Many Indian/Hindu feminists when confronted with reality check on destructive nature of feminism claim that it is implemented badly in the west and in India and hence few glitches can be ironed out through Hinduism. However, this is a flawed view as feminism is flawed at the very fundamental level.
Feminism at its core is described here as a Marxist idea of class warfare which pits women as a class against men as a class.
In most cases, feminists try to create a gender war when there is no problem to begin with. Their campaign regarding wage gap is one such example. The article argues that once corrected for different occupations and career choices, the gender pay gap largely disappears.
It further argues that in family-based societies men and women are not separate economic classes because household income is shared within the family.
This is what the feminist ideology gets wrong- it only views the issues of society from a female individualistic view instead of having a holistic view on the subject.
Feminism causes unnecessary gender wars
By turning social issues and practices into a gendered one, feminism turns simple issues into gender wars between men and women. The article uses dowry as an example and argues that both women and men can be objectified by marriage-market expectations.
When husband and wife start competing over who sacrifices more, family solidarity breaks down. The article argues that this conflict-driven framework contributed to fractured families and high divorce rates in the west.
Read Part II here.
Image Source and clarification: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/10/goddesses-hurt-indian-feminists-2013105104822923415.html
Representative restoration image generated because no original image was embedded in the supplied HTML.
The job of the media around the world is to report truth and promote awareness against malpractices and injustices so as to grow the society as a whole. But Indian media is filled with the vilest scum on the planet and they try to deflect issues of rape and sexual harassment done by their fellow presstitute cronies.
Look at the tweet of Sagarika Ghose, the queen bimbo of Indian journalism, on what she thinks about her fellow media presstitute Tejpal being involved in rape and sexual harassment:
[Sagarika Ghose tweet suggesting Tejpal should not be targeted for rape and sexual assault because many more such incidents happen in the world]
— Sagarika Ghose (@sagarikaghose)
She thinks that Tejpal should not be targeted for his rape and sexual assault against women just because there are many more happening in the world. How do these people justify such a stance? Should every rape allegation be downplayed and women be allowed to be raped just because it happens everywhere? Is this what these presstitutes think is empowering and protecting women? It is through instances like these when normal patriotic Indians get to know about the true nature of these parasites in India. Their outrage against rape and assaults against women is not for protecting women of India but rather to promote self-hatred among Indians.
Anyone who has seen the massive propaganda against India and Indian society for the past three years would have seen massive debates on rape culture in Indian society and how it is Indian men who are the vilest in the world — all thanks to the coolies of Christian missionaries in media. They paint a picture of how Indians are all rapists and that Indian culture is inherently evil and misogynist, even though this is completely contrary to the data at hand which shows that India is one of the safest countries for women in the world with respect to rape, with one of the lowest rapes per capita in the world. They do this to promote Indophobia — self-hatred among Indians — so that they will feel ashamed of themselves and their own culture. Once they feel ashamed enough, anything from misleading conversions to sprouting of civil war in India by the likes of John Dayal with his foreign funds can be justified.
The shallowness of Indian media on selective coverage can be seen by their complete silence when a convicted paedophile bishop was reinstated by the Church as a bishop in South India, while it was massively reported even in the western media.
So long as Indian society is under the influence of these coolies of anti-India Christian missionaries and vile rapists, even 1000s of Narendra Modis can’t save India.
Representative restoration image generated because no original image was embedded in the supplied HTML.
The rising awareness about the Muslim demographic bomb is causing sleepless nights for most well-informed Hindus — something that gets highlighted every time there is a mass exodus of Hindus from Muslim-majority areas, like in the case of Kairana recently. There are many strategies to counter this demographic siege, and maintaining high TFR is one of them. But as soon as any realist Hindu advocates high Hindu TFR to counter Muslim growth, one gets bombarded by various psychological defence arguments from those who are happy with the current low-investment and individual narcissistic scenario. Here are the different types of arguments given against Hindus counter-breeding Muslims in India — arguments which hardly stand close scrutiny:
1) The high Muslim TFR is a myth
People giving this excuse have buried their heads in the sand so deep that it is almost impossible to wake them up. No logical arguments can budge a person engaged in such levels of escapism. Any careful look at the map of India and the population of young Jihadis (oops — Muslims!) can clear this point without doubt.
