Indians migrating to Europe. And unlike AIT, this theory actually has newer genetic evidence to back it up without having to go through the logic fallacy of why Europeans would migrate towards India just when the ice age was ending, while Indians could have migrated north as the north got warmer.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

Another common mistake repeated in the above blog is using two parameters — lactose tolerance and the tallness gene — to somehow corroborate AIT. This is patently absurd as both lactose tolerance and tallness genes result in survival advantages to the population and hence cannot be used for studying natural flow of population. All genetic migration studies use SNP, which don’t give any survival advantage, instead of genes which do give some advantage. Does it come as a surprise that all genetic studies use SNPs?

Let’s say a population of mixed tall and short individuals from Punjab crosses the Steppes of Central Asia to go to Europe. The Steppes, being a more hostile environment, would have huge selection pressure towards taller individuals. So when the population crosses the Steppes, the tall population would be selected against the short — and when the population reaches Europe, it would be almost entirely tall. Now let’s reverse the scenario where Europe is the origin of the tallness gene and it crosses the Steppes into Punjab. Since most of the population in Punjab is already short or mixed (as per AIT), the invading migrants with their tall genes would mix with the short Punjab people. Punjab plains being less hostile than the Steppes might not have the same selection pressure, and so the tall genes would get diluted by mixing. In both scenarios, Punjab has a mixture of short and tall and Europe has tall — so tallness gene distribution cannot provide a definitive answer to the direction of movement. This is why population genetics and migration studies are done using SNPs which don’t confer or alter survival benefits.

All in all, AIT enthusiasts have limited time left to enjoy their falsehoods as new genetic studies will settle this debate once and for all. The fact that AIT was broadly accepted forced earlier genetic studies to match their findings and present results to corroborate the existing consensus. This happened as genetics could not speak about migration direction ten years ago. But it has changed now and we should see definitive and conclusive answers in the future.

April 3, 2016
Hindus having kids is the only way to save our future
Quantity has a quality of its own. No one demonstrated it better than the Allied forces during the Second World War when they won it by pitting sub-standard tanks and war planes against more modern but heavily outnumbered German war machines. So, if one can win a world war by pitting quantity against quality, there is no reason to expect a different outcome in a democracy where the game is rigged in favour of numbers. And this game is being played out in front of our eyes for the past six decades in India, but Hindus fail to recognize what holds for their future if they do not put sand in the wheels of the Muslim demographic war machine.

Does it ever occur to you why Muslims always maintain a higher TFR than the majority whenever they are in minority? Well, it’s demographic war — stupid! So the same Bengali Muslims who have a TFR of 2.1 when they are in Bangladesh and have totally annihilated the Hindu population, suddenly increase it to 4 when they cross the border and enter West Bengal. Similarly in Kerala they have 2 kids per woman when Hindus have 1 kid per woman. The trend is the same even for the developed world, where Muslim women almost always counter-breed white women. And every time this issue is brought up, politically correct people will quote that Muslim TFR is going down everywhere but none of them would answer why it is still over and above the rest of the population. Given that population growth is exponential, Muslims don’t need to have 10 kids per woman to establish demographic superiority. One more kid in the first generation translates to two more kids in the second generation and four more kids in the third. So if other groups just maintain their population, Muslims would increase their population four-fold in three generations. Now look at the map of Bangladesh below to see how it happened in India’s neighbourhood. The colour has consistently changed to dark green for younger population i.e. Hindus have gone below 5% of the population in almost all districts now.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

evol1 — Hindu demographic decline in Bangladesh

Hindus in India will face a similar future in large number of pockets if they do not wake up now. And those who cry about sickular politics today can only imagine what holds for them in Muslim majority neighbourhoods of tomorrow. So, what is the way forward to handle this issue? There are only two solutions:
1. Restricted one child policy for Muslims
2. Hindus counter-breeding Muslims
While policy 1 would be an ideal and less costly choice, given the lack of spine among Hindus in India and pandering to the secular agenda, it is almost impossible to implement. One can give long arguments in favour of policy 1 but given current circumstances one can rule it out. So, rational Hindus are left with nothing but policy 2 as the only remedy till some other better solution cannot be found or Muslims are reduced back to one-digit figures.

