Representative restoration image generated because no original image was embedded in the supplied HTML.
There is a fungus named Ophiocordyceps which infects Camponotus leonardi ants living in tropical rainforest trees in Thailand. Once infected, the fungus takes control of the ant’s brain and makes that ant climb down from its natural habitat, attach itself by mandibles to the underside of a leaf 25cm above the ground in an area with 94–95% humidity and temperature between 20–25°C, and die. The fungus, having done its job, starts growing hypha — and in a few days hypha emerges from the exoskeleton of the dead ant. When the fungus releases spores, it creates an infectious killing field of about 1 square metre directly below the ant’s body that infects any C. leonardi ant unfortunate enough to pass through it.
Anyone who is even mildly aware knows about the higher TFR of Muslims than other major religions across nationalities — with a black swan exception of Tanzania, and with Israeli Jews trying to consciously outperform Arabs in fertility and succeeding in 2017 for the first time. Though this book, Truth About Muslim Population Explosion in India, devotes the majority of its content towards expounding this matter using statistics, its main orientation is not towards red-pilling its readers about an issue regarding which they already have a faint idea.
The real purpose of this book is not only to provide statistical proofs about a universal intuition and projections about the future, but also to bring forth the dire situation of Hindu demographics. While people may have an intuition about the role of TFR, they may still be unaware of the interplay of other factors like average age of childbirth on population growth, female foeticide, government intervention etc. These facts have been deliberately muddled by the leftists to ensure that Dharmics act like sheep for slaughter and do not wake up until it is too late.
This book addresses all these concerns and also touches upon political problems that would arise in India due to the falling percentage of Hindu population — a prelude of which we have witnessed in Kashmir. It also busts the myth of why Muslims do not need to attain full majority before such events start to unfold before your eyes.
When combined with western SJW memes that a section of Hindus are very keen to adopt, it has ensured that not only are Hindus unaware of the direness of this situation, but are willing accomplices in their own approaching doom. While the leftist agenda of misinformation treats Hindus like mushrooms — feeds them shit and keeps them in the dark — SJW memes are like the Ophiocordyceps fungus which drives any civilization unfortunate enough to contract them to suicide. This process has been repeated many times in history and has been observed and commented upon by many people — like historian and philosopher Oswald Spengler in “The Decline of the West,” or anthropologists like Unwin in his research compilation “Sex and Culture.” If this situation persists, doom and darkness for Dharma in India is guaranteed. This book is thus a timely release to raise awareness about the impending complications for this nation.
Available at: Amazon India — Truth About Muslim Population Explosion in India
One of the newspapers highlighted about the big success of Muslims in IAS exam this year. Some 50 Muslims cleared the prestigious exam this year. This is what the article said-
But this year records of past several years were broken as nine out of 50 Muslims who cleared IAS exams secured their position in top 100 ranks.
Given that the interview and written marks for the final selected candidates is available online, YP decided to check if there is any substantial difference between Muslims and other communities. The data (first 525 ranks) reveals that Muslims on average get 13 marks more at the interview stage as compared to other communities at the interview stage.
IAS-scatter plot for marks for two groups reveal Muslims get more marks on interview stage.
The above figure reveals the bias at interview stage in favour of Muslims as compared to other communities. Each dot corresponds to one candidate, where x and y-axis are equal to marks scored on written and interview stage respectively by this candidate. Although, there are only 20 Muslim candidates in the first 525 ranks, but they seem to get higher grade than average on the interview.
The gray area shows 95% confidence interval and one can clearly see that at the interview stage marks are very different for Muslims and Hindus. If the two groups had same distribution statistically, then gray bands will cross at all level of written marks.
To look at how much more marks Muslims get on average, we run the following regression analysis:
Interview = β * written + Muslim + SC + ST + OBC
What does this table tell?
1. Those Muslims who are selected on average get 13 marks more than other general candidates on the interview stage. 2. SC/OBC get less marks on interview stage (6.65 and 2.60 respectively). ST candidates get 1.6 marks extra, but this result is not statistically significant. It is statistically significant only for SC candidates and they definitely get lower marks. 3. The slope β for written is negative, implying those with higher marks on written get low marks on interview stage. But this has to be interpreted carefully as those with low marks on both written as well as interview are not in this sample.
The average marks for all candidates on the interview stage are 167, with a standard deviation of around 15 marks. Since Muslims get 13 extra marks on the interview stage, they are almost getting one standard deviation extra marks than others. These 13 extra marks for Muslims means they are on average getting 8.7% higher marks than other candidates in the interview stage.
So, what should one conclude? Under Idea of India (#IOI), Muslims have the first right on resources as well as other administrative positions in India. The biggest take away from the above table is that Muslims are even above the other reserved category Hindus in the #IOI rankings. While the reserved category candidates get fewer marks on the interview stage, Muslim candidates get much-much higher.
