Representative restoration image generated because no original image was embedded in the supplied HTML.
There is a fungus named Ophiocordyceps which infects Camponotus leonardi ants living in tropical rainforest trees in Thailand. Once infected, the fungus takes control of the ant’s brain and makes that ant climb down from its natural habitat, attach itself by mandibles to the underside of a leaf 25cm above the ground in an area with 94–95% humidity and temperature between 20–25°C, and die. The fungus, having done its job, starts growing hypha — and in a few days hypha emerges from the exoskeleton of the dead ant. When the fungus releases spores, it creates an infectious killing field of about 1 square metre directly below the ant’s body that infects any C. leonardi ant unfortunate enough to pass through it.
Anyone who is even mildly aware knows about the higher TFR of Muslims than other major religions across nationalities — with a black swan exception of Tanzania, and with Israeli Jews trying to consciously outperform Arabs in fertility and succeeding in 2017 for the first time. Though this book, Truth About Muslim Population Explosion in India, devotes the majority of its content towards expounding this matter using statistics, its main orientation is not towards red-pilling its readers about an issue regarding which they already have a faint idea.
The real purpose of this book is not only to provide statistical proofs about a universal intuition and projections about the future, but also to bring forth the dire situation of Hindu demographics. While people may have an intuition about the role of TFR, they may still be unaware of the interplay of other factors like average age of childbirth on population growth, female foeticide, government intervention etc. These facts have been deliberately muddled by the leftists to ensure that Dharmics act like sheep for slaughter and do not wake up until it is too late.
This book addresses all these concerns and also touches upon political problems that would arise in India due to the falling percentage of Hindu population — a prelude of which we have witnessed in Kashmir. It also busts the myth of why Muslims do not need to attain full majority before such events start to unfold before your eyes.
When combined with western SJW memes that a section of Hindus are very keen to adopt, it has ensured that not only are Hindus unaware of the direness of this situation, but are willing accomplices in their own approaching doom. While the leftist agenda of misinformation treats Hindus like mushrooms — feeds them shit and keeps them in the dark — SJW memes are like the Ophiocordyceps fungus which drives any civilization unfortunate enough to contract them to suicide. This process has been repeated many times in history and has been observed and commented upon by many people — like historian and philosopher Oswald Spengler in “The Decline of the West,” or anthropologists like Unwin in his research compilation “Sex and Culture.” If this situation persists, doom and darkness for Dharma in India is guaranteed. This book is thus a timely release to raise awareness about the impending complications for this nation.
Available at: Amazon India — Truth About Muslim Population Explosion in India
Coming to final part of this series on overpopulation, let us look back at what we have covered so far. In part 1, we addressed myths of India already having an overall high population number, and high population density. In part 2 we addressed myths of India not having enough land and water to support a large population. Now we must move on to what is perhaps one of the most contentious issues, i.e. high population causes unemployment.
Myth 5: Over Population causes unemployment
This is a very pernicious lie, perpetuated by even the supposedly RW economists. Over population has not caused unemployment per se, nor will it do so, without mismanagement of the economy by the government. For example, the unemployment rate in India was far higher in the 1980s, during era of Indira’s license raj than today.
Consider a self-sustained village of 1000 people, running near full efficiency, with enough doctors, engineers, public servants, police officers, lawyers, judges, traders, business owners, farmers, bankers and laborers. Suppose 5% are unemployed. If the population grows tenfold, the village will need roughly ten times as many people in each profession and may still retain roughly the same unemployment rate. The same model can be extrapolated to much larger populations.
Like most arguments about overpopulation of India, the argument that it is responsible for India’s backwardness is based on raw numbers. India has fewer doctors per capita than developed nations not because of overpopulation, but because India has not invested adequately in health care and is thus unable to produce enough doctors per capita.
Over population is actually more efficient for some sectors of Economy
There are sectors where the larger population will actually make the population wealthier with the same efficiency, one such is the defense sector. A larger population can support a much larger military while spending a smaller share of total national output.
