My blog

Tag: Pro-Hindu

  • How India can get a pro-Hindu party

    How India can get a pro-Hindu party

    This is the fourth and final article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.

    The previous article clearly articulated that BJP is not a pro-Hindu party or a proper nationalist party, so now the question arises: how can Hindus get a proper Hindu party? One method which we earlier suggested was to vote out BJP in local elections like municipalities, corporations and panchayats as a punishment for deviating from its pro-Hindu status and pro-nationalist stance, while voting it in to give it one more chance to perform at the national and state levels. Instead, pro-Hindu independent candidates can be voted in within their respective constituencies. This is one way to generate feedback to BJP and dissuade it from deviating from a pro-Hindu agenda.

    The next, more important step is to infiltrate parties with pro-Hindu leaders at various levels by preferentially voting for them where possible.

    Thirdly, if BJP does not serve as a proper pro-Hindu, pro-nationalist party, and if Hindus make it clear that any new party which is pro-Hindu has huge prospects in India, a new political party will emerge from the vacuum, much like BJP emerged from the vacuum in the 1980s, from a party of two MPs to a party with a single-party majority today. Such a hardline Hindu stance can be conveyed by voting in staunch Hindus like Yogi Adityanath, Kalyan Singh, Sakshi Maharaj and Uma Bharati, giving them massive electoral victories by consolidating behind them.

    Finally, the worst thing Hindus can do is keep voting for BJP without any change in their voting pattern or any tactical thought behind it, even though that is precisely what BJP fanboys want them to do. BJP fanboys claim that since BJP is the least-worst option, it should not be criticized or punished by Hindus when it engages in jumlas for votes without doing anything for Hindus. What is the point of having BJP in power if it won’t do anything good for Hindus anyway? Careful analysis of BJP fanboy rhetoric will show how pathetic their position is. They seem inclined to believe that constant whining and bellyaching by fanboys and Hindus on social media like Facebook and Twitter will solve the problem of BJP not doing anything for Hindus. This is absurd considering that BJP is a political party like any other and will not care about what its fanboys think so long as it can get their votes. It has even made clear on multiple occasions that BJP’s top leadership thinks its fanboys are a nuisance for the BJP and its inclusive agenda.

    Also, BJP and its fanboys are probably the only people in the whole world, besides communists, who ask what their supporters did for them, as if supporters owe them anything. Natural logic goes the other way, as political parties exist to cater to the needs of their voters. Hence any logical and neutral person can clearly see that BJP fanboy logic — whining and bellyaching on social media but voting for BJP anyway — will not yield any results, as BJP is more than happy to keep the pot boiling at just the right temperature to stay in power without actually fixing any problems.

    Ironically enough, sometimes the same BJP fanboys go to extreme lengths to defend BJP’s position by claiming that it is a truly secular party and hence should not do anything for Hindus, even though they jump everywhere to silence people who ask for a new right-wing Hindu party to emerge. This only begs the question: why do they even bother to speak against the call for a true Hindu party or an alternative to BJP which they claim is a truly secular and not pro-Hindu party? The cognitive dissonance of these fanboys can be judged from their circular logic:

    1. BJP is not perfect.
    2. But there is no alternative to BJP.
    3. Therefore assume that BJP is perfect.
    4. Since BJP is now assumed to be perfect, we cannot criticize it.
    5. But since BJP cannot be criticized, there will never be an alternative.
    6. Given there will be no alternative, BJP is the only option, which takes us back to point 2.

    Even hardcore Hindus think that a Hindu voting bloc will fall like manna from heaven or BJP will suddenly start implementing the Hindu agenda. But the fact is that until Hindus learn to punish anyone who tramples on their traditions, no party will ever turn pro-Hindu. The day they start punishing anti-Hindu agendas, every party will turn pro-Hindu. But to achieve that they need to put Hindu priorities above party or organization. How will it work?

    1. Voters go vocal on pro-Hindu issues.
    2. Congress and all others see it and turn a bit right on Hindu issues.
    3. Given this opportunity, a new vocal far-Hindu-right party will emerge.
    4. Looking at all this change, BJP will turn even more right.
    5. End result: the entire political spectrum in India will shift pro-Hindu.

    India will then become something like the West, which is secular but still proudly proclaims its Judeo-Christian roots. But if you keep giving breathing space to every BJP politician when they backtrack on their promises, then it won’t happen. Just look again at the cognitive-dissonance algorithm of fanboys above to understand why. Shivraj needs to pay for his Bhojshala rollback; the same goes for Fat-Novice on the Shani temple fiasco.