The only other nation which has understood this problem seriously and taken the bull by its horn is Israel. The Muslim TFR went down from 8–9 in the 1960s to about 4.6 in the 1980s but has stayed there almost since then. Israel, being a democracy, faced a similar problem to India and the presence of a large number of liberals ensured that policy 1 was rejected there as well. So, the orthodox Jews took it upon themselves to stem the tide of demographic reversal and started counter-breeding Muslims to remain relevant in Israeli politics. The current demographics show that they have been more than successful in their initiative.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

What does this mean for the future of Israel? The orthodox Jews have not only successfully countered the problem of high Muslim TFR but have also completely altered the politics of Israel. Given the small weight that liberals put on their fertility, they are increasingly replaced by the more orthodox sections of Jews. This means that in the future Israeli politics will move more to the right — and given the fact that orthodox Jews will control politics, they would be in a position to implement policy 1 if needed. So, Hindus who go into overdrive to support the misadventures of Israel will do much better if they learn something from the orthodox Jews rather than support all the stupid policies of Israel.

Once Hindus realize the gravity of the situation, they will have to put in huge efforts to implement this solution. They will face a lot of flak from women activists who would fight it tooth and nail and give arguments of quality over quantity. But sadly in a democracy there is just one vote for both the enlightened Hindu feminist and a Jihadi. No amount of fact-digging from scriptures and history about Hindu seers having just one or two but quality offspring can change the fact that numbers matter in democracy more than anything else. Also, one should not forget that unlike other civilizations Hindus had never been overly nihilistic or individualistic in their history, which helped them keep a demographic surplus in the face of Abrahamic onslaught for thousands of years. Unlike other Pagan civilizations, one reason for the survival of Hindus was their focus on family values and having enough offspring. This is much more important today in this democratic age — the day you lose the numbers, you lose your policy-making powers.

Having decided to go forward with policy 2, one still needs to overcome the implementation hurdles. Sacrifices will be needed by both men and women who have to give up many of their individualistic freedoms to help nurture bigger families. Also, it cannot be implemented at the cost of quality children and will need a grand Hindu collaboration to subsidize the education of these children. Again, one can learn from orthodox Jews who have successfully achieved it by developing their own institutions where they provide cheap education and jobs to their community members. This gives another reason to repeal discriminating laws like RTE, so that in the future when Hindu consolidation takes place, the state does not impose increasing costs on Hindu institutions.

The ball is now in the court of rational Hindus who understand that increased Muslim numbers is a problem for their survival in the long run. Burying their heads in the sand or waiting for Modi to do something will not solve this problem. Since policy 2 does not require the support of all Hindus, it can be easily implemented if a critical mass of Hindus come together. The only need will be to develop supporting institutions which can take care of this burgeoning Hindu population. In the end, 20–30% of Hindu population is enough not only to counter-breed Muslims, but to also make future Indian politics more pro-Hindu as this young population replaces the current generation of anti-Hindu liberals. The only question that remains to be answered is whether Hindus are ready to realize their Dharma and rise up to this challenge and beat Muslims at their own game.
April 2, 2016
What Hindus can learn from destruction of Chinese culture by CCP

From our visit to China, it seems that the Western conversion of Chinese civilisation is over — or at least, it will be in a few years. Going by the rate of deracination in the Chinese people, it seems that the Chinese are fast losing their connect with their 4000-year-old civilisation and are now being reduced to being merely a cheap copy of yellow-skinned Americans who have no culture of their own left.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

Typical pre-marriage photo-ops in the Temple of Heaven, China

There is no better way to understand the direction where they are headed than looking at their marriage ceremony and photos. The above picture is a typical marriage photo in today’s China and it demonstrates the Westernisation of China pretty well. Notice that the Chinese have completely thrown out their own customs during marriage along with their traditional dresses, which have now been reduced to museums. The Chinese in the marriage setting are wearing Western dresses and the customs followed in their marriages are increasingly getting Westernised. It is increasingly common these days to see Chinese couples doing pre-marriage photo-ops in Western attire from Beijing to Paris, demonstrating that they have completely fallen to the consumerism and narcissism of the West. Soon, China will look like South Korea, which already looks like a yellow-skinned American state — where the only place you will find Chinese civilisation will be in their museums, with the young Chinese deracinated to the point that they don’t want to connect with their civilisation even on a special day like their wedding.