This is why most people consider increased spending on defense as bad for the economy, while simultaneously claiming that increased spending of the society on healthcare or education is a good thing. There can be no better example for this phenomenon than a comparison between India and Pakistan. Per capita income level of India is only modestly higher than that of Pakistan but since India is far more populous, and hence overall economically bigger, it can spend far more on defense while devoting a smaller percentage of GDP.
This is also the reason USA is presently the sole superpower of the world. Many nations match USA in terms of per capita income and wealth. However, none have the same military might, partly because the USA’s population is several times higher than most individual European countries.
It is also the reason Japan could never have taken over as the prime super power of the world like it was feared in the 1980s. Japan only had about half the population of USA, and a number that was already in decline.
This is why it is considered inevitable that China, and eventually India, will start to out-produce the west, to become the most dominant force on the planet. Population can be a positive force for Indian society, and not a negative one. It is about time that Hindus get out of this paranoia against population, which was created by incompetent socialist governments.
Continuing with bursting the bubble on “we’re already at the brink,” this is part 2 in this series of population articles. Part 1, where we already addressed myths of India already having an overall high population number, and high population density can be found here: Over-population-is-good-for-india-and-indian-society.
Myth 3: India cannot feed its population if this population growth continues
This is a myth which has been propagated right from the time of the British, which their brown sahibs, the Indian National Congress party and its ideological cousins, the commies have projected fully onto the Indian population. India once was a country which was world renowned for manufacturing and export of fabrics & clothes, enjoying patronage from times of Greeks till even the 16th century. Such a feat was made possible because the Indian population was well fed, and had enough spare land to cultivate cotton and weave them into a variety of fabrics & clothes for exports. India subsequently under the Raj was reduced to a country of mass starvation, because of the forced cultivation of indigo, tobacco, opium etc. by the British over the food cultivation. To hide the genocide the British engineered on Indian peasants for their greed, the British blamed the over population of India and how Indian famine is due to Indian population being too high. Please take a note, even with famines resulting in millions of deaths, British didn’t stop the export of food grains out of India. Now, in place of the British, we have the mentally colonized brown sahibs from Congress and Communists, who peddle the same lies for starvation in India. They say there’s a lack of land and overpopulation instead of addressing the actual reasons – the virtual absence of social mobility for the Indian farmers, largely due to over regulation of the business sector and industrial sector.
A fair few of the well-heeled in India, who would like to invest in industries or business, they don’t even try to venture into the business world. They are to a large extent put off by the gargantuan amount of regulations, with varying complexities, all of which they have to tackle in order to become successful. In states where the Communists flex muscle, like West Bengal and Kerala, labor unions have scared most investors away with their politicking. This has reduced the population in those particular states to earn their wealth serving either other Indians, or, serving others outside India, where conditions vary from good to plain atrocious. Many of the working class, they have to contend with conditions worse than they had in India itself. Many a videos of workers whose passports are snatched away, food rationed, residing in poor living quarters can be found online to substantiate this. Despite all this, the political leadership espouses virtues of communism/ socialism, while the natives of the land are away from their homeland, with almost nonexistent rights available to them in the countries they work. Scarily enough, real trouble runs even deeper. Since most business sectors and industrial sectors are over regulated, it reduces the incentive for private companies to invest. As a consequence, many jobs which would otherwise be created, they don’t end up anywhere but the drawing board. The farmers, who as it is are not able to make their ends meet, they find themselves unable to switch to something else even if their life depended on it. To add insult to injury, they put in place laws restricting usage, essentially making it illegal to use agricultural land for any other purpose than agriculture. This means a farmer won’t be able to sell his land to a real estate developer/ industrialist, who are likely to provide far bigger compensation for the land, than would another farmer. The farmers in effect have no choice and are somewhat forced to work in farming sector, whether he is able to meet his ends from farming or not. This is why many of the farmers live in abject poverty, often propped only by welfare measures of the brown saheb regimes, whose very policies cursed them to this position in the first place. Many people have apprehension about farmland being developed into real estate, but that is to forget that not all such land was farmland to begin with. In fact, there is more farmland in India today than there was in 1947. So we can safely say protecting the present farmlands is not the only way to increase area under cultivation. The crushing pressure which is but the result of it all, leads many to take their own lives which is a matter of national shame.