Note: Download the file for analysis. Report in case of any questions or errors.
Today noted Bollywood lyricist Javed Akhtar in a tweet claimed that as per Census 2011, the divorce rate amongst Hindus was 0.76% and that of Muslims was only 0.53%.
A little search on Google reveals that the All India Muslim Personal Law Board is also making similar claims about divorce rates being lower than Hindus, especially in the context of the Triple Talaq matter being heard in the Supreme Court.
The National Herald website is also doing its bit to peddle this claim further. It says divorce rates amongst Hindus is 0.76% while the same for Muslims is 0.56%.
Secular newspapers such as Times Of India and The Hindu have also added their bit to this issue.
Now, let us look at the reality.
Source: Census 2011 – C-3 Marital Status By Religious Community And Sex – 2011
Table 1: Data for Total Population
Marital Status | Total Persons | Males | Females
Total | 1210854977 | 623270258 | 587584719
Never married | 570833969 | 322870527 | 247963442
Excluding never married | 640021008 | 300399731 | 339621277
Divorced | 1362316 | 452743 | 909573
Divorced + Separated | 4897518 | 1615191 | 3282327
Divorce ratio | 0.002128549 | 0.001507135 | 0.002678198
Divorced + Separated ratio | 0.007652121 | 0.005376806 | 0.009664668
Percentage Divorced | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.26
Percentage D + S | 0.76 | 0.53 | 0.96
Table 2: Data for Hindus
Marital Status | Hindu Total | Hindu Males | Hindu Females
Total | 966257353 | 498306968 | 467950385
Never married | 444973597 | 253100795 | 191872802
Excluding never married | 521283756 | 245206173 | 276077583
Divorced | 962810 | 344281 | 618529
Divorced + Separated | 3833495 | 1310576 | 2522919
Divorce ratio | 0.001846998 | 0.001404047 | 0.002240417
Divorced + Separated ratio | 0.007353951 | 0.005344792 | 0.009138442
Percentage Divorced | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.22
Percentage D + S | 0.73 | 0.53 | 0.91
Table 3: Data for Muslims
Marital Status | Muslim Total | Muslim Males | Muslim Females
Total | 172245158 | 88273945 | 83971213
Never married | 92081730 | 50970832 | 41110898
Excluding never married | 80163428 | 37303113 | 42860315
Divorced | 269609 | 57535 | 212074
Divorced + Separated | 654347 | 154655 | 499692
Divorce ratio | 0.003363242 | 0.001542365 | 0.004948027
Divorced + Separated ratio | 0.008162662 | 0.004145901 | 0.011658617
Percentage Divorced | 0.33 | 0.15 | 0.49
Percentage D + S | 0.82 | 0.41 | 1.2
Comparison table:
Status | Total H | Total M | Females H | Females M
Separated | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.67
Divorced | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.49
D+S | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 1.17
Observations:
The percentage of divorced amongst Hindus is 0.18 while it is 0.33 for Muslims.
Percentage of divorced + separated amongst Hindus is 0.73 while it is 0.81 for Muslims.
The divorced and separated percentages are extremely high for Muslim women, with the latter crossing the 1 percentage mark.
If you look at only the divorce rate then it is more than double among Muslims as compared to Hindus.
Conclusions:
Mainstream media, once again, has picked up random numbers and stitched together a narrative.
Some of the other numbers quoted in the above referenced articles are all based on random surveys done in a few select districts.
The problem of divorce is much more amongst Muslims than Hindus. It is especially so amongst Muslim women.
The lower rung BJP leaders every now and then are known to raise the bogey of TFR (total fertility rate) and exhort Hindus to increase their fertility. No sooner are such ideas floated than the entire media gets up in arms, leading to disowning of such members and comments by top leaders.
While the left chastises the TFR brigade by citing their ill-founded fears about Muslim population explosion, the neo-liberal supporters on the right — although acknowledging the problem — fail to react because they don’t or can’t match the resolve of Muslim women, as Hindu women are not captive breeders.
But truth be told, gullible Hindus hide their personal choice of having few kids by hiding under the intellectual veneer of excess population, environment-saving, women’s empowerment and other ideas that they have been spoon-fed since independence and have taken up with great zeal like any other nouveau convert to modern memes. The national and state governments too have played their role to a large extent, hence we find open support for this government propaganda which has put the responsibility of saving the world squarely on Hindu shoulders.
But how does the TFR actually look? We present the result for the two religions from the 2011 census for different states.
Representative restoration image generated because the original image was not embedded in the supplied HTML.
Representative restoration image generated because the original image was not embedded in the supplied HTML.
