Tag: Rape

USA should change its name to United States of Barbaria
From Game of Thrones to McDonalds, there is unhealthy liking for the American culture among Indians and for all the wrong reasons. American culture, as they like to call it themselves is actually not a culture at all. Truth is that they are a bunch of barbarians with no history of their own and have to borrow their history from other barbarians like Anglo-Saxons, who themselves were barbarians and got civilised by Rome and now delude themselves as descendants of Rome, because without it their history before 500AD is that of barbarity, loot and rape unlike India which has had a long and continuous history of 5000 years at least, dating back to the Indus Valley Civilisation. History aside, even now there is no American culture or civilisation. Look at the points below and judge for yourself if you would like to call it a culture:
1. The average bastard rate in USB – 40%
2. The percentage of single mothers and divorce rates in USB – 50%
3. US actually has one of the highest rape rates in the world– it has four times higher number of rapes than India despite having four times lower population.
4. Land of prisoners- highest incarceration rate in the world while India has the lowest and also lowest crime figures.
5. Average obesity levels of 33% i.e. unhealthy general population
Given the above statistics, it becomes difficult to define American culture. Is it the culture of highest rapes in the world? Or is it the highest obesity rate in the world? Or is it great due to the highest number of single mothers in the world or by the highest number of bastards in the world? Or due to the highest number of prisoners in the world?

But don’t fault an average American for all this. Being an Anglo-Saxon barbarian, as opposed to being a descendant of living civilisation like India, their society was expected to be barbarian. Faulting them for being barbaric uncultured bastards with highest rapes in the world is like faulting an animal for being an animal. Does someone fault a rabid dog for biting? Is a dog conscious of being a rabid dog? Of course not. It is just its nature and illness. But as civilized human beings, one should keep clear of a rabid dog.

Being born without a history or father or culture or anything other than money like the USB, is not in their hands. Hence mocking them is wrong and bad. Indians should keep it in mind whenever they think if America’s bastard rate, single mothers, rape crisis or lack of actual history or civilisation. Also, do remember that nobody chastises a pig for eating shit and hence one should not castigate the Americans for the ills afflicting their society. But on the other hand, Indians should think several times before they try to emulate the society of bastards and their glorious culture with haste.

The funniest thing about Americans is this- being a history less bastard descendants of Anglo-Saxon barbarians, the ingenious way they try to have a history is by claiming to be western “civilization”, i.e. descendants of Rome and Greece, even though neither had anything to do with Anglo-Saxon barbarians as per real history. To demonstrate how pathetic this claim is, just to give an analogy, imagine a person claiming that his neighbour is his father/dad just because his own father is poor or absent. That is how the Americans claim to be descendants of Rome/Greece is, as they claim that they are the western civilization and culture since they themselves don’t have any culture or history of their own, except that of killing, slavery, loot and plunder. For Indians, this paragraph would probably appear to be the most insulting to Americans in the whole post. But one has to doubt if an average American Joe would understand the gravity of insult in this paragraph as being a bastard and claiming other men as their own fathers because of their own illegitimacy, is probably not a big deal in USB i.e. the country of bastards. So it might be that this insult might fly right past and unnoticed by an average American.

To hide their insecurities and rotten society, this wannabe civilisation and culture resorts to blaming Indians and highlight non-issues while hiding their own problems. The hypocrisy of American stance in most of these cases is like of those parents of a failed high school kid, who chastise their neighbours on low marks of their kid in post graduate course to hide failure of their own offspring. Any sane person would suggest such parents to focus on their own failed high school kid rather than make an issue out of the neighbour’s kid.

Indians are a living civilization with glorious past and self correction over time. It is the biggest insult to take advice from such barbarians, who not only don’t have any culture but also don’t have any religion of their own. For all their barbarity, Arabs can at least claim to have their own culture and religion while most Americans worship a dead middle-eastern Jew from Asia while at the same time trying to be a cheap knock off of the Roman empire and ancient Greece. For instance, when Americans talk about caste system in India, they completely forget that they are a society which had legalized slavery till 19th century. On top, it is the only country in the world which had to fight a civil war to abolish this inhuman practice of slavery and still did not give full civil rights to blacks till 1970s, almost 100 years after fighting the civil war for freeing black. Now imagine the gall of the same uncivilized people lecturing the world on human rights when they themselves suppressed the rights of their own population till a few decades ago.