    It would be better if Hindus learn something from Jews instead of fawning over them with irrational love, so that the Hindu agenda is obeyed no matter who is in power. Such a transition in politics would require actual work on the ground, which would send a message to BJP and other political parties that pro-Hindu policies and parties have huge potential to achieve power in India. The least destructive way to achieve it is by voting out BJP in local elections while explaining why they wouldn’t vote for sell-outs and brown-skinned Americans with Hindu pretensions. If Hindus start to build a consensus together now, either BJP will turn into a real pro-Hindu party or an alternative pro-Hindu party will arise within a decade, much like how pro-Modi consensus was formed within two years after 2012.

    Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 of this series.

  • Why BJP is not a pro-Hindu party

    Why BJP is not a pro-Hindu party

    This is the third article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1, Part 2 and Part 4.

    Anyone who follows the realpolitik of the USA would observe that Republicans and their religious right are pro-Israel to the hilt. For instance, the Iraq war was orchestrated by Republican president Bush to help get rid of Israel’s local threat, Saddam’s Iraq. Does that mean that the left in the USA is anti-Jew or anti-Israel? In most communities or groups, when the right wing is pro-something, is the left wing usually anti the same thing? Of course not. The Democrats are equally fanatical supporters of Zionism and Israel, and Democrats under Obama and Hillary destabilized the entire Middle East from Libya to Syria for protecting the interests of Israel, often wasting the overall geopolitical influence, power and wealth of the USA. Jews usually have massive influence over the countries they live in, often disproportionate to their numbers, which forms an interesting case study in simple realpolitik. How Jews get their agenda implemented in the USA should be a case study for all aspiring Hindus.

    Hindu nationalists often have an irrational love for Israel and huge admiration for Jews and their resilience. But have they learnt anything from them for implementing their own agenda? No. For instance, compare how Jews try to play both sides of the political spectrum by influencing both Democrats and Republicans in elections, so that no matter who comes to power, both serve the interests of Israel and Jews. Comparatively, Hindu nationalists still can’t seem to make up their minds whether their loyalty is to the ideology and Hindu cause or the supposedly Hindu party called BJP.

    If Hindus have to win this ideological war against the Abrahamics and their numerous cousins — Marxists, feminists, liberals, seculars, etc. — they need to learn these games from the Jews they admire rather than chanting pro-Israel slogans without caring for Indian national interests. Thus, the first step is to determine whether their loyalty lies with any organization or with their ideology. Blind loyalty to a party or organization will only lead to the betterment of the party and not their ideology, and vice versa. So even if BJP portrays itself as a pro-Hindu party, it is much better to have an alternative as well in case BJP fails to deliver on its promises to Hindus or meet the expectations of its core Hindu voters. The objective should be to force all parties towards accepting a Hindu core agenda, such that they get punished for violating a certain threshold or Lakshman Rekha.

    To achieve this objective one first needs to make up one’s mind and analyse whether BJP is actually a pro-Hindu party or whether it is just a bubble created by media to keep Hindus bogged down and never let them realize what a pro-Hindu party should look like. To do this study, one needs to look at recent events and assess whether BJP passes the smell test of being a pro-Hindu party:

    1. Shani temple issue, where Dev Fadnavis, a brown American with Hindu pretensions, decided to desecrate Hindu traditions just to appease an anti-Hindu feminist, even though the majority of common Hindus in Maharashtra, and indeed the whole of India, are against the idea, except perhaps his equally deracinated brown-American brothers stuck in Hindu India.
    1. Bhojshala temple, where the BJP government of Madhya Pradesh sold out Hindus and their temple to Mullahs.
    1. Right to Education Act, which is a special case of BJP not backstabbing Hindus but being outright anti-Hindu, where BJP actively supported getting it passed and till now hasn’t taken any interest in fixing it. In fact, the brown American with an Indian passport, Devendra Fadnavis, is actively implementing the RTE Act with zealotry in Maharashtra, causing the closure of several thousand Hindu schools, while his daughter gets educated in a Christian convent which is outside the ambit of the RTE Act.
    1. NIT students were backstabbed by BJP for staying in power in Kashmir. While apologists claim that BJP is doing good by staying in power, any neutral observer should ask what good such power is in the hands of BJP if their ground supporters are going to be screwed by Islamists and anti-nationals anyway.
    1. Not showing any interest in fixing academia in India, which is the fountainhead of Hinduphobic discourse, sowing seeds for sectarianism, often spewing venom against Hindus and justifying Islamic savagery in medieval India while simultaneously downplaying facts like the destruction of thousands of temples as fiction of Hindutva imagination, even though the Islamic barbarians themselves wrote books praising and extolling their rulers for destroying these temples and killing millions of innocent Hindus.