A few things to notice here. First, Muslim fertility is higher in almost all states. Second, the fertility is hovering around or below 2 for most Hindus — below replacement level. So Hindu population in these states will actually fall in the future. Third, it is not that Muslims are having too many children — it is just that Hindus are having too few children, which allows Muslims to keep the same percentage fertility gap (the only thing which matters for population share growth).
Another important point to note is that the percentage difference is much higher in some states which are important demographically — like Assam and West Bengal. The surprise addition is Haryana, with the highest TFR difference between the two communities. The current Muslim share of Haryana’s population is very low and so it would not impact right now, but if the trends continue Haryana too will join the list of west UP districts. Delhi was already surrounded by high Muslim population in west UP, Alwar and Mewat. If Haryana keeps going on this trajectory, the encirclement of Delhi will soon be complete.
But what is causing this great fall in Hindu fertility?
Representative restoration image generated because the original image was not embedded in the supplied HTML.
It is the urban Hindu who is showing the same trend everywhere — his fertility is hanging around 1.5 level. In some states it has gone down to 1, like in West Bengal and Himachal Pradesh. The low Hindu fertility in urban areas generates a much higher percentage difference between the two religions. Rural areas, though better than urban areas, are still lagging behind Muslim TFR.
Representative restoration image generated because the original image was not embedded in the supplied HTML.
While Assam and West Bengal are undergoing big demographic change and everyone is aware of the influx of illegal Bangladeshis there, no one wants to talk about the elephant in the room — the TFR difference between two communities in these two states. The percentage TFR gap is around 80% in Assam and 45% in West Bengal. It is easy to blame the illegals but one cannot deny the low fertility of Hindus in these regions as a big part of the problem. While Kerala and west UP would not have as many illegals as Assam or West Bengal, they too are facing a similar problem — and the question is why? It’s the TFR, stupid.
Key takeaways
Muslims have higher TFR than Hindus in almost all states
The absolute TFR is falling for the whole country — for both Hindus and Muslims
The absolute TFR difference between Hindus and Muslims is now at 0.55
The percentage TFR difference between the two communities is at 26%, down from 30% in NFHS3 (2005–06), but still very high
The TFR percent difference is still very high for Assam, West Bengal and Kerala, thus making them hotspots — the new addition is Haryana
Urban Hindus are fertility shredders — most states showing below replacement level TFR of 2.1
Hindus will be chiefly to blame themselves for the future change in demographics in most regions. The high cost of raising children is not an argument that will cut with nature. Nature is ruthless to those who under-breed. While it is easy to blame governments (which is needed, because they keep TFR numbers guarded or under the radar and don’t take action against illegals), a big blame lies with the individuals too. If you see the numbers of Muslims multiplying in your area, you should trust your own hunch rather than government. And most importantly — act on it.
Most of the Hindus & almost all of the HINOs(Hindu in name only) think & delude themselves that Muslims are ignorant, illiterate & unawares of sociopolitical scenario. Let us make things clear. All Muslims are literate & educated in their own language and not knowing English or a kuffar language is irrelevant to them. Knowledge (of course Islamic one) is accorded prime importance in Islam and every single Muslim is taught that since early childhood. Muslims know in & out about their dogma/faith/religion and have decent enough information about the rival faiths(including those of kafirs) even if its by cherry picking and used to deconstruct the kuffar religious principles.
This ignorance is manifested at the highest level of our polity. Can see it in how we handle religious Abrahamic jihad aka terrorism. Sending testosterone driven quran-filled adolescent jihadis to wage ghazwa upon kuffar Endia is the SOP of the terrorist state of Pakistan. Such terrorists must be summarily executed. Keeping them in jails for the vain hope that the terrorist state will be ashamed to death on seeing such “evidence” is nothing but suicidal imbecility. But we always do that and have paid heavily many times including that of IC814 in Kandahar. Its suicidal naiveté to think that highest level or track-2 talks with a terrorist state created specifically to destroy us will even try for any farcical peace. After Modiji’s “confidence building” with Nawaz in Ufa, Russia, and subsequent rekindling of NSA level & other official military+civil engagements, terror attacks have only spiralled up exponentially in Endia.
Now whenever the ignorance withers away its replaced by Hindu defeatist fatal obsession with Abrahamics and can be seen best in we demanding Aurangzeb Road be renamed to APJ Abdul Kalam Rd and not after any Hindu hero howsoever big or really important to us. Aurangzeb Road must be Chhatrapati Shivaji Road, Akbar Road must be Maharana Pratap Road, Babur Road must be Maharana Sanga Road, Humayun Road must be Samrat Hemchandra Vikramaditya Road and all this should’ve happened right after 1947 and before 1950. And we always err fatally in not following the dictum that no non-Hindu should be deified. And that does not necessarily mean all Hindus are patriots. In a current context if one sifts through the posts on Kalam ji’s demise you’ll know of the genuine heartfelt respect the “hardline hindutvavadis” have for him. But that should NOT translate into deifying non-Hindus.