What makes the above picture even more telling is the fact that the place where the above photo was taken is the Temple of Heaven in Beijing. Even Beijing, which is the heart of Chinese civilisation, could not protect one of its most important civilisational symbols. The Temple of Heaven is a 600-year-old temple in Beijing used by Chinese kings to offer rituals and sacrifices to the Gods, thanking them for their bountiful harvest and for blessing their society. This temple, which was a spiritual and cultural icon of China just 100 years back, has been reduced to merely a glorified museum today — filled with card-playing old people and selfie-hungry young people jumping up and down at the sacrificial altar. Can you expect similar defilement and sacrilege of Rome or Mecca? No one notices how the Communists of China have destroyed hundreds of Pagan and Buddhist temples of China in the last 100 years. Thousands of years of civilisation and history being reduced to mere selfie spots fuelling narcissistic consumer culture. The Western-dressed wedding picture is just the last brick in the wall capturing the fall of Han identity and culture.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

Defaced statues inside Longmen Grottoes, China

The Longmen Grottoes of China are another example of the Talibanism of the Communist government under Mao. This is a 2000-year-old Buddhist site where locals destroyed most of the statues inside the caves during the “Cultural Revolution” under state pressure — except the large ones. The large statues survived only because of the superstition of the locals, whose fear that the gods would punish them if they destroyed the statues was bigger than their fear of the Communist state. This site stands today barely surviving, only because of the superstition of the locals. Once again this shows how eager the Communists were in destroying their own past. Recent news seems to suggest that the conversion industry is working on overdrive in China. Given how eager the Chinese have been in destroying their own culture and past, it is pretty safe to say that the Evangelicals will reap a rich harvest of souls from their soul-harvesting programmes in China. With no culture to fall back on, the Church has a much easier job in converting the Chinese.

One can already see a large number of Chinese people who are starting to use Western names like Peter, Jack, Steven etc. to please their Western masters. Though it appears as an insignificant issue on the surface, it is actually a very important step in losing your own identity when large numbers of people start doing it in your locality. This act of changing names to suit Western civilisation is another example of Western domination of Chinese thought and civilisation — who are all but Chinese in name only. Conversion to Christianity now is only a formality for Chinese people. Also, given how most Chinese are not yet fluent in English, this problem is going to get worse once most Chinese become more fluent in English than they are today. It will only speed up the process of deracination of the Chinese.

How is it relevant to us Indians?

The Chinese experience greatly teaches us the importance of rituals and traditions in preserving our identity. Christians and Marxists know this well and that is why they attack our rituals constantly — be it our Sabarimala temple, or be it our Mangal Sutra, or be it our Durga Pujas. Christians attack our rituals like Pongal, Onam and Durga Pooja and want them to be secularised to deracinate us — making it easier for them to convert us to their own rituals. Marxists want our rituals and traditions destroyed, sometimes even masquerading as Hindus (like CPM in Kerala organising Sanskrit and Vedic festivals, or CPM of West Bengal organising ‘secular’ Durga Puja) with intellectual pretensions about how rituals and traditions are backward and hold us back. But the truth is, they understand the power of our rituals and ceremonies much better than we do. They know that if we lose our rituals, traditions and ceremonies, we have nothing to fight for and would be ripe for harvesting by soul vultures.

So the question is — are we Hindus going to learn from the Chinese experience? Are we going to discard our rituals just as the Adarsh liberals today want? Or should we start preserving our culture by preserving our traditions and rituals? The choice is ours to make. But if you do choose the former, be prepared for our Tirupati Devasthanam, Kashi Vishwanath temple, Thanjai Big Temple, Mahabalipuram Temple and other cultural and spiritual icons and centres to be trampled by the next generation.

March 22, 2016
Why Hindus should not shed any tears for Brussels terror strike

The Paris attacks on Charlie Hebdo brought together the whole world and laid bare the menace of Islamic terror which is usually ignored by the champagne sipping elites of the west. Indians, who have paid with their blood and freedom to face this monster, recognized the human tragedy and showed their solidarity by messaging “Je suis Charlie” and changing their profile picture to the French flag on Facebook to show their solidarity with France. But in the wake of Brussels bombings and expected rise in number of terrorist attacks in Europe, the question arises — do these westerns deserve Indian sympathy? The simple answer is – no.