2) Throw out Bangladeshis and control politics
This argument is again given by those who are steeped in naivety. If Hindu politics had been on top of its game, no one would be discussing the Muslim fertility bomb in the first place. But the fact is, Hindus live in a hostile country where Hinduphobia is very real. Control of politics should be an aim for the long run, but given the uncertainty on this issue, losing demographic superiority will only make it more difficult in the future. Moreover, increasing Hindu TFR is never a standalone measure and needs to be coupled with all other available options. Kicking out Bangladeshis is very important but it would not solve the problem completely — 15% of the population will still remain to fight this demographic war through the womb. Look at the so-called progressive heaven of Kerala, where Muslim women regularly outperform both Hindu and Christian women. The need is to simultaneously pursue all strategies: increase TFR, kick out BDs, and try to get hold of power.
3) Hindu women are no baby-making machines
This is the point of attack of entitled Hindu feminists who are trying hard to separate the fate of Hindu women from Hindu men. Whenever riots strike, while men are killed, women are forced to bear bigger costs. The rape and enslavement stories of Yezidi girls should send shivers down the spine of any normal person. So the fate of Hindu men and women are not separate — they will swim or sink together. Losing demographic superiority will only increase Muslim numbers, thus increasing the likelihood of crimes against women. The real question becomes — who represents the interests of Hindu women better? Those sold to liberalism who only want to enjoy their lives, or those who can look into the future and see the fate of future Hindu women? Having more children would mean women will be out of the workforce for longer — which again means men have to slog out more for maintaining the same standard of living. It is not just a sacrifice on the part of women but also men. It is only in the feminist mind that the fate of the two sexes is different — in the real world, it is intertwined.
4) Hindu men are timid
This is one of the most stupid responses on this issue. Some people even questioned whether TFR increase now could have helped those who were forced to flee Kairana. Well, given the environment in Kairana today, increased TFR will not change reality tomorrow. But had the Hindus in Kairana maintained a high TFR in the past 4–5 decades, it would have been much more difficult to dilute their numbers. TFR is a long-term strategy — demographic surplus in many areas has lulled Hindus into inaction. Any sane person would understand that violence should be the last resort in any conflict, and keeping demographic surplus would allow Hindus to solve this issue at the right moment.
5) Cost factor
Kids are expensive and there are no doubts about it. But this is another typical argument to chicken out of the situation. While Muslims have internalized the issue, Hindus still engage in the quality vs. quantity debate. Fact is, many Hindus have gone below replacement levels of TFR. In many regions — specially South India — Hindus are having less than 2 kids, while for maintaining population they need 2.1 kids per woman. There is no other way to put this: rich people prefer to have fewer kids to decrease their responsibilities even though they could afford them much more easily than poor. Western couples have no impeding demographic threat — Hindus have bought into this liberalism idea which is almost suicidal. The only question is: will they take up this challenge?
Hindus have to wake up now or their fate will go from bad to worse in the coming years. If Hindus don’t wake up and keep pretending that crucial factors like TFR do not matter, then they will have to face what Bengali Hindus are facing now in Bangladesh — and West Bengal. Bengali Hindus kept singing “all is well” and lost demography to Muslims in the 1880s due to low TFR, chanting their liberal secular nature and quality-over-quantity mantra. The quality kids produced by Bengali secular Hindus are of no use against the barbaric hordes motivated by a death cult with a divine mandate to rape kaffirs. So Hindus need to decide whether they are going to be pragmatic and real, and learn now to start counter-breeding — or listen to TFR deniers and let their future quality children and grandchildren be at the mercy of barbaric hordes.
Yugaparivartan carried out a big expose on evangelist roots of Audrey Truschke and how it explains anti-Hindu bias in her studies. After all one needs some ulterior motives to whitewash crimes of a religious bigot like Aurangzeb, something that Truschke has been happily doing for the past some time.