    To make matters worse, the esteemed HRD minister Smriti Irani is more concerned about veg and non-veg food being served in Indian colleges than fixing the rot in today’s academia — going after useless brainwashed idiots like Kanhaiya rather than the academic snakes and ringmasters who brainwash newer generations of students through anti-national propaganda in institutes like JNU. Smriti Irani even gets applause from BJP fanboys when she proudly proclaims how she hasn’t changed a single book, academician, course or syllabus since she became HRD minister, to bolster her neutral credentials. The fact is that fixing academia is something which doesn’t need Rajya Sabha backing or a majority, but just political will.

    1. The decision to induct women into combat forces, with Home Minister Rajnath saying that they will give 33% reservation for women in CRPF and open frontline combat roles for women in the Army. Should we not learn from the Ambur Muslim riots in Tamil Nadu, where many policewomen were molested and harassed? And this is an incident which happened inside India where Hindus are the majority. You can easily imagine the horror of sending Hindu women into combat against the Pakistani army, which is ISIS except in name. It’s not that they will refrain from rape or torture or treat them like saints, given the way they behaved in Bangladesh. BJP is once again more interested in being brown Americans with Hindu names, just like their fanboys who support this initiative against common sense merely to satisfy an imported ideology of absolute gender equality without understanding India’s security environment. Of course, women have a place in police and that should be limited to women police dealing with women in riots or brown-skinned American degenerates like Trupti Desai when they try to turn India into a brown-skinned version of the Western cesspool, but not fighting against Pakistani barbarians outside and inside India.
    1. Multiple flip-flops on Pakistani diplomacy — from “terror and dialogue cannot go hand in hand” as promised in the election manifesto, to currently following the clone policy of Congress, i.e. uninterrupted and uninterruptible dialogue no matter how many terrorist attacks happen inside India. BJP fanboys now shamelessly defend it by invoking the fallacy of authority, while they derided Congress as anti-national for doing the same thing.

    So it can be established fairly certainly that BJP is not a pro-Hindu party or an actual Indian nationalist party with any sort of common sense beyond what its white masters deem fit to be progressive and appropriate. If you have any doubt, read this to understand what should be the demands to classify any party pro-Hindu. It is only the media which has built this image for BJP over a long period of time. At best BJP can be claimed to be a less anti-Hindu and less anti-national party than the Communist-Congress cabal. This is one reason BJP can be given some slack for now and should still be voted into power in state and national elections with a thumping majority if possible, because voting for other parties, especially the Communists, Congress cabal or its numerous clones like AAP, BSP, JDU and DMK, in such crucial elections is akin to Hindus committing harakiri.

  • How media sells secular demands as pro-Hindu

    How media sells secular demands as pro-Hindu

    This is the second article in this series on explaining the problems with emergence of a real Hindu party. Read Part 1 and Part 3.

    The media and intellectual environment has been so anti-Hindu in India that most issues which pass off as pro-Hindu issues hardly pass the smell test when looked at carefully. Given this hostile environment, it is no surprise that entire generations of Hindus have been brainwashed and converted into such meek cows that they have lost the mental faculty to challenge and question the narrative which goes around as pro-Hindu.

    The benchmark criterion to decide whether a policy is pro-Hindu or not is to look at it and ask the question: are Hindus the only beneficiaries of this policy? If a policy helps all Indians then it cannot be pro-Hindu, so call it a nationalistic policy. Similarly, all policies which bring Hindus to a level playing field with other religions are again not pro-Hindu as they only correct historical bias against them, so call them secular. Using this criterion we can now look at some long-standing issues to understand whether they are pro-Hindu issues or not.