An area where Indian agriculture could certainly improve is production from present area under cultivation. Small farmers in India are mostly poor, and are not in any position to adopt massive scale modern technology like tractors, harvesters, improved hybrid seed varieties, improved irrigation techniques etc. In short, most of them are somewhat stuck with their unproductive and unscientific methods of farming for life. It is worth noting that till 18th century, this was the case for all the countries in the world. However, the developed nations of the west today were able to change the system by following exactly the opposite of what the Congress & Communist ideologues have done – that is to encourage people out of agriculture into more productive fields, like services sector and industrial sector. It is worth noting, that none of the industrialized and developed countries of the west presently have agriculture employing more than 5% of the population. The percentage of population employed in agriculture is about 8% for Japan, 5% for USA, 2% for UK, 3% for France etc. Since in those countries, farmers own large quantities of land, they can afford to adopt newer more productive technologies into agriculture easier and faster and lead their lives comfortably from farming, simply through economies of scale. For example, if there are two farmers, A and B, with A having 20 acres of land and B having 1 acre of land for farming. Even if A only gets Rs.500 per month per acre as opposed to B’s Rs.1000 per month per acre, A will get a net income of Rs.10,000 per month from his 20 acre land as opposed to B’s income of Rs.1000 per month from 1 acre land. Not easy to comprehend that A will be living a good life style, and B will be living a poverty stricken one. The latter is the story of majority of the Indian farmers today.
So why is it all relevant to the discussion of overpopulation in India? Contrary to popular belief, India actually has a lot more land per capita for farming, much higher quality of land for farming. Indian lands can be farmed all through the year, unlike the western farms which can only be farmed during summer, thanks to excellent Indian climate. For example, Japan, South Korea, UK, Italy, France, Belgium etc. all have lower per capita farmland than India. Even China has a lower per capita farmland than India, but many people mistakenly believe that china has more farmland due to its size. But majority of China’s land is deserts like Tibetan plateau and Gobi desert and jungles. Believe it or not, Indian per capita farmland is 50% more than that of China’s per capita farmland. India actually has a far higher area under cultivation than China. However, Indian agricultural outputs are actually lower than that of China, even though Chinese agricultural outputs are nowhere near as high as most western countries or Japanese agricultural output. Based on all this, one can conclusively say that the problem of Indian agriculture is using outdated techniques for cultivation, irrigation etc. and not a problem of lack of arable land. a1 Info taken from FAO. Indian wheat yields lowest in the world.
Today, India is food secure, unlike the India of 1947. This idea of population not being fed properly comes from now discredited idea of Malthusian view of population and economics, which postulated that population growth cannot be matched by food production, which erroneously matched population growth model of future with the agricultural output and techniques available then, that is the 18th century. If India can get rid of pathological legislations and labor laws and licenses, the output of Indian farms can more than quadruple. “Too good to be true”, you say? Consider that average Indian yield per hectare for most food crops is only 1/4th that of the developed countries, so this is but easily achievable. Even with present day technology, India can sustain a population 3 times higher, let alone what the future technologies can bring to agriculture. Think about it, with GMOs, & other research presently underway, the production can only improve. All in all, the statement that India cannot support a high population is a myth, which is not grounded in fact or logic, but is propaganda propounded by Congress & Communist ideologues who gave rise to many problems we face today. You can find the per capita Arable land figure for India here: http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Agriculture/Arable-land/Hectares-per-capita#amount. Note that India has the 109th position in the ranking when it comes to low land per hectare, meaning there are 108 countries in the list which have lower per capita land than India. Also to be noted is that the per capita arable land for India is 0.129 which is the same as that of the 20 times richer Western Europe, which nobody in their right mind calls over populated.