The Indian history written by Marxists for the past 70 years should leave no doubts in the mind of any sane reader that the whole field of history writing is wide open for pushing political agendas.
The article cites the Ayodhya dispute as an example of historians suppressing or dismissing archaeological evidence and argues that entrenched scholars can evade accountability for decades.
While it was expected that Truschke would receive support from her ideological allies, the article criticizes some Indian right-wing commentators who insisted that only a formal scholarly rebuttal was legitimate.
It argues that “writing a scholarly rebuttal” can become an endless trap when institutions and peer-review structures are controlled by hostile academic networks.
The article also raises conflict-of-interest questions about scholars whose family or institutional networks are involved in evangelical activity in India.
The way forward proposed is for internet Hindus to investigate the backgrounds and institutional affiliations of academics and media figures who denigrate Hindu civilization.
Ever since the social media buzz against the Hindu exodus from Kairana and BJP’s attempt at painting the issue as betrayal of Hindus in Uttar Pradesh by Samajwadi party CM Akhilesh Yadav, presstitutes were on overdrive and found a new way to spin it as a “law and order” problem. However, for a law and order problem, the problem seems to be very grave and obvious for any neutral observer and seem to affect only Hindu families at Kairana.
However, an even more sinister Hindu persecution is happening in Mewat district of Haryana, just 50 Kms from Delhi. The presstitutes at Hindustan Times had called it a law and order problem and even published a polished version of the issue. However, a law and order issue must involve all people instead of involving only the Hindus and Hindu families there.
As per the article, Hindu women are forcefully married off, raped and converted to Islam, sometimes even as second or third wife of the Muslims there. Hindu temples have all been destroyed and Hindu children are forced to learn Islam and Quran at the mosques and Jamaat centres in the district. The local shop keepers who are Hindus were not allowed to sell to anyone in their areas or were forced to pay massive amount of money to the Muslims there to even function in the area.
But what about the BJP government which took over? Has it done anything to wrestle back control of Mewat and restore the dignity of the Hindus there? Of course not. BJP being true to its colours has completely forgotten that it got elected on Hindu votes, having got the power now.
The central government gave the excuse of not being in power in Uttar Pradesh for failing to save Hindus in Kairana. They used this excuse to send a BJP team to investigate the issue having completely forgotten to keep Hindus safe in their own states like Haryana.
Unfortunately for them, the HT article published now on the Mewat issue on how BJP has not protected its own citizens in Mewat, even though BJP has been in power there for two years now. Whatever the motive of HT article be, it does raise the important question of what has BJP done to protect Hindus in areas like Mewat.
What do the usual BJP fanboys, who defend it with nonsensical excuses, have to say about the way Hindus are neglected by the supposedly pro-Hindu BJP in Haryana where both state and central governments are run by BJP? Hindus should do a serious introspection on whether BJP can indeed restore their right to proper Hindu government which will ensure a proper Hindu way of life.
Hasan Suroor, an Indian Muslim immigrant to United kingdom, who used to write for the Hindu and other mainstream media publications like The Guardian and is a millionaire, has been acquitted from the charges of paedophilia and sexual grooming of a young 14 year old girl. The 65 year old Hasan Suroor is a Islamic scholar and a self appointed “social critic” who is very well known for his Modi baiting articles and his condescension towards Hindus and pro-Hindu politics. He was caught in a sting operation by an anti-paedophile group on video engaging in sexual grooming of a 14 year old girl, with the intention of having sex later, which as per British law would constitute statutory rape, with or without consent of the girl.
Here are a few lines from the video which pretty much lays out in the open what Hasan Suroor was going to do to the 14 year old girl:
Man from the anti-paedophile group: Are you a British citizen or are u on a visa? Hassan Suroor: I am a British citizen. Man in the video: when did you come here? Hassan Suroor: Fifteen years ago Man in video: Therefore you know this country and are more than aware of the laws of this country, yeah? Hassan Suroor: yeah I know. But I have never been involved in grooming before.
The article argues that this undoctored video was not sufficient evidence for the judge to convict Hassan Suroor. It then criticizes a defence published in Outlook India that compared stigma against paedophilic desire with stigma against homosexuality.