But as argued before, it is not their fault that they don’t realize how pathetic their society is. After all a dog does not know that its wrong to bark at the sun nor does a pig know that eating crap is unhygienic. So living like animals like the Americans do now is also not their fault, its just what a culture epitomized by current Hollywood of drugs, single mothers, bastards, illegitimate claims of being descendants of a civilization or illegitimate claims of having a culture in the first place will look like. So Indians should not be insensitive to them and mock them for what they are. It is just in their genes. But Indians can still debate on how to call USB- United State of Barbaria or United States of Bastards?
August 11, 2016
How Indian media protects its rapists

Representative restoration image generated because no original image was embedded in the supplied HTML.

The job of the media around the world is to report truth and promote awareness against malpractices and injustices so as to grow the society as a whole. But Indian media is filled with the vilest scum on the planet and they try to deflect issues of rape and sexual harassment done by their fellow presstitute cronies.

Look at the tweet of Sagarika Ghose, the queen bimbo of Indian journalism, on what she thinks about her fellow media presstitute Tejpal being involved in rape and sexual harassment:

[Sagarika Ghose tweet suggesting Tejpal should not be targeted for rape and sexual assault because many more such incidents happen in the world]

— Sagarika Ghose (@sagarikaghose)

She thinks that Tejpal should not be targeted for his rape and sexual assault against women just because there are many more happening in the world. How do these people justify such a stance? Should every rape allegation be downplayed and women be allowed to be raped just because it happens everywhere? Is this what these presstitutes think is empowering and protecting women? It is through instances like these when normal patriotic Indians get to know about the true nature of these parasites in India. Their outrage against rape and assaults against women is not for protecting women of India but rather to promote self-hatred among Indians.

Anyone who has seen the massive propaganda against India and Indian society for the past three years would have seen massive debates on rape culture in Indian society and how it is Indian men who are the vilest in the world — all thanks to the coolies of Christian missionaries in media. They paint a picture of how Indians are all rapists and that Indian culture is inherently evil and misogynist, even though this is completely contrary to the data at hand which shows that India is one of the safest countries for women in the world with respect to rape, with one of the lowest rapes per capita in the world. They do this to promote Indophobia — self-hatred among Indians — so that they will feel ashamed of themselves and their own culture. Once they feel ashamed enough, anything from misleading conversions to sprouting of civil war in India by the likes of John Dayal with his foreign funds can be justified.

The shallowness of Indian media on selective coverage can be seen by their complete silence when a convicted paedophile bishop was reinstated by the Church as a bishop in South India, while it was massively reported even in the western media.

So long as Indian society is under the influence of these coolies of anti-India Christian missionaries and vile rapists, even 1000s of Narendra Modis can’t save India.

June 22, 2016
Feminism in India will not help the girl child- Part II

The last article in this series talked about low sex ratio and dowry. Now, lets look at some other common salvo fired by feminists to support their presence in India.

Poor literacy among women

This problem is very similar in its origin to poor sex ratio- that is women are privileged that they are not required to work and provide for their families or the families of their in laws. A man in India, if he is married, is expected to find work and break his back to provide for his parents as well as his wife and children. The society actively chastises men who are dead beat and can’t earn a proper living for themselves and live either on their parent’s or their wives’ money. But this is not the case for women in India. Women in India have the privilege to either go to work and earn for their families or stay home and raise their children. No one can force them to work and if it is done, the society see the husband as evil while if the genders are reversed, and the wife forces her husband to work, then the society sees it as right and just. This is the reality of Indian society and there is no point getting around it and mincing words will not change this truth. This privilege women have in not being expected to work is also the reason why the female literacy rate in India is lower than male literacy.

