Almost the full tenure of first BJP government is over and the elections of 2019 are looming over the horizon. But BJP has not even uttered a word on RTE, while five more cohorts of students have passed through the IOI system. This is a short post but explains the problem with BJP and RSS. There are two reasons-
(1) Lack of intellectuals- There is a strong anti-intellectual strain in the RSS. Having no intellectuals does not make a difference when you are in the opposition, but when in power, it destroys your policy making because you act as a headless chicken.
(2) Dishonesty- They never put out their points honestly, because they have an inferiority complex regarding their views. Being a rayta means that most would instinctively recoil from being associated with communalism.
This has led to a situation where BJP knows that a given law is anti-Hindu, but it never forms its opposition based on it being discriminatory and anti-Hindu. It always uses specious argument to delay that bill or gets it scrapped based on economics and caste.
If they want to win battle against IOI brigade, first thing they would need to do is get rid of mental blocks. IOI brigade would always try to paint bringing equality as communalism, but exposure to such propaganda and its refutation would make common people aware of RTE and its perils.
The biggest objective of controlling education and language is not to push in overt propaganda, but to use it to form affective associations so that people are programmed in such a way that they recoil at being associated with a certain concept.
Thus being unapologetic pays as it denies this pathway to your opponents. But is BJP ready to be unapologetic?
BJP government, being the Hindu thekadar right wing government, has recently announced a great plan for muslims- that it will start 5 universities exclusively for minorities where 40% of seats will be reserved for women of all religions i.e. mostly Hindus. Basically it means that the universities will have 60% Muslim men enrolled and 40% women of all religions enrolled. Since 40% all women is at the very least is likely to be representative of Indian religious demographic at large, 80% of the 40% will be Hindu women if not straight up higher since Hindu women on average have higher educational achievements that average sullis who usually are bred to be broodmares for future jihadis and hence education is among the least of their priorities. Here is the excerpt from above news:
The committee will work out details and decide. But students belonging to other than minority communities can also take admissions there. We will try to give 40 per cent quota to girl students to empower them. It will not be based on religion.
Unsurprisingly, Hindu feminists and non hindu feminists alike, who have previously hailed love Jihad and rape conversions as a way to fight against patriarchy have hailed this move as a way to help fight Hindu male domination just like the white feminist sisters fight white male patriarchy by wearing body bags (burkha) and proclaiming that they would rather be raped by muslim refugees than hear about racist men asking them to be safe. While that is unsurprising, what is surprising is the silence from the supposedly Hindu RW and RW publications on this issue. Even most of the supposedly Right wing Twelebs are maintaining an unholy silence on this issue, as if they are just paid BJP chamchas rather than people with genuine Hindu interest at heart. Then again, these people have rarely not kissed BJP’s rear on policy issues and hence its not that surprising either.
So what is the problem with this idea? As already explained, BJP wants to open minority universities with 40% quota for women of all religions. So it is fairly reasonable to assume that the end result of such admission policy is that it will comprise of 60% muslim men and 32% Hindu women, 7% muslim women and 1% women from other religions. As anyone with knowledge of Love Jihad can imagine, it is basically a program where BJP government will offer Hindus girls to muslim men for breeding future jihadis, just like wives of Amir Khan, Shahrukh Khan etc. They will spawn kids named Taimur Khan, Jihadi Khan, Kaffir Slayer Khan, Muhammed Aurangzeb etc and the self respect lacking Hindus who allow this to happen can fake their outrage on Twitter just like in the case of Kareena and her spawn.
When there are so many Hindu issues to be solved like Right to Education act which has closed down thousands of Hindu run schools every month, why is the Hindu thekadar government i.e. BJP pushing for sending Hindu girls to Muslim men under the guise of empowerment? For a supposedly Right wing pro-Hindu government, BJP has managed to do something which even Hindu haters like Communists and Congress have not done before- scientific whoring of Hindu interest. Does BJP think that turning Hindu girls into brood mares of the jihadis is the best way to solve Muslim issue?