India has been facing the menace of Islamic barbarism from at least 1000 years and terrorism is just a new manifestation of this old disease. It has raised its ugly head in independent India from time to time from Kashmir to Mumbai. Sadly, the western nations for most of this time have maintained a calculated silence or condoned these terrorist activities against the Indian nation state. The west has been using this as a state policy against India for quite some time now and its support for Islamic terrorism can be understood by looking at two dimensions — physical and ideological.

The first consists of outright support to terrorist organizations. Under the guidance of US, the western nations have cunningly outlined the concept of good terrorist vs bad terrorist. Without any surprise, any terrorist group which helps western hegemony gets bracketed into the first category while those who attack their interests get labelled as bad terrorists. The military support and aid to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and other ideological Muslim nations can also be put into the good bracket defined by the west. The mujahideen funded by US in Afghanistan against the USSR later drove back into Kashmir with tacit approval from the US. It was only post 9/11 that the US took active interest in dismantling the Taliban in Afghanistan, but has done various flip-flops since then. Other nations like UK, Canada, Germany and others are also not far behind in their support for Pakistan and other rogue entities and have frequently decided not to collaborate with Indian authorities citing one or the other reason.

The second and more hypocritical stand of the west has been to provide ideological ammunition and whitewash the crimes of Islamic terrorists. The terms like “terrorism has no religion” and “Islamophobia” have been mass popularized using the media and anyone who does not share this illusion has been witch-hunted for his views. Their ideological factories have churned out various victimhood theories to pin the blame on one or other local event and give cover to Islamic atrocities. So while the Gujarat riots are blamed for all subsequent terrorist strikes in India, the burning down of more than fifty Karsevaks at Godhra is completely forgotten and often labelled as an accident by foreign as well as local Indian media. This ideological sophistry has more or less closed down the debate on the barbaric nature of Islam. Since it is nations like India which have historically paid for this battle with their blood, the west had no reason to not use Islam to destroy India.

But now the Islamic monster has turned its gaze back on its European masters. Now they need to pay with their blood for all the intellectual dishonesty they have displayed during all these years. The question is whether the western Muslims will treat their hosts better in Europe than they have treated Hindus in India? If one were to go by the current terrorist attacks, it seems that western liberalism has hardly helped prevent the rot among their Muslim citizens, who have little value for the life of their fellow countrymen or themselves.

India has worked hard to control Islamic terrorism and still finds it difficult to wipe it out completely. Thus the only suggestion you can give to your western counterparts is — be ready to pay with your blood and freedom. There is no short cut. Also remember to install X-Ray machines on each of your metro exits in Paris and Brussels — the free (safety) lunch is over.

So coming back to the question again — should Hindus shed tears for the increasing number of terrorist attacks in Europe? The answer is a strict no. There is no reason for Indians to stand in solidarity with hypocrites who ignored our pain and supported a barbaric ideology both physically and ideologically. Since their past follies have now come home to roost, there is little that India can do in this regard when its past pleas were unheard by the west. Does it surprise you that the Hindu genocide in Bangladesh is never discussed by these same western nations who continue harping about Islamophobia? Well, the value of Pagan Hindu blood is probably too small to evoke any emotion from these western elites, compared to their Abrahamic cousins of the Middle East. They don’t deserve our tears or support because you can bet your life that they won’t give a damn when we bleed. They are more likely to mock our pain and lack of security than feel our pain.

As far as Hindus are concerned, this is a war between two evils, which have both been preying on us and killing us whenever possible and quite frankly, for a long time had been allies in killing us — be it during 1947 when Britain helped Pakistan, or be it in 1971 when the West helped Pakistan to kill millions of Hindus. So rather than shed a tear for these hypocrites and their own jihadi creations, Hindus should just let these two evils fight themselves out and let Karma have her course. The world could frankly do with less of both of these evils. This is neither our war to fight nor our war to take sides on. Frankly, neither of them are allies of Bharatiya civilisation for us to care. We don’t have to stoop to their level and mock them on their follies, but we don’t have to shed our tears for them either.

March 22, 2016
The Entitled Middle Class Princess Syndrome

In a post-modern society characterized by low fertility and few kids per family, each parent acts as a kind and all-forgiving Dhritarashtra thus giving rise to an army of modern Duryodhanas. Bad behaviour is not only tolerated but in many cases encouraged by modern parents. Each kid is sold the story of being a special snowflake where the whole world is supposed to rotate around them. Thus begins the story of entitlement syndrome which follows Gen X from childhood to youth. Unfortunately, the world bites young boys hard and punctures their ego balloon once they grow up, where they are supposed to perform or perish. On the other hand their sisters turn out to be pretty lucky and their snowflake image only grows over time — which we will refer to as the Entitled Middle Class Princess (EMP) syndrome.