Consider a poor family, who barely manage subsistence level lifestyle and have one boy and one girl child. Suppose that the family is poor and can afford to send only one of the kids to school(of any kind). What will make logical sense for that poor family to do? Sending their boy to college/school or their daughter? As far as the poor family is concerned, their son, if educated will have to work his back off to provide for both of them as well as earn enough to marry his sister away into a good family. But if they educate their daughter, not only does she will leave them and go live with her husband and his family, she is also under no obligation whatsoever to work for the family(be it the husband or the parent, since if the husband makes her work, he can be arrested for torture under Indian law).

Also, given the way majority women and their families usually select their husbands, it is harder for a poor family to find her a suitable husband because the educated woman and her family usually will not like marrying a sub par husband who is uneducated. This is another conscious decision on the side of the girl’s family to prefer to educate their son over their daughter. Logically too, this also makes the most sense. One can mince words from their ivory towers on why this is wrong or patriarchy or whatever, but this is the ground reality for most poor and lower middle class parents. Hence the notion that women are not educated because of misogyny is pathetic. If anything, the fact that women are given so many privileges including the privilege of not being mandated to work is the reason why many poor parents don’t send their girls to education compared to their sons, who are mandated to take care of their sisters and parents. And no, only lunatic feminists can claim that not being “mandated” to work is misogyny or oppression. Conventional or normal logic is that men working their backs off to provide for their women and children is not oppressing the women who live off their husbands work, taking care of their children. In the end, both husband and wife themselves have to decide what is best for their families on whether if wife raising kids from home is better or if both working to earn more money for their kids, albeit leaving the kids to rot alone without any guidance is better . Of course, the husband and wife can decide to both work and let their grand parents take care of their children. It will be a win win situation for everyone, but it is a topic for different day.

So, one can clearly see that this gap in education between women and men in India is because of poverty and other social realities including the fact that women are assigned no responsibilities whatsoever to take care of their parents, for the most part, and not because of misogyny as the feminist lunatics claim. Also, for fixing this problem, one has to fix the root of the problem which is poverty. Of course, when parents are wealthy, they obviously are going to send both of their children for studies and so fixing poverty would help solve most of the problems. The second step is to assign responsibility for women to take care of their parents in the society so that parents don’t feel that educating girl child is a wastage of resources for them, specially when they barely scrape by daily. This of course is not going to be accomplished by upper and middle class entitled feminist princesses who whine about patriarchy on internet everyday and use nonsensical terms like mansplaining, oppression, victimhood etc. Ever wondered why none of the poor women take these professional victims seriously even though all these feminist lunatics claim to fight for them? When was the last time you saw a poor girl holding placards shouting down with patriarchy in the streets? And seriously, is whining and bitching about patriarchy going to solve the poverty problem in India or are feminists ever going to increase responsibilities for women in India seeing as they themselves are after more power over men and society and are not really interested in taking responsibilities? Also generally the poor women hardly complain about not being able to work because they usually have to work to support their family unlike the middle class women who have the choice to not work and still claim victimhood on behalf of their poor sisters who don’t have this option.

It is also worth noting that as the Indian society will become richer, the emphasis on girl’s education will also go up naturally as a by product of prosperity. Why? Because more and more household works will get automated due to inventions like mixer-grinders, fridge, washing machine etc and hence many families will come to realise that a working wife is better for the collective good of the family than the husband working alone. This change can already be seen in states like Tamil Nadu, Maharastra Gujarat etc, where groom’s prefer working wives more than the ones which will be housemakers. As the success of two income households starts to show in comparison with the single income households, the neighbouring single income households will start to pick this idea up and become increasingly demanding for working and educated brides. This of course will have a huge impact on poor ignorant families in India because educating their daughters will then help them in getting married to a better groom in this changed societal reality. This can already be inferred from the increasing enrolment of women in the colleges in richer states.

This again demonstrates that society evolves because of natural social realities and economic progress and not because of feminist hysteria. One can objectively compare which would have made more impact on the rising levels of education among girls- changed social reality that working husband and working wife ensure better outcomes for family life or because of feminist hysteria against patriarchy? A poor family which understands the reality that two income households are much better at dealing with economic problems will be much more inclined and convinced to invest in education of their girl child rather than believing the virtual reality of angry feminist lunatics posturing in the media and academia.