This article might put off some BJP loyalists, who will support BJP and Modi if tomorrow BJP passes a law mandating that Hindus must compulsorily give their daughters to Jihadis just like how BJP passed a law making it illegal for Hindus to not give houses to Muslims if they don’t want to turn their houses into slaughter houses, and some rational Hindu Right wingers too, who might find this article offensive. The former can go kiss BJP’s rear like they usually do and ignore this news/article while for the latter .ie normal Hindus, this article being offensive is the intention of this article and if the words sound offensive, think of the reality of the situation.
The only other solution to this kind secular politics of BJP is to punish BJP by not voting for them to make it clear that the liberal/jihadis/secular votes they gain from pimping Hindu interests is far less than the votes of Hindus they will lose by such policies. If Hindus keep listening to the daughter selling brigade of BJP, i.e. BJP loyalists who will want BJP in power even if it sells their daughters to sullas like in this instance and keep voting for BJP under the bullshit notion of TINA(there is no alternative), then BJP has no incentive of correcting itself as it has more votes to gain than to lose because self respect lacking and dumb Hindus will continue to vote for BJP using TINA excuse. Frankly, if this BJP government, which funds Jihadis by using Hindu Tax money when it is supposed to be the thekadar of Hindus and Nationalism (there is no Indian Nationalism without Hindus), is the best Hindus can come up with, then Hindus might as well give up any hope for a proper future for them.
This is the fourth and final article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.
The previous article clearly articulated that BJP is not a pro-Hindu party or a proper nationalist party, so now the question arises: how can Hindus get a proper Hindu party? One method which we earlier suggested was to vote out BJP in local elections like municipalities, corporations and panchayats as a punishment for deviating from its pro-Hindu status and pro-nationalist stance, while voting it in to give it one more chance to perform at the national and state levels. Instead, pro-Hindu independent candidates can be voted in within their respective constituencies. This is one way to generate feedback to BJP and dissuade it from deviating from a pro-Hindu agenda.
The next, more important step is to infiltrate parties with pro-Hindu leaders at various levels by preferentially voting for them where possible.
Thirdly, if BJP does not serve as a proper pro-Hindu, pro-nationalist party, and if Hindus make it clear that any new party which is pro-Hindu has huge prospects in India, a new political party will emerge from the vacuum, much like BJP emerged from the vacuum in the 1980s, from a party of two MPs to a party with a single-party majority today. Such a hardline Hindu stance can be conveyed by voting in staunch Hindus like Yogi Adityanath, Kalyan Singh, Sakshi Maharaj and Uma Bharati, giving them massive electoral victories by consolidating behind them.
Finally, the worst thing Hindus can do is keep voting for BJP without any change in their voting pattern or any tactical thought behind it, even though that is precisely what BJP fanboys want them to do. BJP fanboys claim that since BJP is the least-worst option, it should not be criticized or punished by Hindus when it engages in jumlas for votes without doing anything for Hindus. What is the point of having BJP in power if it won’t do anything good for Hindus anyway? Careful analysis of BJP fanboy rhetoric will show how pathetic their position is. They seem inclined to believe that constant whining and bellyaching by fanboys and Hindus on social media like Facebook and Twitter will solve the problem of BJP not doing anything for Hindus. This is absurd considering that BJP is a political party like any other and will not care about what its fanboys think so long as it can get their votes. It has even made clear on multiple occasions that BJP’s top leadership thinks its fanboys are a nuisance for the BJP and its inclusive agenda.
Also, BJP and its fanboys are probably the only people in the whole world, besides communists, who ask what their supporters did for them, as if supporters owe them anything. Natural logic goes the other way, as political parties exist to cater to the needs of their voters. Hence any logical and neutral person can clearly see that BJP fanboy logic — whining and bellyaching on social media but voting for BJP anyway — will not yield any results, as BJP is more than happy to keep the pot boiling at just the right temperature to stay in power without actually fixing any problems.
Ironically enough, sometimes the same BJP fanboys go to extreme lengths to defend BJP’s position by claiming that it is a truly secular party and hence should not do anything for Hindus, even though they jump everywhere to silence people who ask for a new right-wing Hindu party to emerge. This only begs the question: why do they even bother to speak against the call for a true Hindu party or an alternative to BJP which they claim is a truly secular and not pro-Hindu party? The cognitive dissonance of these fanboys can be judged from their circular logic:
BJP is not perfect.