What makes middle class girls special is that not only are they treated like princesses by their family members but are fed the constant victimhood narrative associated with being a girl in a third world country like India. The only difference is that unlike their poor sisters they hardly face any hardships and live a life of luxury supported by their parents. The protected environment provided by the family ensures that most of their wishes are fulfilled with little to no effort. This point can be confirmed by the praise that most of these middle class girls have for their fathers — specially on how they care for them. Also, as mentioned above, unlike men who still have to go and face the heat of the bad real world, middle class girls get a free pass even in social life from school to college to work, where all efforts are made to assuage their ego and mistakes are overlooked thanks to the political correctness regime and the gender card.

Finally, due to the system of arranged marriages and dowry, women still retain the right to work or not work after marriage, unlike men who have no choice but to be the breadwinner of the family. Just look around yourself to confirm that there are hardly any men who are jobless and have a good wife, while there are many young women who prefer to opt out of the workforce and still get married to a rich or powerful man. The use of the gender card to shrug off each failure while getting rewarded for the smallest accomplishments — both at home and in public life — generates extreme narcissism which these women then carry into their marriages, thus building extreme expectations that are impossible to be satisfied by future husbands. Given this EMP syndrome plus the tough anti-dowry laws, marriages are becoming a bad deal for middle class men, who have to pay a high cost in case they want to divorce one of these princesses.

Case Study

Let’s look at one such case of Abhinandan, an upper middle class Hindu boy who married Shruti two years ago. All was going well for the 28-year-old orthopaedic surgeon before he agreed to marry the girl of his parents’ choice. The girl belonged to a political family with her father being a big shot in local politics. The marriage took place with the usual grandeur that defines current middle class marriages. The soft-spoken and friendly doctor knew that marriage would change his life completely but did not know that it would be the biggest mistake of his life.

The problem started soon after marriage due to Abhinandan’s devotion to his family, which was something that Shruti did not like. The more she tried to pull him away from his family the more he resisted it tooth and nail. The constant pestering by his wife led to constant but small friction between them in the beginning, which kept on growing over time. The issue finally escalated to the point where Shruti aborted their three-month-old foetus and blamed the guy and his family for beating her up and causing the abortion. The behaviour of Shruti was common knowledge for all friends and both families but in the end the girl’s parents decided to side with her. The final result was that the whole family was slapped with 498A on false accusations. To make things worse, Abhinandan’s younger sister — who was not even home — was blamed for forcing Shruti to abort the foetus. Given the mass abuse of 498A, it is not uncommon to hear such stories where entire families including women are punished to extract revenge.

You would think that it is just another story but given the image of Abhinandan, it has left a sour matrimonial taste among many of his friends and well-wishers to the point that many of them are considering not marrying at all, or not marrying middle class girls. If the trend continues, middle class working women would have a tough time getting married as a lot of men would start preferring poor women who don’t suffer from EMP. This trend is very similar to the one seen in western countries where white men are increasingly opting to marry Latino or Asian women who are not as narcissistic as their western counterparts. Similarly in India, poor girls have seen the hardships of real life and would appreciate the hard work of their spouses for their family instead of whining about patriarchy and oppression while watching TV and checking Facebook inside an air-conditioned house. Also, poor girls who have seen that real life is about compromises and not all wishes can be fulfilled are less likely to break marriages and slap divorce charges willy-nilly. Another factor in favour of poor women is that they are a lot more grounded in our culture and reality and actually love having children — which is a biological duty of the family — instead of whining about how difficult it is to have children and manage them.

All in all, if this trend continues, middle class women may find it increasingly difficult to find suitable grooms in the coming years. Of course, thanks to hypergamy, men and their families would have little problem with marrying below their social status, unlike girls or their families who would find it difficult to marry their daughters to someone they consider below their standards. You can ask around to confirm that it is already getting difficult for parents to marry off their highly successful daughters. If middle class girls and their families want to stem this trend and stop this rot, they need to do a serious introspection on whether pampering their kids is such a good idea — and if living alone with a cat like western women is better than adjusting to live with their husbands.