The author argues that the leftist cabal in India protects its own sexual offenders and turns the issue into an abstract debate rather than focusing on child protection.
The article concludes by arguing that this incident exposed double standards in the leftist media and their willingness to protect their own even at the cost of children.
When the initial reports of shootings at a gay club in Orlando came up, there were very little details on the identity or ideology of the shooter involved. The brave objective Muslim journalist and a known liberal and secular Islamist Rana Ayyub decided to use this opportunity to mock Americans for their Islamophobia by asking them what they should call this terrorism.
She seems to have spoken a little too soon. Because news started coming in that the shooter might have been a Muslim and she went completely silent on the issue for sometime to await further details of the shootings. Turns out that once again the shooter was a Muslim, an American citizen who was born to immigrants from Afghanistan.
To whitewash Muslim crime, Ayyub started her usual tactics by claiming the existence of homophobia in all religions. As soon as news broke out that it was indeed an Islamic terror attack, she started tweeting about how gun control laws are bad in USA, which she had conveniently forgotten when she asked about how they should name the current terrorist attack.
It is indeed sad that instead of crying and mourning the innocent people who died in the attack the closet jihadists like Ayyub are busy building apologia for their barbaric death cult which executes gays and lesbians with impunity.
There is a mass exodus of Hindu families from the town of Kairana in western Uttar Pradesh and it has been sad news circulating in social media for the past few days. But none of the mainstream media picked up the story or ran it in the news despite reports that over 350 families have been forced out of their homes from Kairana in western UP. Apparently, the Idea of India and national integrity, secularism etc. doesn’t matter to the communist cabal in the media when Hindu lives are at stake. Media ran a story of a cattle thief being killed because the police were not taking action — the thief was a Muslim. But now 350 families or nearly 1500+ Hindus have been forced out of their homes from the Kairana town of Uttar Pradesh by the Muslim majority of the town, and it has been consciously ignored by the mainstream media.
Despite using Hindu sloganeering to come to power during elections, BJP too has conveniently forgotten its promises to Hindus after elections and has left them to rot. The recent example for this trend is the way BJP has behaved in the recent Kairana exodus of Hindus from Uttar Pradesh. BJP, true to its secular credentials and newfound minority love and development agenda, has decided that thousands of Hindus being displaced from Kairana is not worth its time nor attention and hasn’t called on the State government to take action nor made it an issue in the country. Somehow, 300 Hindu families being driven out of their homes is not worth their time.
If it had been any other community — Christian or Muslim — there would have been massive outrage by now in the communist and human rights cabal of India and the mainstream media. But since the victims here are only Hindus, they have as usual kept their mouth shut and are consciously avoiding any mention about the exodus of Hindus from the town. This is just the Kashmiri Pandit saga all over again — with Hindus being driven out of their hometowns as soon as they reach minority and Muslims reach a majority, just like it was in Kashmir. While it is expected that the Hindu-hating communist and Congress cabal is not going to help Hindus or even squeak about it, the silence of BJP on this issue is even more pathetic.
Either BJP seems to have forgotten that it is in power in the central government and is obligated to help the Hindus there as they are citizens of India — or they have sacrificed tens of thousands of Hindu citizens in the town of Kairana in the name of preserving peace and secularism. Is this what the “vikas vikas vikas” of BJP looks like — where Hindus do vikas and then get thrown under the bus to save artificial secularism so that Muslims can come and take over the generated wealth? Is this the reward BJP is going to give to a state which gave them 73 MP seats out of 80?
Kairana is less than 100 km away from Delhi, which makes this exodus even more shameful. It can only happen in India that such grave human rights violations are happening so close to the capital of the country but none of the mainstream media wants to cover it. The only mainstream channel to cover this exodus is Zee News:
The events in Kairana are a sign for the future of western Uttar Pradesh which is sitting on a demographic time bomb due to rapid explosion in Muslim population. Muslims in Kairana town must be made to pay for their atrocities against Hindus there — but unless Hindus find a proper pro-Hindu party, they will keep losing their land to Muslims like they are losing since 1947 from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Kashmir to present-day Kairana. Next time the secular communist cabal and the media shouts intolerance, remind them that if being intolerant is the only way to save Hindu children, sisters and daughters, then it would be better to be intolerant Hindus than to be media pimps who don’t think twice before selling out Hindu society for their ideologies.