But there is no alternative to BJP.
Therefore assume that BJP is perfect.
Since BJP is now assumed to be perfect, we cannot criticize it.
But since BJP cannot be criticized, there will never be an alternative.
Given there will be no alternative, BJP is the only option, which takes us back to point 2.
Even hardcore Hindus think that a Hindu voting bloc will fall like manna from heaven or BJP will suddenly start implementing the Hindu agenda. But the fact is that until Hindus learn to punish anyone who tramples on their traditions, no party will ever turn pro-Hindu. The day they start punishing anti-Hindu agendas, every party will turn pro-Hindu. But to achieve that they need to put Hindu priorities above party or organization. How will it work?
Voters go vocal on pro-Hindu issues.
Congress and all others see it and turn a bit right on Hindu issues.
Given this opportunity, a new vocal far-Hindu-right party will emerge.
Looking at all this change, BJP will turn even more right.
End result: the entire political spectrum in India will shift pro-Hindu.
India will then become something like the West, which is secular but still proudly proclaims its Judeo-Christian roots. But if you keep giving breathing space to every BJP politician when they backtrack on their promises, then it won’t happen. Just look again at the cognitive-dissonance algorithm of fanboys above to understand why. Shivraj needs to pay for his Bhojshala rollback; the same goes for Fat-Novice on the Shani temple fiasco.
It would be better if Hindus learn something from Jews instead of fawning over them with irrational love, so that the Hindu agenda is obeyed no matter who is in power. Such a transition in politics would require actual work on the ground, which would send a message to BJP and other political parties that pro-Hindu policies and parties have huge potential to achieve power in India. The least destructive way to achieve it is by voting out BJP in local elections while explaining why they wouldn’t vote for sell-outs and brown-skinned Americans with Hindu pretensions. If Hindus start to build a consensus together now, either BJP will turn into a real pro-Hindu party or an alternative pro-Hindu party will arise within a decade, much like how pro-Modi consensus was formed within two years after 2012.
This is the third article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 4.
Anyone who follows the realpolitik of the USA would observe that Republicans and their religious right are pro-Israel to the hilt. For instance, the Iraq war was orchestrated by Republican president Bush to help get rid of Israel’s local threat, Saddam’s Iraq. Does that mean that the left in the USA is anti-Jew or anti-Israel? In most communities or groups, when the right wing is pro-something, is the left wing usually anti the same thing? Of course not. The Democrats are equally fanatical supporters of Zionism and Israel, and Democrats under Obama and Hillary destabilized the entire Middle East from Libya to Syria for protecting the interests of Israel, often wasting the overall geopolitical influence, power and wealth of the USA. Jews usually have massive influence over the countries they live in, often disproportionate to their numbers, which forms an interesting case study in simple realpolitik. How Jews get their agenda implemented in the USA should be a case study for all aspiring Hindus.
Hindu nationalists often have an irrational love for Israel and huge admiration for Jews and their resilience. But have they learnt anything from them for implementing their own agenda? No. For instance, compare how Jews try to play both sides of the political spectrum by influencing both Democrats and Republicans in elections, so that no matter who comes to power, both serve the interests of Israel and Jews. Comparatively, Hindu nationalists still can’t seem to make up their minds whether their loyalty is to the ideology and Hindu cause or the supposedly Hindu party called BJP.
If Hindus have to win this ideological war against the Abrahamics and their numerous cousins — Marxists, feminists, liberals, seculars, etc. — they need to learn these games from the Jews they admire rather than chanting pro-Israel slogans without caring for Indian national interests. Thus, the first step is to determine whether their loyalty lies with any organization or with their ideology. Blind loyalty to a party or organization will only lead to the betterment of the party and not their ideology, and vice versa. So even if BJP portrays itself as a pro-Hindu party, it is much better to have an alternative as well in case BJP fails to deliver on its promises to Hindus or meet the expectations of its core Hindu voters. The objective should be to force all parties towards accepting a Hindu core agenda, such that they get punished for violating a certain threshold or Lakshman Rekha.