Hindus admire Israel greatly but always fail to notice that the Jews do never place any non-Jew on a pedestal even equal to a Jew. And that’s one of the simplest few reasons they survive against all odds. This is the problem with Hindus. Its good to respect great men who are not Hindu, sure,but its suicidal folly to put them on higher pedestal compared to our own great personalities, saints and Gods mass-psychosis of which was seen in the aftermath of Kalam’s unexpected demise. No Abrahamic will ever do such for a goyim/heathen/kuffar under any circumstance howsoever “good-intentioned” or secular the latter might be. And this self-destructive trait of projecting a non-Hindu much larger and bigger than the great Hindu saints & Gods was shown by none other than a Hindu missionary org(RKM). Shows the utter condition of decadent delirious dementia Hindus suffer now.
Taking further this scary reality ahead we take the case of infantile reaction/approach of Sangh Parivar(led by RSS) to Abrahamism, Islam in this context. Muslim Rashtriya Manch, a daughter org of RSS, was last seen hyperactive with an “Ulema meet”; Ram Madhav, RSS’s loan to BJP, despite the J&K debacle of amorous dalliance with a pro-separatist political outfit is again seen hyper too as Modiji is to address a huge gathering at a cricket stadium in Dubai. What’s brewing up within RSS & its parivar?? The widely acclaimed custodian of Hindus & Hindu interests!! Some Ram Madhav cannot be doing this without the consent and permission of the Sarsanghchalak & Sarkaryavahs, the top two tiers of Sangh!! The fatal obsession of RSS & BJP with Muslims to “win over them to our side” will lead to another partition as the former just have not understood the fundamentals of abrahamic infection. On the surface things look hunky dory but RSS & BJP are now in the pre-partition congress mode leading the Hindus to halal slaughter houses in not so distant future if something radical does not shake up the Hindu core.
And to tell you frank,blunt & upfront you escapist, lackadaisical, haughty, lazy, deracinated, idiot, self-deluded, arrogant hallucinating Hindus & HINOs! You who underestimate the abrahamics (esp Muslims) and overestimate yourselves: even a ragpicker riffraff Muslim is far superior to you in being knowledgeable and aware about local & global sociopolitical plus geostrategic affairs compared to you supercilious, soporific & suicidal slaves who exist only to offer their necks for slaughter at the hands of Abrahamics. Better mend your fundamental physical and mental constitution or you’re doomed to be annihilated! Which either you do not know of or do not want to accept in minds or worse that you’ve already accepted you being halaaled at some point in time.. Amin!
Islam has cemented its position as a legitimate alternative to western civilization. Truth may be harsh but Hindus are not even in the race.
— भीमकर्मा (@bhimakarma) September 17, 2016
The article was first published here. The author tweets as @Shakra_Kulish.
The above quote delivers the hard hitting message of importance of demography in as few words as possible. If your offsprings do not show up, then they would definitely not rule the world. Demography moves very slow and hence most people do not see the impeding crisis before it hits them hard, which is one of the reasons that Yuga Parivartan repeatedly carries articles on importance of maintaining demographic superiority for survival of Hindus. Given the current environment this always boils down to suggesting Hindus on taking the lead and maintaining decent TFR to counter high Muslim fertility. Are there other policies which can work? Probably, but only to certain extent. Still the most robust among all of them is for Hindus to have enough kids. Does this mean they have to breed like rats and change their evolutionary strategy of raising quality kids?
One has to look at operation of Jihad doctrine closely to realize what Hindus are up against. The basic strategy works in the following way:
Create resource crunch
Cry victimhood and blame the rest
Organize and fight
How do you go and create resource crunch? A good way to create resource crunch is to have enough offspring who all will demand out of some fixed resource thereby creating scarcity. Although modern science has taken care of basic needs but it still does not solve scarcity problems on an individual level, specially for societies with low human capital and preference for doleouts. The vehement opposition of birth control by Muslims thus comes handy in creating resource crunch by having large population size. This strategy is used when Muslims are a minority and they rapidly breed to overwhelm the opposition.
In evolutionary sense, humans like other large species are K-selected because they produce fewer offsprings and trade quality for quantity. K-selected species are usually larger and live in stable environments and hence need fewer offspring to ensure that they pass on their genes to future generations. Number of offsprings is also restricted by the energy requirement for producing each individual, which you can also think of as pregnancy length. On the other hand, the r-selected species are small in size and produce large number of offsprings, which are cheap to manufacture, so as to survive unstable environments. So, r-selected organisms produce large number of individuals which also die off in large numbers and in the end the population size is governed by carrying capacity of the environment. For example, frogs have a large number of offsprings and many die before maturing due to resource crunch as dictated by the pond they live in.