The last article in this series talked about low sex ratio and dowry. Now, lets look at some other common salvo fired by feminists to support their presence in India.
Poor literacy among women
This problem is very similar in its origin to poor sex ratio- that is women are privileged that they are not required to work and provide for their families or the families of their in laws. A man in India, if he is married, is expected to find work and break his back to provide for his parents as well as his wife and children. The society actively chastises men who are dead beat and can’t earn a proper living for themselves and live either on their parent’s or their wives’ money. But this is not the case for women in India. Women in India have the privilege to either go to work and earn for their families or stay home and raise their children. No one can force them to work and if it is done, the society see the husband as evil while if the genders are reversed, and the wife forces her husband to work, then the society sees it as right and just. This is the reality of Indian society and there is no point getting around it and mincing words will not change this truth. This privilege women have in not being expected to work is also the reason why the female literacy rate in India is lower than male literacy.
Consider a poor family, who barely manage subsistence level lifestyle and have one boy and one girl child. Suppose that the family is poor and can afford to send only one of the kids to school(of any kind). What will make logical sense for that poor family to do? Sending their boy to college/school or their daughter? As far as the poor family is concerned, their son, if educated will have to work his back off to provide for both of them as well as earn enough to marry his sister away into a good family. But if they educate their daughter, not only does she will leave them and go live with her husband and his family, she is also under no obligation whatsoever to work for the family(be it the husband or the parent, since if the husband makes her work, he can be arrested for torture under Indian law).
Also, given the way majority women and their families usually select their husbands, it is harder for a poor family to find her a suitable husband because the educated woman and her family usually will not like marrying a sub par husband who is uneducated. This is another conscious decision on the side of the girl’s family to prefer to educate their son over their daughter. Logically too, this also makes the most sense. One can mince words from their ivory towers on why this is wrong or patriarchy or whatever, but this is the ground reality for most poor and lower middle class parents. Hence the notion that women are not educated because of misogyny is pathetic. If anything, the fact that women are given so many privileges including the privilege of not being mandated to work is the reason why many poor parents don’t send their girls to education compared to their sons, who are mandated to take care of their sisters and parents. And no, only lunatic feminists can claim that not being “mandated” to work is misogyny or oppression. Conventional or normal logic is that men working their backs off to provide for their women and children is not oppressing the women who live off their husbands work, taking care of their children. In the end, both husband and wife themselves have to decide what is best for their families on whether if wife raising kids from home is better or if both working to earn more money for their kids, albeit leaving the kids to rot alone without any guidance is better . Of course, the husband and wife can decide to both work and let their grand parents take care of their children. It will be a win win situation for everyone, but it is a topic for different day.
So, one can clearly see that this gap in education between women and men in India is because of poverty and other social realities including the fact that women are assigned no responsibilities whatsoever to take care of their parents, for the most part, and not because of misogyny as the feminist lunatics claim. Also, for fixing this problem, one has to fix the root of the problem which is poverty. Of course, when parents are wealthy, they obviously are going to send both of their children for studies and so fixing poverty would help solve most of the problems. The second step is to assign responsibility for women to take care of their parents in the society so that parents don’t feel that educating girl child is a wastage of resources for them, specially when they barely scrape by daily. This of course is not going to be accomplished by upper and middle class entitled feminist princesses who whine about patriarchy on internet everyday and use nonsensical terms like mansplaining, oppression, victimhood etc. Ever wondered why none of the poor women take these professional victims seriously even though all these feminist lunatics claim to fight for them? When was the last time you saw a poor girl holding placards shouting down with patriarchy in the streets? And seriously, is whining and bitching about patriarchy going to solve the poverty problem in India or are feminists ever going to increase responsibilities for women in India seeing as they themselves are after more power over men and society and are not really interested in taking responsibilities? Also generally the poor women hardly complain about not being able to work because they usually have to work to support their family unlike the middle class women who have the choice to not work and still claim victimhood on behalf of their poor sisters who don’t have this option.