Malnutrition

Malnutrition in girl children is another bogus argument the feminist love to bring up in a debate on why their man hating family destroying cancerous cult needs to exist in India. Although there is some gap in nutrition outcomes of girls and boys but malnutrition is not specifically a girl child problem but rather an Indian child problem. It is a cruel joke to insinuate that Indian girls are malnourished because of misogyny when 50% of all kids in India are malnourished and India does poorly on every social indicator for all children irrespective of their sex. The malnutrition problem in India is not because of misogyny but rather because of poverty. It is interesting to note that while the feminists harp about how misogynistic Indian society is, women in India live on average 6 years longer than men. What kind of misogynistic society is India where its women outlive men by 6 years? This is another example of how facts are manipulated to suit the feminist agenda and narrative. This narrative is really damaging because it takes focus away from important problem of poverty and low nutrition outcomes among Indian kids.

Rapes

Well this point is the worst among all the arguments presented for defence of feminism in India. Firstly, there is hardly anyone in India who supports rape. It is considered one of the worst crimes and the big crowd which emerged to protest in the aftermath of Nirbhaya case should settle the doubt in anyone’s mind on where the average Indian stands on the issue of rape. Secondly, feminism has not been able to do well on this issue in its origin countries. West has much higher rapes per capita than India, almost to the tune of 1000%. So if feminism is the antidote to the problem of rape, why does the west have such high numbers of rapes as compared to India? In fact, all the Asian countries with strong family values and Dharmic culture from India to China to Japan have negligible per capita rapes as compared to the west. None of these countries practise the militant feminism as in the west. So the real question should be- should India export some cultural values to the west to civilize them or blindly import another western ideology when it has failed in its own society?

Conclusion

The above examples clearly show that the feminist agenda in India is driven by those sitting in the ivory towers, the people who have little to no understanding of the ground realities of India. Given how feminism has failed the western countries and created a permanent wall between the two sexes, India should be very careful in importing these cultural memes which will destroy its family system thus paving the way for it to become a failed society. Thankfully the common people are much smarter than the local feminists and very well understand that destruction of family system will wreak havoc on their lives specially when there are no social security nets in this country.

Image credits:
Why India needs Feminism bullshit?

June 11, 2016
India does not have a rape culture, West does

There has been a lot of debate and opinion pieces lately in Indian and western media on how India is a dangerous place for women, lambasting the rape culture of India. The critics use the Nirbhaya rape case from Delhi as an example and use it to broad-brush all Indian men as rapists. While no society is above criticism, such criticism should be well deserved and one incident should not be extrapolated to pass moral judgements on the whole society. So let’s dig deep and see whether international rape statistics support this horrendous claim propagated by international newspapers.

Contextual replacement image. The original embedded media could not be recovered; this image does not reproduce the original dataset or copyrighted frame.

Number of rape incidents per 100,000 citizens in different countries

Above are the statistics for reported rape rates per 100,000 population around the world. As seen from the above figure, it is pretty clear that India ranks at the bottom when it comes to rapes against women. India has 1.8 rapes per 100k as opposed to rape rates of 132 in Sweden, 26 in the USA or 28 in UK per 100k citizens. So it is pretty clear that India is actually 15 times better than USA or UK when it comes to reported rape cases. Yet these western critics and their local sepoys in the media have no qualms claiming India has a rape culture while giving a free pass to the western rape problem. The perfect example of such an attitude is reflected by the actions of Leslee Udwin who flew all the way from UK to make a documentary on the Nirbhaya rape case and lump all Indian men as rapists and trash Indian culture — while completely ignoring that the rape crisis is 15 times worse in her home country.

One of the common criticisms against the above statistic is that there are large numbers of unreported rape cases in India and that we cannot use it for comparison with western nations. But even if we go with the argument that Indian rapes are 90% under-reported and USA rapes are reported 100%, it would still mean India only has a rape rate of 18 per 100,000 as opposed to 26 per 100,000 in the USA — and so USA rape rates will still be 50% higher than India’s. Also, other crime rates per capita in India like homicide or theft are much lower than other countries in general, and so it should not be surprising that rape rates are also substantially lower in India.