    1. Uniform Civil Code: It does not help Hindus explicitly in any way. Hindu civil law is almost modern and Hindus will hardly gain anything if Muslims cannot divorce their wives through triple talaq or have four wives. It is a secular issue and if India really is a secular country, as the libtards claim, then they should support implementation of UCC. Implementation of UCC will not really help Hindus but it will definitely bolster the secular image of India by dismantling religion-specific civil laws.
    1. Article 370: J&K as a region is important for national security given that it can connect India to Central Asian republics and also provides a connection between India’s two big rivals, China and Pakistan. It is in India’s interest to integrate J&K completely into the country and wrest back PoK. So again, repealing Article 370 does not help Hindus alone and is an issue of national importance. Any person opposing it is helping Pakistan and China against India and weakening India’s security environment.
    1. Right to Education Act: Hindu institutions are taxed under this law while minority institutes have no obligation to give quotas to SC/STs or follow the stringent requirements of this law. Minority institutions are thriving thanks to this law while thousands of Hindu schools have closed down. So again, repealing this law will put Hindus on par with other minorities. It is therefore a secular issue and not pro-Hindu in any way. In any other country with a basic framework of law, this discriminatory tax on schools operated by the majority would have been quashed by the courts on first hearing. It was in fact quashed by the courts before Congress brought in the 93rd Amendment to strangle and kill Hindu schools.
    1. Temple Control: Money from Hindu temples is siphoned off and used by greedy governments while they pay Hajj subsidies to Muslims. Churches and mosques are free to receive all donations they can and use their own funds in whichever way they deem important. Hindu organizations, on the other hand, are helpless against this state intervention and watch meekly while government takes away their donations. So freeing temples and putting them on par with other religious institutions is not a pro-Hindu but a secular agenda, requiring the state not to rob money from temples and hand it out as Hajj subsidy.
    1. Jallikattu ban: This is an assault on local traditions while minorities are allowed to mutilate small children under freedom of religion. A secular state has no mandate to dictate how religious festivals should be organized. Freedom to practise one’s religion and celebrate festivals in ways one deems important is not a place for government intervention, which again makes it a secular issue. If Muslims can slay thousands of meek goats on Bakrid, it reeks of hypocrisy when courts challenge healthy Jallikattu bulls under the pretext of animal rights.

    Some of the above-mentioned issues have been paraded around as pro-Hindu issues, but a careful look demolishes the whole narrative. Most gospel truths about pro-Hindu policies are taken at face value by gullible Hindus, while actually they hardly help Hindus in any way. It is like asking a runner to start 20 metres behind everyone else in a 100-metre race. When this runner demands to start at the same position as everyone else, the thekedars in the racing fraternity rule against him, citing that they cannot put him on par with other runners as it gives him an undue advantage, completely ignoring the initial bias.

    Given the above-mentioned policies don’t explicitly help Hindus, what can be classified as pro-Hindu policies?

    1. Ram Temple: This is a long-standing issue and important for collective Hindu consciousness given the importance of Lord Ram in Hindu history. Hindus are the rightful owners of the land in Ayodhya. One random mosque hardly counts for Muslims and they don’t think twice before demolishing one in the Islamic nation of Saudi Arabia. It is Muslim iconoclasm which stands in the way of showing a big heart and allowing Hindus to build the temple of one of the most important Hindu icons at his birthplace. In case government decides to solve this issue in favour of the Hindu temple using its legislative powers, then it can be classified as a pro-Hindu issue. However, current litigation in the Supreme Court just makes it another property dispute rather than a pro-Hindu issue.
    1. Ban on proselytization by non-Hindus: A policy which disallows missionaries from converting the local population would fall under this category. Banning conversions for all religions does not make it pro-Hindu. Only a policy which bans conversion out of Hinduism while allowing Ghar Wapsi can be called pro-Hindu. Under the current Constitution, covert policies can be implemented to stop missionaries. For example, in tribal belts under the garb of protecting local culture, missionaries can be denied entry into the whole region while allowing Hindus to target Christian converts. This is not explicitly pro-Hindu but covertly achieves the same agenda.
    1. Birth-control restrictions on Muslims: To maintain demographic superiority of Hindus, it is very important to reduce the current boom in Muslim population. Any policy which explicitly or implicitly reduces Muslim births while having no impact on Hindus can be called pro-Hindu.
    1. Force minority institutes to implement reservations: Reservation benefits are restricted to Hindus in most cases, so if minority institutes are forced to educate SC/STs, it will increase opportunities for Hindus while reducing them for minorities. If a 50% quota can be implemented in minority institutes, it can be called a pro-Hindu policy as it will educate Hindu masses while minorities foot the bill. This is not a big tax given minority institutes will still get a chance to preserve their culture, but at a small cost of educating backward Hindus.
    1. Throw out illegal Muslim immigrants from Bangladesh and give citizenship to minority Hindus from Bangladesh and Pakistan.

    The above examples clearly show that many other similar policies can be designed with explicit benefit for Hindus. But it is essential for Hindus to push back on unnecessary tags awarded to policies which do not pass the pro-Hindu criterion. Policies that do not exclusively help Hindus need to be declassified and placed under secular or national policy headings. Implementation of pro-Hindu policies will only be feasible after Hindus dismantle the narrative and repeal anti-Hindu policies. But the first step is to stop classifying secular policies under the pro-Hindu basket. This brings us to the million-dollar question: is there any political party which can really claim to be pro-Hindu?

    Read Part 1 and Part 3 of this series.