It is also worth noting that as the Indian society will become richer, the emphasis on girl’s education will also go up naturally as a by product of prosperity. Why? Because more and more household works will get automated due to inventions like mixer-grinders, fridge, washing machine etc and hence many families will come to realise that a working wife is better for the collective good of the family than the husband working alone. This change can already be seen in states like Tamil Nadu, Maharastra Gujarat etc, where groom’s prefer working wives more than the ones which will be housemakers. As the success of two income households starts to show in comparison with the single income households, the neighbouring single income households will start to pick this idea up and become increasingly demanding for working and educated brides. This of course will have a huge impact on poor ignorant families in India because educating their daughters will then help them in getting married to a better groom in this changed societal reality. This can already be inferred from the increasing enrolment of women in the colleges in richer states.
This again demonstrates that society evolves because of natural social realities and economic progress and not because of feminist hysteria. One can objectively compare which would have made more impact on the rising levels of education among girls- changed social reality that working husband and working wife ensure better outcomes for family life or because of feminist hysteria against patriarchy? A poor family which understands the reality that two income households are much better at dealing with economic problems will be much more inclined and convinced to invest in education of their girl child rather than believing the virtual reality of angry feminist lunatics posturing in the media and academia.
Malnutrition
Malnutrition in girl children is another bogus argument the feminist love to bring up in a debate on why their man hating family destroying cancerous cult needs to exist in India. Although there is some gap in nutrition outcomes of girls and boys but malnutrition is not specifically a girl child problem but rather an Indian child problem. It is a cruel joke to insinuate that Indian girls are malnourished because of misogyny when 50% of all kids in India are malnourished and India does poorly on every social indicator for all children irrespective of their sex. The malnutrition problem in India is not because of misogyny but rather because of poverty. It is interesting to note that while the feminists harp about how misogynistic Indian society is, women in India live on average 6 years longer than men. What kind of misogynistic society is India where its women outlive men by 6 years? This is another example of how facts are manipulated to suit the feminist agenda and narrative. This narrative is really damaging because it takes focus away from important problem of poverty and low nutrition outcomes among Indian kids.
Rapes
Well this point is the worst among all the arguments presented for defence of feminism in India. Firstly, there is hardly anyone in India who supports rape. It is considered one of the worst crimes and the big crowd which emerged to protest in the aftermath of Nirbhaya case should settle the doubt in anyone’s mind on where the average Indian stands on the issue of rape. Secondly, feminism has not been able to do well on this issue in its origin countries. West has much higher rapes per capita than India, almost to the tune of 1000%. So if feminism is the antidote to the problem of rape, why does the west have such high numbers of rapes as compared to India? In fact, all the Asian countries with strong family values and Dharmic culture from India to China to Japan have negligible per capita rapes as compared to the west. None of these countries practise the militant feminism as in the west. So the real question should be- should India export some cultural values to the west to civilize them or blindly import another western ideology when it has failed in its own society?
Conclusion
The above examples clearly show that the feminist agenda in India is driven by those sitting in the ivory towers, the people who have little to no understanding of the ground realities of India. Given how feminism has failed the western countries and created a permanent wall between the two sexes, India should be very careful in importing these cultural memes which will destroy its family system thus paving the way for it to become a failed society. Thankfully the common people are much smarter than the local feminists and very well understand that destruction of family system will wreak havoc on their lives specially when there are no social security nets in this country.
Audrey Truschke profile is rising fast among the secular cabal in India and in the West. She has been in the limelight after publishing her book “Culture of Encounters: Sanskrit at the Mughal Court” about the Mughals. What gave her immediate fame was her defence of Aurangzeb as she tries hard to whitewash his crimes and give them a non-religious colour.
While as a scholar she is free to hold any views that she wants, her regular diatribe against Hindus in general is nauseating. This can be seen from the views she regularly expresses about Hindu nationalism, like here:
“Hindu nationalism has a particular history that is deeply tied to colonial ideas, as I have written about elsewhere. Hindu nationalism faces a significant problem, however, which is that it advances historically bogus claims. Hence the need to rewrite history arises.”