In an extreme sense, Muslims are turning K-selection of humans on its head. While the biological restrictions still remain the same as for any K-selected species but the strategic game played by Muslims has increasingly become r-selected, where focus is completely on quantity rather than quality. So an average Muslim will produce larger number of offspring and engage in lower parental investment. Although Muslim women still take nine months during pregnancy like everyone else, but post birth investment is low. Average Muslim matures early because he has to support himself as well as his family and find some job. While his Hindu counterpart will waste time till early 20s earning various degrees, a Muslim will find the easiest employment for supporting himself and his family. The nature of job is unimportant as long as it brings some money and help building his own new nest and the cycle continues. This also gets reflected in lower average life expectancy of a Muslim compared to others.
Given biological constraints, this is the closest any large mammal can get to r-selection. The unstudied part of this evolutionary strategy is that this mechanism in case of Muslims is employed to generate resource crunch deliberately. Unlike frogs where r-selection is chosen by nature, Muslim strategy is a well thought out process. So, while Hindus might still believe in quality over quantity argument but it would not work since Muslims will push the environment towards resource constraint by increasingly building up a larger population. So, does Hindus have any other option than what some claim as breeding like rats?
To understand the possible strategies for Hindus, one has to go back to the 60s and look at it in the context of arms race between US and USSR. It can also be reformulated in terms of well studied game theory concept called prisoner’s dilemma. The goal of Muslims is to achieve demographic superiority, just like US/USSR had to achieve nuclear dominance over the other power.
Prisoner’s dilemma comes from the simple game with two players and two options. In the case of nuclear arms race, the two players are Nation A and B, which can exercise the options of Arm or Disarm. Since there are two options for each nation, it generates four cases. For each case, the payoff for A is in green, while for B in blue. In case both decide to Disarm, both get a payoff of 3 each, while if they single-handedly defect and build up an arsenal they get 4. If A knows that B will play Disarm, it is always optimal for A to arm itself and get 4 and reduce the payoff of B to 1. Since Arm is a dominating strategy, the two players who know this game will always choose to Arm instead of Disarm and get lower payoff of 2 each, instead of cooperative payoff of 3 each, in case each had decided to Disarm. This decreased payoff can be thought of as the investment needed in maintenance of nuclear stockpile.
The same example can be extended to the Hindu-Muslim demographic situation and replace options of Arm/Disarm with Have 5 kids/Not have 5 kids. Each religion is better off by having fewer kids and focus on quality of children, but having more kids gives chance of dominating the culture and wiping off the enemy. So, if one side is known to have preference for having 5 kids, the other has no option but to resort to lower payoff and have more kids. This is a prisoner’s dilemma style situation where both the players choose sub-optimal action. Understanding this basic game explains why US/USSR rationally decided to stockpile nuclear arsenal.
Although some caveats need to be mentioned for the demographic case. Firstly, Hindus have a majority right now and have all the reasons to maintain demographic surplus. If they lose demographic surplus, they would open India up to become next Pakistan. The game of prisoner’s dilemma still holds true even if one side has current advantage. Secondly, the propaganda against population has driven Hindus to become IQ shredders and this is an extreme case even for prisoner dilemma game. The “No child” or “1 child” option is below the replacement fertility level of 2.1 children/woman. Technically speaking 1 child preference, specially in south and urban areas, is not a great outcome even if there were no Muslims in the picture and there was no prisoner’s dilemma. So it is important for the average Hindu to reproduce at slightly above replacement i.e. 3 kids instead of 5 but 5 is the ideal given Muslim problem.
Hindus, while still in majority, already find themselves in a soup due to diversity in beliefs and traditions and mutually non-aligned interests. One could easily imagine the problems that they will have to face once they lose the only advantage they have right now, which is demography. The way US-USSR found themselves in confrontation with one another and lack of options other than stockpiling nuclear arsenal, Hindus too are caught up in this mad race, the only difference being the impact of demography are too slow to alarm and too difficult to reverse once set in motion. So while US-USSR stockpiled nukes, Hindus are still smug in their majority. The example of Assam serves as a useful example to understand how unchecked immigration of Bengali Muslims from 100 years ago have come to haunt the Brahmaputra Valley now and will continue to do so in the future. A demographic prisoner’s dilemma is played out in front of everyone’s eyes but Hindus do not seem to understand its manifestations. Also, if Muslims have decided to act like r-selected species, they are also more than happy to live in unstable environment and survive purely on the basis of higher fertility. The K-selected species of Hindus, unless they re-evaluate their strategy, will find it hard to survive given their pining for stable environment. Other than matching Muslim fertility trends, nothing less than revamping the whole constitution and putting explicit ban on Muslim fertility can change current demographic trends. Being stuck in a prisoner’s dilemma is not optimal, but this is where Hindus stand today and the modern Indian state cannot in any way stop the r-selection strategy adopted by the Muslims.