Myth 4: India is water starved and Indian population can’t sustain itself due to lack of water
Here is the list of countries of the world and their “Renewable” water availability per capita: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ER.H2O.INTR.PC?year_high_desc=false. In this list, we can see Israel (whose per capita renewable water availability is 4 times lower than that of India), Egypt, Hungary, Denmark, Belgium ( EU headquarters which wants more population to sustain its demography) are some of the countries which have poorer water availability than India. While countries like Germany, South Korea, Czech Republic etc. have similar per capita water level of India, and yet nobody thinks of these countries as water starved. The water problem in India is not because of the lack of water sources, but rather lack of proper management of existing water sources. This needs proper management of our resources and not reduction of our population. Also, do note that water availability for most of the population of India as a percentage of population, it has actually increased in the recent years than decrease with increase in population. This increase is a direct result of better management of the available water resources. This is not even taking into account the massive potential saltwater desalination plants have in water management. In fact, Israel, which has only 1/4th the Water availability of India, has a TFR of 3 as opposed to Indian TFR of 2.3 which is already below natural replacement rate for many of the regions.
For all the useless platitudes which are passed around, a result of perverse sense of enemy of my enemy mentality, Hindu RW sure doesn’t want to learn anything useful for their survival from Israel. The Israeli TFR is maintained high at the encouragement of their state, and their population has a good demographic base for their survival against their surrounding enemies. In face of this, Hindu RW is pretty happy adopting liberal memes which will kill them demographically, a slow, but inevitable death. The self-appointed Hindu thekedars, i.e. BJP/ RSS, presently in power in Assam for instance, is planning to pass a law forbidding people having more than 2 children from holding government offices (also MP). Since a large part of bureaucracy is formed by Hindus, is it a step in right direction? Compare that with the way Israeli government (which is supposedly secularist if one believes the right wing nutters of western media) encourages its Jewish citizens to have more children. In the next and final part of this series, we will take a look at one of the biggest myths thrown in our face, myth that unemployment will increase with rise in population numbers.
Contextual editorial illustration for the restored article.
We hear so much propaganda from government and media that India is over populated. But is it really overpopulated? A country being overpopulated or not — and its degree of overpopulation — can be measured by seeing its physiological population density.
What is Physiological Density of population?
Definition
The physiological density or real population density is the number of people per unit area of arable land. A higher physiological density suggests that the available agricultural land is being used by more people and may reach its output limit sooner than a country that has a lower physiological density.
So the countries in the list which have a worse physiological density than India but have a better standard of living (excluding oil-exporting countries) are:
Singapore (this can be excluded as a small trade-oriented country)
Iceland – 4,229/sq.km of arable land
South Korea – 2,998/sq.km of arable land
Taiwan – 2,932/sq.km of arable land
Japan – 2,924/sq.km of arable land
Netherlands – 2,205/sq.km of arable land
Israel – 2,147/sq.km of arable land
Colombia – 2,064/sq.km of arable land
Switzerland – 1,900/sq.km of arable land
Costa Rica – 1,803/sq.km of arable land
Malaysia – 1,336/sq.km of arable land
Belgium – 1,248/sq.km of arable land
Slovenia – 1,170/sq.km of arable land
United Kingdom – 1,077/sq.km of arable land
China – 943/sq.km of arable land
Liechtenstein – 843/sq.km of arable land
Luxembourg – ~750/sq.km of arable land
Italy – ~750/sq.km of arable land
Note: Oil exporters like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and Venezuela are excluded to avoid the confounding variable of oil wealth. Countries only marginally better than India like Indonesia and Sri Lanka (which is better than India despite fighting a civil war) are also not included.
So is it right to blame our under-development on our population when clearly, countries much more overpopulated than us have succeeded much better economically and socially?
All our ills are caused by the misgovernance of five decades of Congress rule and their misplaced socialistic economic policies. Population was just a bogey to hide the incompetence of the Nehru clan and its bad socialist policies. To be frank, we would have remained underdeveloped even if we had only a population of 2 crore instead of the present 125 crore — while we can thrive even with 300 crore population if we utilise our potential to the maximum through capitalism, just like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Belgium and others with similar population density are thriving. It is about time we stopped blaming population for our ills and looked at our economic policies — which was the actual reason we are poor.
Originally published January 10, 2016 on Yuga Parivartan. Source: List of countries by real population density based on food growing capacity — Wikipedia.