Finally, this is not a men vs women issue as it is the parents who are to be blamed for this mess in the first place. This is a problem faced by society as a whole, as the women reading this would quickly realize that they are likely to have a brother or son of their own to be affected by it in the future. Similarly, men who cherish their duty of being fathers and brothers should give it a good introspection as well. The west, having created permanent fault lines between men and women in their society, is now trying hard to replicate this problem in India — which has always valued Dharma over rights and cherished both men and women for their contribution to family and society as a whole.

March 13, 2016
Ishrat: Did Congress sell national interests

Forget about all the scams you heard during UPA’s regime. Coal, 2G and Commonwealth scams were undoubtedly bad for the exchequer but can you bucket them under national treason? No. Ishrat’s case would go down in the history of India as an outright case of treason committed by the Congress Party to bring down one political opponent called Narendra Damodardas Modi.

All norms were broken and all hell was let loose just to witch-hunt one single person. The entire political spectrum used MSM to go after Modi and ended up compromising national security. This was achieved by pitting one security agency against the other and destroying many lives and careers in the process. It would not be an exaggeration to say that Congress did not shy away from cutting a deal with ISI to bring down its political opponent. Encounters are not uncommon in India — why was this one case of Ishrat Jahan given so much importance? Who will pay for this treason? And the most important question — will Modi drop the façade of Mahatma Gandhi to finally charge the Congress for sedition and bring the case to its logical conclusion?

It is not about political witch-hunt but about setting the standards for the future and what India as a nation can tolerate. While Gujaral only dismantled the Indian deep assets in Pakistan, the Congress party under Sonia Gandhi took it to a completely new level by offering an open playground to ISI and compromising national security. The role of other parties in this case is not so clean either. We all need to question what forced Nitish Kumar to portray Ishrat as Bihar’s daughter or Brinda Karat to inaugurate an ambulance service in the name of a known terrorist.

All attempts were made to silence the critics who tried to showcase the true story behind Ishrat. While journalists like Rana Ayyub were given free access to the power corridors of New Delhi, some journalists had to shell out money from their own pockets to uncover this truth.

Original embed unavailable in supplied archive — open a YouTube search for the referenced video.

It would be a great dishonour to the martyrdom of brave Indian soldiers if such sabotage of national interests is allowed for petty political gains. The nation needs to stand together and ask questions from Congress and other political parties as well as demand a judicial inquiry so that these anti-nationals are brought to book and punished for their treason. No action will only push India one more step towards being a banana republic, where foreign powers are free to meddle into local politics and extract geo-political benefits.

March 2, 2016
Kashmir Solution: China Style
Representative restoration image generated because no original image was embedded in the supplied HTML.

India is a weak nation when compared to other similar nations which can boast a two trillion dollar plus economy. The weakness of India comes from the many internal fault lines that are nourished by the stupidity of Hindus, which is then camouflaged and deflected by blaming crooked politicians. This leaves India just slightly better than banana republics, which live and die every day of the year.

The RW outrage on the whole JNU debate revolves around the fundamental issue of Azadi (Freedom) for Kashmir. Imagine what would have happened if China were in charge of this particular problem. People might have got a chance to chant Azadi statements, but under few conditions. One, Kashmir would have been integral part of China and two, they would have raised these slogans outside China because China is not known to treat its dissenters well. Is Tibet still a disputed area? Yes — only if you listen to Dalai Lama’s speech, because for all other practical matters the Hans have settled the issue. Similarly they have settled the fate of Uighurs in Xinjiang.

On the other hand, Kashmir is still a boiling issue in India. Look at the below video to further boil your blood. It was shot during the recent militant face-off in Pampore:

This is #Pampore for you! Mosques playing Jihad Songs! “At crosshair of Blazing Guns / We Know We are On Target”

— SALAAR (@SalaarOfficial), February 22, 2016

The video seems pretty authentic and can be corroborated by other videos circulating on social media. For Kashmir watchers, it is not a new event. Looking at it one thing becomes clear — there is practically not much difference between Kashmir and Afghanistan, except that the Indian Army manages to keep these savages under control.