The world is constantly bombarded by Islamic Jihad but common people increasingly find themselves confused in understanding the core of the ideology and how it functions. Then they learn it the hard way when they are showered with bullets like in Orlando and Paris or mowed down by a big truck like in Nice. So are you an average Joe who wants to figure out what jihad actually is without having to read the religious texts or doing a PhD in theology? This article is for you, so read on.
Let’s start with a story to understand how the blame game and victimhood narrative starts. For this let’s go to Mankhurd, a Mumbai slums currently dominated by the Muslims. But Mankhurd was not so always. This notorious and filthy slum was populated by people from UP/Bihar and from the interiors of Maharashtra. In the 1990’s Shiv Sena built huge complexes for them in lieu of their land. While those complexes had the capacity for housing all the people of this slum, the areas surrounding these complexes continued to be populated over the years.
With the passage of time green flags started popping up all over the place, replacing the Shiv Sena flags – indicating that the non-Muslims had mostly left the filthy areas and moved on to the housing colonies. But the space they left behind was aggressively occupied by the Muslims. Now, you have these ugly complexes housing people and spread out all over the place and slums marked conspicuously by “hazrat-blah-blah” boards and green flags. Even if you take the ghettos of South Mumbai, there are one room houses with Muslim families that are seven or eight people strong. This as anyone can guess correctly is no mistake of the government or due to oppression by non-Muslims, but the result of the incessant Muslim breeding.
Now take this model to any country or even history. There is a pattern behind consistent miserable conditions of Muslims in all countries and the consistent blame game which they play. So how does it work? The basic doctrine of Islam is to deliberately follow an unsustainable plan leading up to a resource crunch later. This makes sure that the resources are few and those claiming them are too many which invariably leads to conflicts, as intended by the doctrine.
Want food? Kill that animal and eat it. Want sex? Marry that underage teenage girl and rape her without consent. Want more sex? Marry 4 girls, there is no one stopping you. Want children? Have 10, who’s stopping you. Want brides for your sons? Kidnap Kafir women, what’s stopping you? Claim Islamophobia and start a riot. Want land? Demolish a Hindu temple and occupy his land. Want even more land? Invade a neighbour and occupy his land. Everything has the halal stamp of approval as long as you believe in Allah and his messenger, so no need to worry about common courtesy, humanity or morality.
Once a Muslim is thoroughly done exploiting the resources available to him in his own surroundings and the number of people and their demands keep growing, there are going to be conflicts for demanding more resources, thus leading to politicians taking advantage of them by claiming that all the misery which Muslims face is due to evil kafirs who took all the resources and discriminated against the innocent Momin. So the Momin gets agitated and becomes a terrorist to take revenge. Not for a single moment does he think that the kafir is rich not because he has stolen anything from the Momin but because he follows a sustainable survival plan, practices planned parenthood, has less kids, saves money, sends kids to good schools, has better standard of livings, and hence his creed prospers. As opposed to that, a Momin has 10 kids, sends them to madrassas, they pass out with no practical real life skills and then complain that kafirs have occupied all jobs and left no jobs for Muslims.
So what is the next step? Build on this self-imposed disenfranchisement, organize into groups, and start fights with others. That is basically the Jihad doctrine. That is why all Muslims vehemently oppose any attempts to popularize birth control and family planning among Muslim women. To summarize the steps:
Create resource crunch
Cry victimhood and blame the rest
Organize and fight
It is a complete template for an eventual class war leading to a violent struggle, just like the one Karl Marx eulogizes. That is why Islam is not a spiritual belief like Hinduism or Buddhism. It is a complete political theory of organization of people for an expansionist political goal. It is more fair to compare it with other political ideologies like communism instead of spiritual theories like Hinduism. That’s why, if a person becomes more Hindu or more Buddhist, there is no problem to society, but if someone becomes more Muslim, then you better start building bomb shelters.
Representative restoration image generated because no original image was embedded in the supplied HTML.
The rising awareness about the Muslim demographic bomb is causing sleepless nights for most well-informed Hindus — something that gets highlighted every time there is a mass exodus of Hindus from Muslim-majority areas, like in the case of Kairana recently. There are many strategies to counter this demographic siege, and maintaining high TFR is one of them. But as soon as any realist Hindu advocates high Hindu TFR to counter Muslim growth, one gets bombarded by various psychological defence arguments from those who are happy with the current low-investment and individual narcissistic scenario. Here are the different types of arguments given against Hindus counter-breeding Muslims in India — arguments which hardly stand close scrutiny:
1) The high Muslim TFR is a myth
People giving this excuse have buried their heads in the sand so deep that it is almost impossible to wake them up. No logical arguments can budge a person engaged in such levels of escapism. Any careful look at the map of India and the population of young Jihadis (oops — Muslims!) can clear this point without doubt.