To achieve this objective one first needs to make up one’s mind and analyse whether BJP is actually a pro-Hindu party or whether it is just a bubble created by media to keep Hindus bogged down and never let them realize what a pro-Hindu party should look like. To do this study, one needs to look at recent events and assess whether BJP passes the smell test of being a pro-Hindu party:
Shani temple issue, where Dev Fadnavis, a brown American with Hindu pretensions, decided to desecrate Hindu traditions just to appease an anti-Hindu feminist, even though the majority of common Hindus in Maharashtra, and indeed the whole of India, are against the idea, except perhaps his equally deracinated brown-American brothers stuck in Hindu India.
Bhojshala temple, where the BJP government of Madhya Pradesh sold out Hindus and their temple to Mullahs.
Right to Education Act, which is a special case of BJP not backstabbing Hindus but being outright anti-Hindu, where BJP actively supported getting it passed and till now hasn’t taken any interest in fixing it. In fact, the brown American with an Indian passport, Devendra Fadnavis, is actively implementing the RTE Act with zealotry in Maharashtra, causing the closure of several thousand Hindu schools, while his daughter gets educated in a Christian convent which is outside the ambit of the RTE Act.
NIT students were backstabbed by BJP for staying in power in Kashmir. While apologists claim that BJP is doing good by staying in power, any neutral observer should ask what good such power is in the hands of BJP if their ground supporters are going to be screwed by Islamists and anti-nationals anyway.
Not showing any interest in fixing academia in India, which is the fountainhead of Hinduphobic discourse, sowing seeds for sectarianism, often spewing venom against Hindus and justifying Islamic savagery in medieval India while simultaneously downplaying facts like the destruction of thousands of temples as fiction of Hindutva imagination, even though the Islamic barbarians themselves wrote books praising and extolling their rulers for destroying these temples and killing millions of innocent Hindus.
To make matters worse, the esteemed HRD minister Smriti Irani is more concerned about veg and non-veg food being served in Indian colleges than fixing the rot in today’s academia — going after useless brainwashed idiots like Kanhaiya rather than the academic snakes and ringmasters who brainwash newer generations of students through anti-national propaganda in institutes like JNU. Smriti Irani even gets applause from BJP fanboys when she proudly proclaims how she hasn’t changed a single book, academician, course or syllabus since she became HRD minister, to bolster her neutral credentials. The fact is that fixing academia is something which doesn’t need Rajya Sabha backing or a majority, but just political will.
The decision to induct women into combat forces, with Home Minister Rajnath saying that they will give 33% reservation for women in CRPF and open frontline combat roles for women in the Army. Should we not learn from the Ambur Muslim riots in Tamil Nadu, where many policewomen were molested and harassed? And this is an incident which happened inside India where Hindus are the majority. You can easily imagine the horror of sending Hindu women into combat against the Pakistani army, which is ISIS except in name. It’s not that they will refrain from rape or torture or treat them like saints, given the way they behaved in Bangladesh. BJP is once again more interested in being brown Americans with Hindu names, just like their fanboys who support this initiative against common sense merely to satisfy an imported ideology of absolute gender equality without understanding India’s security environment. Of course, women have a place in police and that should be limited to women police dealing with women in riots or brown-skinned American degenerates like Trupti Desai when they try to turn India into a brown-skinned version of the Western cesspool, but not fighting against Pakistani barbarians outside and inside India.
Multiple flip-flops on Pakistani diplomacy — from “terror and dialogue cannot go hand in hand” as promised in the election manifesto, to currently following the clone policy of Congress, i.e. uninterrupted and uninterruptible dialogue no matter how many terrorist attacks happen inside India. BJP fanboys now shamelessly defend it by invoking the fallacy of authority, while they derided Congress as anti-national for doing the same thing.