Before we digress, what would have been the Chinese solution to the Kashmir problem? China would have solved it the way they have solved the Tibet problem — by settling Hans in Tibet. There is no better way to decimate your enemy than to do a demographic war. China is not even a democracy but it understands this much better than India. Even Pakistan, which holds on to PoK, has shown much more muscle than India and has settled many non-PoK Pakistanis in the Shia-majority areas in Gilgit-Baltistan:

Since the 1970s, the Pakistani government has encouraged the settlement of Pakistanis in Gilgit-Baltistan in an effort to shift the demographic and ethnic balance in the region. Under the GBESGO, many of these settlers were given formal citizenship rights in Gilgit-Baltistan.

It is true that India inherited this mess from the stupid and naive policies of Nehru who wanted to bolster his international stature by taking the Kashmir issue to the UN. But the question is — why are we still debating it 70 years post-independence when we know UN resolutions mean nothing for real powers? Russia just enforced its mandate in Crimea while ignoring the economic and military muscle of entire NATO countries. India is no Russia, but Kashmir is not in Europe’s backyard either and is already under Indian control.

The strategy to settle the Kashmir dispute:
1. All the technocrats and experts will try to explain to naive Indians (i.e. Hindus) that Kashmir is a very delicate issue and should be handled with kid-gloves. India is following this model for the past 70 years and it has solved nothing. It has only emboldened the Islamists and led to the mass hunting of Kashmiri Pandits.
2. Just follow the China model — settle Hindus in J&K. Article 370 should not be quoted as an excuse or impediment. Indians have given ration cards to illegal Bangladeshis, so it can be done for its own citizens settling in Kashmir. Article 370 can even be used by the Indian government as a cosmetic measure to claim that India is committed to preserving Kashmiriat, while dissolving it by stealth.
3. Another policy to pursue is trifurcation of the state of J&K. Once trifurcated, Ladakh and Jammu can be completely integrated while Kashmir valley can be forced to pay for its tantrums.
4. Achieve complete military indigenization. In the above mentioned scheme of things, the most crucial aspect is that India cannot fight an entrenched war for too long if all world powers get together to undermine India’s efforts. An indigenous military industrial complex is essential to avoid any external influence in dealing with internal issues. This is achievable with a 10–15 year time frame.
Kanhaiyyas and Omar Khalids are only the symptoms of a deep underlying cancer — Kashmir — that the Indian state has ignored for far too long. No matter how much India tries, it is almost impossible to settle this issue peacefully. Sooner or later, India will have to confront the ugly Jihadi ideology of Kashmir, otherwise Afzal Gurus and Kanhaiyyas will keep popping up. Good thing is India does not have to look too far for inspiration — it can learn the lessons very well from its neighbour right across the Himalayas.
March 1, 2016
Demographic Seize of Al-Hind
Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

The above image is more than sufficient to explain the story rather than engage in a discussion and give long explanations. The demographic battle is being fought in India using wombs and nay-sayers do not know what they are getting into. The Hindus have become less than 90% in the lowest age cohort in most of the districts in the country and this cannot be taken less seriously.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

Just compare the two above pictures and the pattern clearly emerges. In the lowest age group, the number of Abrahamic kids are going up as most of the regions are turning from light green ⟹ dark green ⟹ red. It is an impossible challenge to find a district where this pattern has reversed i.e. a green area turning white. It would be very naive to think that this is not deliberate and just happened by chance.

Now, lets look specifically on how the Muslims are doing as a group:

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

Three patterns clearly emerge:
1. The Mughal corridor going through the heart of UP and Bihar to link up with West Bengal and Bangladesh is going on at a rapid pace. The numbers in the 0–4 age group have swelled consistently.
2. West UP and Uttarakhand have established themselves as the new demographic warzones.
3. Assam and the north east are further sliding down from the Dharmic map. After accounting for illegal Bangladeshis, these numbers will only become worse.
All the theories about high HDI and low Muslim fertility rate fail the sniff-test after looking at Kerala, which is supposedly the communist and liberal paradise in India. Muslims are outbreeding both Hindus and Christians in this high HDI state. There are enough videos on the internet where you can still see mullas debating on the use of condoms, clearly explaining that high Muslim fertility has a religion angle to it. But the liberals want to bury their heads in the sand and also prevent others from looking at it by hiding these facts through sophistry. Kerala is just another addition to the growing list of regions that have high Muslim fertility despite relative prosperity.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

Zooming in a bit further shows that many of the red regions actually have more than 40% Muslim population in the 0–4 age group.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

The worse picture emerges from the urban areas where most Hindus have stopped having more than 2 kids. The Muslim reluctance for contraception is more than evident here.