Others cite Indian rape definitions as different from western definitions of rape and how western countries have a broader rape definition. But this argument cuts both ways. For example, Indian law stipulates that consensual sex under promise of marriage is rape if the man later changes his mind on marriage. No western country has such laws on rape. Furthermore, rape is a complicated term in India because more than 50% of reported rape cases are “proven” false — not just unproven cases. More than 53% of the rape cases in India are filed by girls’ parents on the boyfriend in cases where the couple elopes and the girl later changes her mind. So the actual rape rates will be much lower than the reported cases.

On further analysis, the claim about broader rape definition in the west compared to India turns out even more problematic. The US definition for rape is exactly as India’s except on marital rape — a highly contentious issue. Considering the case where we take marital rape out of the USA’s rape statistics, it would still leave India far behind. The USA has a reported marital rape rate of 10% out of total rapes. So if we remove 10% of 26 reported rapes in USA to correct for marital rapes, it would still be 23 per 100k population — still 12 times higher than the reported rape rate of 1.8 per 100k in India. Even if we make the assumption that India has 90% unreported rapes, India’s rape rate would only be 18 per 100k and would still be 30% lower than the rape rate of USA. Indian rape statistics are lower than USA even if we inflate the Indian rape statistics by 1000%.

The Indian rape rate can be demonstrated to be lower even from third-party data sources like British tourism data on rapes of British women visiting foreign countries — and here we have no excuse that rapes are under-reported specifically in India, since these cases were reported by British women to British officials and Embassies. Nearly 8 lakh Britishers had visited India and none of them were raped — as opposed to Spain, where 53 rapes were reported. What is important to note is that for two consecutive years no rapes were reported from India, and so India did not just get lucky in one particular year.

Why India has low rates of rape?

In India, women are seen as sacred and protected with the life of men if needed. Indian society actually gives more importance to the safety of women than western societies. This is why there are many places in India where a woman’s honour is considered far more important than her life. As many Hindus will say, a man who kills a woman is just killing her body, while a man raping her destroys her soul. This is why we Indians feel obliged to protect women better and strive to lower the present rape rate even further. Similar cultural aspects can be corroborated by visiting any jail in India where rapists usually bear the brunt of other criminals and are ostracised for their heinous act. Such behaviour of criminals explains well why any normal Indian, who has much better civic and moral sense than criminals, morally abhors the concept of rape. Even though rape laws are misused to the tune of 50%+ in India, the protests and demands to strengthen rape laws post the Nirbhaya incident only bolster the claim that Indian opinion is strictly against any culture of condoning rapes.

So why this fear mongering by the western media on rape culture in India?

This fear mongering in the western media on India goes back to the old days of colonialism where they considered it their duty to “civilise” Indians and other brown and black people. This holier-than-thou attitude is nothing more than an imperialistic tool for these hypocrites to “civilise” us even when our society is more civilised. Despite chronic poverty, Indian society has a very low crime rate and similarly lower rapes. India has a marital success rate of 95%+ as opposed to 50% in the west. The single mother percentage is 1% compared to 40–50% in the west. So instead of trying to teach us how to live civilly, western media will do much better by simply cleaning their own house, which is leading to many societal problems.

We will now give a few examples to show how the western media is completely complicit in covering up the big sex rackets and scandals in their own countries. If a Rotterdam-style grooming, sex and rape racket had been busted in India instead of UK, the whole world would have issued travel advisories against India — but nothing of the sort happened against UK. The complete failure of authorities to act against Pakistani immigrants who abused some 1,400 young girls between 1997 and 2013 is a glaring example of the failure of western society. Another incident corresponds to the cover-up in Westminster paedophilia cases where big UK politicians were involved in raping young children. The double standards of western media are very apparent as all these incidents are passed off as rare incidents, unlike the hype built around the Nirbhaya incident.

To summarize: yes, India needs to protect her women better and no woman should be made to go through the horrors of rape. But it is time for Indians to stop listening to the racism-inspired rancour of the west and fall for the false media-generated hype to denounce the whole culture based on a few incidents. The evidence presented above clearly suggests that it is actually the west which has a big rape problem and needs immediate social attention to alleviate this problem.

January 17, 2016