2) Throw out Bangladeshis and control politics
This argument is again given by those who are steeped in naivety. If Hindu politics had been on top of its game, no one would be discussing the Muslim fertility bomb in the first place. But the fact is, Hindus live in a hostile country where Hinduphobia is very real. Control of politics should be an aim for the long run, but given the uncertainty on this issue, losing demographic superiority will only make it more difficult in the future. Moreover, increasing Hindu TFR is never a standalone measure and needs to be coupled with all other available options. Kicking out Bangladeshis is very important but it would not solve the problem completely — 15% of the population will still remain to fight this demographic war through the womb. Look at the so-called progressive heaven of Kerala, where Muslim women regularly outperform both Hindu and Christian women. The need is to simultaneously pursue all strategies: increase TFR, kick out BDs, and try to get hold of power.
3) Hindu women are no baby-making machines
This is the point of attack of entitled Hindu feminists who are trying hard to separate the fate of Hindu women from Hindu men. Whenever riots strike, while men are killed, women are forced to bear bigger costs. The rape and enslavement stories of Yezidi girls should send shivers down the spine of any normal person. So the fate of Hindu men and women are not separate — they will swim or sink together. Losing demographic superiority will only increase Muslim numbers, thus increasing the likelihood of crimes against women. The real question becomes — who represents the interests of Hindu women better? Those sold to liberalism who only want to enjoy their lives, or those who can look into the future and see the fate of future Hindu women? Having more children would mean women will be out of the workforce for longer — which again means men have to slog out more for maintaining the same standard of living. It is not just a sacrifice on the part of women but also men. It is only in the feminist mind that the fate of the two sexes is different — in the real world, it is intertwined.
4) Hindu men are timid
This is one of the most stupid responses on this issue. Some people even questioned whether TFR increase now could have helped those who were forced to flee Kairana. Well, given the environment in Kairana today, increased TFR will not change reality tomorrow. But had the Hindus in Kairana maintained a high TFR in the past 4–5 decades, it would have been much more difficult to dilute their numbers. TFR is a long-term strategy — demographic surplus in many areas has lulled Hindus into inaction. Any sane person would understand that violence should be the last resort in any conflict, and keeping demographic surplus would allow Hindus to solve this issue at the right moment.
5) Cost factor
Kids are expensive and there are no doubts about it. But this is another typical argument to chicken out of the situation. While Muslims have internalized the issue, Hindus still engage in the quality vs. quantity debate. Fact is, many Hindus have gone below replacement levels of TFR. In many regions — specially South India — Hindus are having less than 2 kids, while for maintaining population they need 2.1 kids per woman. There is no other way to put this: rich people prefer to have fewer kids to decrease their responsibilities even though they could afford them much more easily than poor. Western couples have no impeding demographic threat — Hindus have bought into this liberalism idea which is almost suicidal. The only question is: will they take up this challenge?
Hindus have to wake up now or their fate will go from bad to worse in the coming years. If Hindus don’t wake up and keep pretending that crucial factors like TFR do not matter, then they will have to face what Bengali Hindus are facing now in Bangladesh — and West Bengal. Bengali Hindus kept singing “all is well” and lost demography to Muslims in the 1880s due to low TFR, chanting their liberal secular nature and quality-over-quantity mantra. The quality kids produced by Bengali secular Hindus are of no use against the barbaric hordes motivated by a death cult with a divine mandate to rape kaffirs. So Hindus need to decide whether they are going to be pragmatic and real, and learn now to start counter-breeding — or listen to TFR deniers and let their future quality children and grandchildren be at the mercy of barbaric hordes.
The peaceful Indian Muslim myth is a fairytale that has been perpetuated by elitist Hindu liberals. It is one of those myths which is bought wholesale by both the left and the right. But sadly like any other fairytale, it is not based on any facts. Look at the nature of political Islam from 1920 to 2016 and you will find that nowhere has it been more treacherous and lethal than in the Indian subcontinent. There are Islamic political movements in the Middle East too — there was the Baath party in Iraq, Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and various other groups — but none of them led to the treacherous partition of a nation the way it did in India. In fact, claiming that Muslims of the subcontinent are peaceful is the Hindu way to hide the shameful past of being pounded by the Muslims.
The worst assumption one could make is that Indian Muslims are different from their Pakistani counterparts. Why so? Do they follow a different book? Obviously not. Go to any foreign nation and observe — the moment a Muslim from the subcontinent sets his foot on foreign land, he immediately severs his cultural roots and gets connected to the global Islamic political movements there. Just to give a small example, there are many Change.org petitions about protecting Indian interests — how many Indian Muslims do you see participating in those? How many NRI Muslims do you see walking in rallies on the streets of the US or UK to speak in favour of India? None. The moment they go there, they immediately connect their roots with the Ummah — and subsequently you will find many Indian Muslims walking in rallies for Palestine, Lebanon and Kashmir. They whole-heartedly support anti-west, anti-Israel and anti-India (basically anti-kafir) coalitions.