So it can be established fairly certainly that BJP is not a pro-Hindu party or an actual Indian nationalist party with any sort of common sense beyond what its white masters deem fit to be progressive and appropriate. If you have any doubt, read this to understand what should be the demands to classify any party pro-Hindu. It is only the media which has built this image for BJP over a long period of time. At best BJP can be claimed to be a less anti-Hindu and less anti-national party than the Communist-Congress cabal. This is one reason BJP can be given some slack for now and should still be voted into power in state and national elections with a thumping majority if possible, because voting for other parties, especially the Communists, Congress cabal or its numerous clones like AAP, BSP, JDU and DMK, in such crucial elections is akin to Hindus committing harakiri.
This is the first article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4.
So, why do you think Hindus don’t get a real Hindu party which can enforce their cultural agenda? Brief answer: the naivety of Hindus makes them think about nation first and religion later. Although they have only one homeland in the world, they still struggle to make the optimal choice. This all-encompassing attitude of Hindus allows other slackers to pursue their pointed agenda while taking for granted that stupid Hindus will take care of the economy and infrastructure anyway. No surprise that every time some freak raises the bogey of real Hindu issues, he is shot down by the many “Economics is Everything” naysayers whose numbers have rapidly swelled in the Hindu fold now. The usual copybook response then goes along the lines: “Don’t you think rural electrification is for Hindus as well? You are mistaken if you think a poor farmer cares about Ram temple.”
Just to fix ideas: Hindus need to learn and start playing the realpolitik game. It’s not that bad economy and bad roads don’t adversely affect Muslims, but that is never an election issue for them as they know someone else, i.e. Hindus, will make sure that roads are built, the economy is bolstered and the nation is protected by Hindu soldiers anyway. So making economy, infrastructure or security an election demand becomes redundant for them. Actually, no matter how hard BJP tries to sell its developmental agenda, Muslims never buy it. Once Hindus start playing realpolitik and caring for their own agenda more than caring about the universe, they too will start seeing a change in not just politicians but also Muslim voting patterns because, for the first time, the spoiled brats will have to take up the mantle of nation building given that Hindus would no longer consider it their sole responsibility.
The case about Hindu and Muslim responsibility is like that of a cuckoo laying eggs in a crow’s nest. The cuckoo is the Muslim here and the crow is the hard-working Hindu. It’s not that the cuckoo doesn’t care about its eggs, but it outsources its labour to the crow and takes time to pursue its own goals, while the crow is left with both its own and the cuckoo’s eggs to attend to and fails to pursue its own goals despite being the bigger bird. Similarly, Muslims have cleverly intermingled their interests with Hindus to make sure it becomes difficult for Hindus to separate the two, like the crow can’t differentiate between its own and the cuckoo’s eggs. Once the crow starts saying, “You know what — I feel like behaving irresponsibly for a change and I don’t give a shit about any eggs. Let all eggs die,” the cuckoo will have to take corrective measures if it has to ensure survival of its species and make alternate arrangements for its eggs henceforth.
It’s the same with Muslims. They have outsourced development, economy, infrastructure, social harmony, soldiering and martyrdom to Hindus, so that they can themselves pursue their narrow goals knowing very well that everything else is taken care of by the bania Hindus. This arrangement has worked great for them. But Muslims freeloading on civilized society is not restricted to India or even the 21st century. You can go to any Western country and Muslims are usually among the lowest income groups and use social security to make ends meet. Why wouldn’t they freeload since civilized society will not let them die when they demand breaks for namaz five times a day and get fired from work to go back and live like parasites on social security? But this is not a new phenomenon, as reported by British officer Ibbetson in 1881. This is what he had to say:
Reading the above summary, it seems as if Ibbetson wrote these paragraphs just yesterday. This common trait of free riding explains Muslim lethargy and poverty across the world, where they simply exploit the civilization-building efforts of Kafirs while at the same time pushing their societies to adopt Muslim norms such as halal products and burqa through democracy. In military terms it is called “grabbing the enemy by the belt”, as espoused by Giap against the Americans during the Vietnam War. Vietnam mixed its soldiers with Americans in close-quarter battles to prevent Americans from using air power because they knew that if American bombs fell, American soldiers would die too. In the end, Americans decided to sacrifice a few soldiers, which turned the tide in America’s favour.