So essentially what Truschke wants to do is paint all reasonable attempts by Hindus to rewrite their history as bogus. While she agrees in some cases that there is a problem with the Marxist lens of history currently used in scholarly circles, she wants to replace it with something even worse by completely whitewashing the bigotry of Aurangzeb. Her double standards become clear by looking at the below tweet on Savarkar. While she wants to give alternative explanations to Aurangzeb’s bigotry and potentially hide it, she does not think twice before tweeting a half-baked article about Savarkar, which twisted his words to justify rape.
Her efforts to malign current Indian PM Modi can also be clearly seen in many of her writings and endorsements. All this raises important questions about her motivations behind the inane diatribe she vents against Hindutva politics and Hindus in general. So, what is her interest in India and Indian politics? Why does she continue to do hit jobs against an elected PM, that too based on frivolous charges which were completely rejected by no one else but the Supreme Court of the country?
Normally, in cases of conflict of interest, people generally declare their associations so that their views can be discounted given their personal interests in the issue. It is a general practice in financial dealings as well as increasingly in the media. For example, while reporting news about Reliance, Firstpost usually mentions its connection with Reliance to let readers decide how to weigh the views expressed in the article. Sadly, there is no such practice for scholars and they hardly ever disclose details of their personal associations or the donations they might have received.
Given that Audrey Truschke is becoming the next darling of the sickular media in India and her intense hatred for all issues related to Hindus, it becomes essential to look at her background and see whether this hostility is generated by an inherent bias against Indian civilization. Why else would a scholar take so much pain to whitewash the bigotry of Aurangzeb and pontificate to others about looking at the other sides of an individual who himself claimed to be a Ghazi and slayer of Kafirs?
So, who are the people behind Audrey Truschke? She is related to Pastor Nate, a soul vulture trying to win India for Christ as pronounced in the vision statement for his organization called Bless India.
Audrey Truschke is married into the Rehn family, to the son of Pastor Nate, whose original name is Nathan Rehn, and the family hails from Monterey.
Audrey Truschke herself comes from the Deep South and Bible Belt of the US, regions which are known for their bigotry and support for fundamentalist Christian networks. Both her husband, Thane Rehn, and father-in-law, Nate Rehn, belong to the fundamentalist Christian organization which wants to win India for Christ. Having connected the dots, it becomes amply clear that Audrey Truschke is a core member of this Hindu-hating soul-vulture Bible club. Since conversion in India essentially means conversion of Hindus, her views and writings are deeply biased due to her fundamentalist Christian connection. Her research thus seems to be motivated by the intention of denigrating the last pagan stronghold in the world by subverting Indian culture and history.
The cheap conversions these venomous snakes, like Truschke and her relatives, promote are pushing India into a civil war by changing demographics. Many people don’t know that the reason North-East India faces so many problems is because the Church and Christian majority there actively fund separatists. By pushing conversions, they wish to break India into several pieces since India is now growing into an unstoppable force to be reckoned with in the world. Wise Hindus should learn to look at these anti-Hindu forces and their backers in India like Congress and Communists and expel them or at least censor them from the country. A strong India needs a strong culture, not the poisonous conversions these people bring to our society.
To summarize, the background information on Truschke also raises serious questions about the credentials of big US universities like Stanford, which, even after knowing the truth about biased scholars like Truschke, kept appointing her. The least they could have done is force Truschke to declare her connections so that an unbiased reader can judge her hostility toward Hindus in light of those connections. The US showers praise on Modi and India in public, but behind the scenes funds such anti-India and anti-Hindu studies to break it apart. It accomplishes this by funding anti-Hindu figures like Truschke to build a narrative against Hindus. Truschke represents the real and ugly face of Christian and American secularism. For them secularism only means the right to convert Hindus and destroy their culture. The sooner Hindus realise this, the better. People like Audrey Truschke are mere pawns in this global jihad of Chrislamists against pagan India.
Credits: The story is based on the background work done by @peaceandy11 and @aparna. You can follow them on Twitter.