Urban Hindus have given up on having children. Urban elections will be entirely Muslim dominated in a decade.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

— Yuga Parivartan (@yugaparivartan), February 18, 2016

The rural areas are still a bit better, except in West Bengal and Assam. If you see carefully, the large presence of Muslims in rural areas was the reason that it took forever to douse the communal riots in West UP and Assam.

Rural areas completely dominated in West Bengal and Assam. West UP and Kerala follow up.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

— Yuga Parivartan (@yugaparivartan), February 18, 2016

This means that within the next 15 years Muslim youth will form a majority in these regions, specially the urban ones. And don’t expect this trend to change even after Muslims achieve population parity in their local areas. After all, Hindu genocide in Pakistan and Bangladesh did not happen very far in the past.

Well, talking of Bangladesh — in contrast to the above, sample the Hindu population there under various age groups, as shown below:

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

A brief look, and clearly one could see how the ‘Hindu future’ is shaping out — or rather, phasing out — of the demographic picture there. The next time your Bangladeshi friend boisterously asserts that Hindus are doing very well and rather prospering more than the minorities in India, you know what to serve him piping hot!
February 17, 2016
Search for national language: Is Sanskrit the answer?

Rajiv Malhotra’s new book, The Battle for Sanskrit, which is going to be launched soon is a great attempt at rescuing the discourse on Indology and Sanskrit from the clutches of western pay masters, who strictly guard the academic debate on interpretation of Sanskrit texts and have completely boxed out the traditional Indian schools. But while Rajiv Malhotra is busy in dismantling the western hold on Indology, an equally important question that one should ask is about the continued use of English as the national language of India.

The need for national language

What defines a culture, if not its own language. The reason that the national language formed the most controversial topic during Constitution debates, should itself explain the important role of language for national polity. Given the high passions that marked these debates, the constitution assembly agreed to use English for fifteen years and then switch to Hindi. But when the time came for this switch, Lal Bahadur Shastri buckled under the pressure from Southern states.

Given that language evokes raw passions even today and forms an important part of identity, the debate on national language is even more relevant. English cannot embody the ethos of Indic civilization and is fast eroding native cultures around the world and not just India. It would not be an exaggeration to state that if you lose your language, you lose your culture.

The new language policy

Before starting any debate about national language, one needs to ensure that the existing local languages are given their proper due and the national language is not forced upon people in a top-down fashion.

The current policy that is used in the country is Local language+English i.e. people start with learning their local language and use English for administration and business purpose. But given the difficulty people face to learn a foreign language, the number of people actively using English fluently is still less than 10% of Indian population.

Given that learning outcomes are best in local language, it would be good to stick with local language as the first choice in every region. The new language policy should aim towards (Two Indian languages)+English as the goal for future students. Among the two Indian languages, the first should be the local language and second should be a choice among other Indian languages.

Sanskrit as the national language

The one language which best captures the ethos of Indic civilization is Sanskrit. The battle for Sanskrit will reach its definite conclusion only by adoption of Sanskrit as the lingua franca of India and its rejuvenation on national level.

Apart from the accolades showered on Sanskrit by modern linguistics, Sanskrit forms the bedrock of all Indian languages. It is only Sanskrit which breaches the language divide between North-South India.

Giving primacy to one language and imposing it on other regions usually generates hatred and seems imperialistic. But since Sanskrit is not spoken anywhere in India, it resolves this issue by default because unlike Hindi, even north Indians will have to make an effort to learn Sanskrit.

What makes this plan for Sanskrit really difficult is the feasibility and implementation since there are few Sanskrit speakers today and everyone else would have to learn it from scratch. There would be a backlash from people who already use English as according to many of them it would be a wastage of effort and energy when everyone else is switching to English in the age of globalization. This argument makes sense from an efficiency point of view but is efficiency a good measure when it comes to preservation of culture and nationhood?

No amount of GDP growth can compensate for the loss of culture and treasure trove of wealth that is currently hidden from Indians due to lack of Sanskrit knowledge. Also, revival of Sanskrit is one of the best ways to keep local languages alive due to its overlap with other languages while simultaneously fulfilling the goal of adopting a national language other than English and finally breaking away from colonial legacy.

February 8, 2016