Similarly, if Hindus decide that they want something — like Ram Mandir or Article 370 — they can get it. But today if you ask a random Hindu about it, he would say, “Let the courts decide, else there would be riots,” knowing very well that it is not just Hindus who would die or bear the losses. Yet Hindus unilaterally take a step back, despite the fact that in case of riots consequences are usually far worse for Muslims. This is how this ideological subversion works and has been working since the time of Gandhi. The mantle of maintaining social harmony is placed singularly on Hindu shoulders while Muslims free ride and the likes of Owaisi and Azam Khan go around threatening riots and stop the larger community from peacefully pursuing its right to build a temple for one of its most important civilizational heroes, that too in his birthplace. Now, no one is advocating violence here, but this is how realpolitik works. Politicians know this very well. Once Hindus overcome this self-enforced mental burden and say, “We don’t care and let it happen,” both Muslims and politicians will have to change their tune.
Similar was the case in Gujarat prior to 2002 when riots were taking place daily but Hindus were told not to retaliate for fear of escalation. Dead cows were being thrown into temples but Hindus were told not to retaliate because “there will be a riot”. Then there was an attack on Somnath temple but Hindus were told not to retaliate because “there will be a riot”. It took the burning down of 56 saints in Godhra when Hindus lost their patience and said, “Let it be.” After that day hardly anyone ever dared to use that phrase to scare Hindus into submission again. The same word which had been their strength became their weakness after that. Not to mention, there have hardly been any mentionable riots in Gujarat post-2002.
Again, without looking at it as an incitement to violence, one can clearly see that the more considerate you are, the more attrition you face. Hit the reset button once and things can progress differently. Think about it: if Mamata gives a monthly allowance to imams while poor Hindu priests go hungry, whose fault is it — Muslims, who know how to bend the system, or Hindus, who don’t know their priorities? So a reset is needed in the political sphere, but for that Hindus need to unite and realize the importance of their identity. Once all political parties realize that there is a certain red line which cannot be crossed without paying heavy political costs, no one will take Hindus for a ride. No one would dare coin terms like “Hindu terror” for a non-existent phenomenon while hounding you with Islamophobia, even though most terrorist activities are [sentence incomplete in archived text]. All these jumlas that “the economy will improve, have patience” are like giving a lollipop to infants and nothing else. If Hindus themselves are complacent and keep saying they are very happy with BJP’s performance, even though it has not moved an inch on the cultural Hindu agenda, and overtly express their commitment to vote for BJP in 2019, then what makes you think BJP won’t start taking Hindus for granted?
If you don’t like parasites eating your tax money through doles, stop paying taxes — what will then happen to the parasites? But Hindus won’t play that game and continue to pay taxes so that “roads could be built” while whining about socialism. So if BJP keeps going down the path it is going now, what will it show at the end of five years? “We prevented some hypothetical riots and built some roads, but please give us another chance in 2019 to build Ram Mandir, abolish Article 370, bring UCC and repeal RTE. We will definitely finish them next time.” Well, Congress has been making promises for the past 70 years as well and even Manmohan can run the economy, so what is the difference between BJP and Congress? Is it just Congress plus cow?
This is the first article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4.
May 2014 was the time when Hindus thought that their time had finally come when they gave an overwhelming majority to BJP in Lok Sabha elections. Sadly the dream did not last for too long as it is already two years since the LS elections but there is hardly anything concrete on the ground which can be used to say that BJP has worked on a pro-Hindu agenda. Yes, it is not anti-Hindu like Congress but it has hardly shown any respect to the genuine Hindu agenda. RTE is still hounding Hindu schools, temple money is still looted by the government, and on top of that NGOs and courts are mounting a direct assault on local Hindu traditions like Jallikattu, the Shani temple or Sabarimala. We hear noises about students shouting anti-national slogans in JNU but none of the ring masters got sacked nor any changes made to history books. On top of that Smriti Irani boasts it as her achievement that she has not yet touched the books circulated by the UPA government.
What makes it worse is the meek behaviour of BJP which does not think even once before abandoning its real Hindu followers. It has started to think that it was the development plank which made it win the last elections and it will make it win again in the future. Seems like BJP is hell bent on following the course it charted during the 2004 elections by projecting “India Shining” and getting dumped by the voters. So not only has BJP distanced itself from supporters like Kamlesh Tiwari in the real world, but it also frequently disowns its social media followers.