The Ummah mentality of the Muslims of the subcontinent has not gone away — in fact, it has only strengthened with the onset of the internet and other communication channels. Wherever there are Muslims, there is always a problem. Don’t give more credit to someone just because they happened to be born in a certain geographical part of the world. They themselves don’t care about this geography, because they believe that international borders are artificial barriers which stop Muslims from linking to form a united Ummah. Islam is not a race — it is an ideology, and unless you are making a claim that Indian Muslims have a different Quran than other Muslims (which they obviously don’t), the peaceful Indian Muslim argument holds no water.
An ideology at whose core lies antagonism against non-believers cannot be an inclusive one, no matter how much PR spin you try to give it. A lot of those who claim Indian Muslims to be more peaceful than the rest of the world are subconsciously linking it with Sufism. Even Akbar, who was under the influence of Sufi saints, killed 6 lakh Hindus. In fact, all the Muslim rulers who committed atrocities on Hindus had Sufis in their cabinet. And still some people think that Sufism is peaceful Islam.
The very fact that Hindus aren’t allowed to claim Ram Mandir is a testimony to the fact that Indian Muslims don’t adhere to a more evolved and tolerant form of Islam claimed by many. The thought process is the same as that of the invaders. Ram Mandir issue is not a real estate dispute and cannot be looked at from that angle. It is a much deeper issue of constitutional violation of the religious rights of Hindus in an allegedly secular nation which allegedly guarantees religious freedom. Ram Janmabhoomi is to Hindus what Mecca is to Muslims — there can be no negotiation on this. The fact that we are stuck in negotiations reflects that Indian Muslims have in fact NOT given up their ideological terrorism which stems from their need to dominate and persecute Hindus wherever they can. Reconciliation is a two-way street where both parties agree to walk one step each and meet in the middle. The iconoclasm of Indian Muslims is written all over the Ayodhya issue and is impossible to ignore.
Then there is another pet theory peddled around by Islam apologists according to which economic progress will lead to less radicalization — implying by corollary that poverty leads to terrorism. This has been categorically proved to be false. A lot of people involved in Jihadi activities are upper middle class, educated people. Take a look at the Indian boys who went to fight for ISIS. They were working in MNCs with a salary of 12 lakh per annum — more than what an average Indian earns. An average ISIS fighter earns a salary of 800$ a month. If money was the motivating factor to become a terrorist, surely many poor people would have agreed to join these groups for even 80$ a month, given that 60% of the world lives in poverty. Why didn’t all those poor people join them? Because people with a sane moral compass stay away from such ideologies even in the face of abject poverty.
Osama bin Laden was a billionaire. But that did not stop him from taking to extremism. Extremism is a political ideology — an idea which transcends social and economic class barriers. Shah Rukh and Amir Khan have no shortage of money, but they still indulge in Jihadi propaganda. How much money do you think the government needs to give them to stop propagating those ideas? How much money do you think would Hafiz Saeed take so that he magically stops being a terrorist?
Money is orthogonal to the issue of terrorism — it is a facilitator but not the driving force. The problem of ideological extremism is not going to go away by just throwing money at it. It is like throwing food at a wolf and expecting him to magically start behaving like a domesticated dog. He will eat the food but still continue to remain a wolf and your life is still under threat because you haven’t solved the core problem. The core problem is that unlike other fascist ideologies like Nazism and other forms of imperialism, Islam never underwent any reform because no one ever dared to tell them that. Germans today acknowledge Nazism was evil because their history books told them about the horrors it perpetuated. Islam has never been told that the atrocities it perpetuated were wrong — so instead of undergoing reform, it continues to live in its own merry world assuming that period to be “glorious.”
So Hindus should stop patting themselves on the back and giving a peaceful certificate to sub-continental Muslims. The history of Indian Muslims is far from peaceful. Even if one forgets pre-independence riots, in the post-independence period Muslims have already shown what they are capable of by throwing out Kashmiri Pandits from the valley — which was anything but peaceful. They were able to achieve this ethnic cleansing while fighting against the might of the Indian state machinery. The only hurdle in the achievement of this goal of dar-ul-Islam in the rest of the country is the fact that Hindus still have demographic majority, which is slowly but steadily slipping away in many regions. The ethnic cleansing of minorities in Pakistan and Bangladesh should be a wake-up call for all those who comfortably prefer to ignore this demographic reality.
What is then the solution to this problem? The solution can be found — but the first step is to acknowledge that there is no such entity called “Peaceful Indian Muslim.” Once most Hindus acknowledge the existence of this problem, only then can solutions be found.