The reason that core Hindus find themselves in this position is because BJP knows that these supporters have no outside option other than BJP. All other options like electing Congress are not only anti-Hindu but are also much more disastrous to the economy. So BJP thinks it has a captive vote base as hardcore Hindus have nowhere else to go. Also, since BJP still follows the left-dominated liberal agenda once the elections are over, these Hindus are increasingly seen as a liability rather than an asset. This explains why career politicians don’t think twice before abusing them.
So, what is the way out? Core Hindus cannot let BJP walk around and renege on all the election promises. Thankfully Game Theory comes to our rescue. Dharmics need to use the “Stick and Carrot” principle from Game Theory to discipline BJP’s behaviour. In simple words — how does the Stick and Carrot principle work? Imagine you are the manager and have to ensure that the interests of your employees are aligned with your goals. The simple way to ensure this is to reward them for good behaviour (carrot) while punishing them for bad behaviour (stick). Sticking to just rewards or punishment alone will not ensure good behaviour.
In BJP’s case, electoral wins serve as the carrot but there is no stick to punish them when they deviate from ideal behaviour. This means Hindus need to act strategically and develop a stick to beat BJP into submission so that it implements their agenda. BJP thinks that its Hindu voters are captive and have no other choice and hence can take their support for granted. This needs to change and Hindus need to punish BJP for bad behaviour. The carrot is more than evident — the 2019 LS elections. But what should be this punishment or stick?
Core strategy:
Punish BJP for all deviations from the Hindu agenda by defeating them in all local body elections (like panchayat and municipality) till 2019 to send a message to their local leaders. This will generate feedback from the ground that BJP cannot take Hindus for granted. Small BJP leaders get benefit from local elections and so local elections matter a lot to them. Also, they need to be motivated for campaigning in big elections so top BJP leaders need to keep them in good humour. So, if you defeat these foot soldiers it will send a direct message to the high command in BJP that Hindus are not stupid. Don’t select Congress or AAP — go for good local candidates.
Let BJP win state elections so that it does not have the excuse of no majority in Rajya Sabha. Although this is a bad excuse — because like Congress, BJP too could have used CBI to implement its agenda — since BJP fanboys almost always cite this reason for BJP’s inaction it is essential to give them a chance to have majority in RS. Although it is most likely BJP would do nothing even with RS majority given how it has kept quiet on all core Hindu issues. Temple control and RTE are not even anti-minority issues to be shot down in RS if BJP plays its cards well. In any case, give them one chance to prove themselves.
Defeat high-profile traitors like Jaitley, Fadnavis etc. in state as well as national elections. There should be zero tolerance for high-profile sell-outs. Make sure that Dev Fadnavis is destroyed for his weak-kneed response on the Shani temple issue. Shivraj should be defeated for selling out Hindus on the Bhojshala issue. Similar punishment should be meted out to Jumla Rajnath and Jumla Irani for their inaction. Let local parties like Shiv Sena and other pro-Hindu parties win on seats against these big shots to send a clear message that Hindus have zero tolerance for deviation. Also ensure that hardcore Hindus like Uma Bharti and Yogi Adityanath are elected with thumping majorities to send an even clearer message.
Also, economic right is still a minuscule fraction of BJP supporters as most of its supporters are actually core Dharmics. So core Dharmics have all the shots to call. Punishing local BJP leaders in local elections will not dampen efforts to implement pro-Hindu policies at the top either. So this game is for Hindus to win. It is about time Hindus stopped complaining about democracy and started using democracy to their advantage.
Sticking to the above strategy will give Hindus a say in the formation of policies post elections and keep the top BJP leaders on a tight leash. They should be given the choice between perform or perish. If 15% Muslims can enforce their agenda and make politicians dance to their tunes, there is no reason that Hindus can’t do it if they are strategic. And if Hindus stick to this carrot and stick approach, even if BJP doesn’t deliver for core Hindus then some other party will rise to fulfil their political agenda in the future.
