My blog

Tag: Suicide

  • Equal rights is fine but what about unequal fights?

    Equal rights is fine but what about unequal fights?

    What happens when you rob a man of his dignity and his life? Someone someday will take a drastic step, lose his mind and go on a killing spree. After all, if you ruin a man’s life to the point where there is nothing left to live for, well, he can surely take a few lives with him as revenge. One must not take so much advantage of someone just because one isn’t saying anything. We are talking about men in current India to make you realize that it is not far from truth. What has brought about this sad state of affairs? Short sightedness of legislature and judiciary. To give an example-

    Rohit is a psychiatrist and runs a suicide prevention help line. He got a call from one guy in jail and went to meet him. He told that his wife registered a case on him for divorce and maintenance. So the judge fixed an amount but the total income of the guy is less than the amount payable in maintenance. Since he could not afford to pay it now he is jailed for not paying the maintenance. Not surprisingly, he is now contemplating suicide.

    Such cases as reported by Rohit are widespread but do not get enough coverage and get drowned in the feminist hysteria, except generating some coverage on inside pages of local newspapers, where no one bothers to pay heed.

    Man leaves suicide video blaming wife n in-laws, says ws threatened n harassed with a false #498A , parents torturedhttps://t.co/TFNKloH8Nu

    — Deepika Bhardwaj (@DeepikaBhardwaj) August 31, 2016

    What is the solution out of this mess? With changing times, men must update their attitude about relationships and marriages and see it the way women see it- a contract made for self interest. Currently, once someone’s marriage gets fixed he starts building air castles about what will happen on honeymoon, while the girl’s family starts doing financial calculation about how their daughter gets upward social/economic mobility just by marrying (female hypergamy).

    The popular narrative tells men that dowry is evil but is silent on how women (and their families) hunt grooms? They roam with calculators in their hand! The primary motivating factors for them are “Mumbai/Delhi mein khudka ghar hai? (Does the man own an apartment)”, “1BHK/2BHK?”, “does the groom have any other claimants on the property, like brother?”, “ladka kitna kamata hai?(How much does the boy earn?)” etc. The institution of arranged marriage is nothing but legalized prostitution these days where parents sell their daughter to the highest bidder and have the guts to lecture ‘society’ that dowry is evil. What is this mythical ‘society’ they keep ranting about? Aren’t women a part of the same society?

    Compare their cold and calculating attitude to the callous attitude of men while hunting for wives, all they see is “ladki dikhne mein theek hai? Ok, kardo shadi (Is the girl decent looking? Ok, lets marry)”. Anyway it’s inappropriate for the guy to lay claim on the girl’s property, neither socially nor legally. It is impossible to get her property even after her parents die, or if you divorce and become jobless and she has job, she never has to pay maintenance. The feminazis failed to get it legislated but the next bill will give claim to wife on husband’s inherited property post divorce. So basically the onus of a failed relationship and its economic implications are put squarely on the man, while the woman has ZERO liability in such an alliance. Go big or go home but no loss. When a girl’s family says that they got a good groom, what they mean is they found a wealthy groom, so if X is better than Y then it can be proved with objective data that X has more money than Y. Can a guy do similar calculations? What does he mean when X bride is better than Y bride? Do men even have objective parameters to judge on a scale of ‘better’? They consider themselves lucky just because someone is marrying them.

    Men must start exploring proper options like pre-nuptials, hiring detective to see if there are any other Feminazis in the girl’s family who have given divorce to their husband and stolen 50% of his property. ANY red flag, ANY, just say no. It’s time men start thinking with their heads. No one goes to buy a new car and think “what are my insurance options if this new car gets into an accident” because we are all wishful thinkers and assume the best possible scenario, but when the accident happens, they realize that in their happiness to buy a new car they didn’t read the fine print and cannot claim any respite once an accident takes place. It is the same callous attitude men in India have towards marriage. No one realistically thinks about bad scenarios at the time of marriage- what if this doesn’t work out? What are my legal/economic liabilities? What is my plan B?

    Men need to start becoming more cunning. The world is a scary place filled with vultures who want to take everything that you have (the very reason they made any association with you is because of what you HAVE, not because of who you are) so once you stop having what you have (by losing a job/business/accident/disease) then the same girl who thought it made sense to be with you earlier makes the calculation that it doesn’t make sense to be with you now. It is these ‘sensible’ people who are the most poisonous and we keep hunting for demons under our beds.

    The idea of marriage was offered to men under the premise that after evaluating the pros and cons, it had a net positive effect on everyone. Steadily, over the years the dividends which men receive from this institution has eroded and it is increasingly becoming a liability. It used to be a package deal where you got companionship, children, sex, and a friend to grow old with, but now with the new laws and corporate lifestyle, all of that has been jeopardized. There’s no companionship as the husband and wife work in different offices and hardly see each other daily, sex is non-existent (or as per the whims of the lady, and now that they are clamouring to introduce marital rape bill, more fake rape cases will ensue to blackmail husbands). Kids? Well, once there is a divorce, the court take away the kids and gives them to the wife! And old age? You will spend old age as an old man filled with regrets, no companionship, no kids, no retirement pension, paying maintenance to your wife. Where is the benefit to men to get into such a one sided arrangement where the onus of a failed relationship is completely on one gender?

    Now a days, if you are an upper middle class man, the fact that you marry only means that you have pledged your wealth to a stranger unilaterally where she has no reciprocal obligations whatsoever. The concept of household chores is non-existent as there are washing machines and house maids. So even if the wife is a house wife, her status is that of a highly pampered house cat. She adds no value to the alliance in any way compared to what she gets to legally claim in return (your entire property). Going out and marrying is like going to the mall and buying trouble with your hard earned money.

    On the other hand, the women, by marrying, immediately become legally entitled to lay claim on the husband’s property and immediately achieve social/economic mobility. The husband’s real estate is multiple times of what she would earn from her job anyway. It’s the woman who gets everything in a conventional marriage scenario and no matter how shrill the Feminists are, they aren’t ready to forfeit this benefit of caricaturing the man in the role of a provider. The more he is capable of providing, the better man he is considered. How come no Feminists are crying objectification now?One just needs to look at west to realize how a failed marriage society will look like. They have disintegrated this ‘package deal’ that marriage offers and relegated each of its constituent elements to different sources. There, when the men want companionship? They join hobby clubs and meet like minded people. When they want intellectual conversations, they talk to people in their office or on the internet. They want sex?, They arrange it yourself through ‘various means’ including pick up artistry (free casual pump and dump sex which oddly is opposed by their own feminist) and fuck a new girl each weekend. when they want to have the feeling of fulfilment of raising a child? They adopt an orphan or 10 and sponsor their education. When they want safety and security in retirement? They buy a house at a prime area from all the money saved and lead a comfortable life, which arguably is a way better choice there since their chances of good old age life is better if they are single and unmarried and hence not screwed by their legal system where they get robbed of their properties and earnings in the name of divorces and maintainance. Even the hospitals have become like 5-start hotels. If you are sick in old age and pay them enough, they will keep you like a king till you die. Men there don’t need a wife or kids for that (or they will still have 10 adopted kids who might help them in old age). The laws pushed down the throat of men in their feminazi society has ensured that the above combination is FAR better than the prospect of marrying a woman in 20s, and then have a sexless bitter life with a false marital rape case filed against them once their wife lose interest in them, while their house and money and kids are taken away while leading the life of a single uncle and waiting to die and nothing to look forward to!

    The above scenario is well exemplified by the movements like PUA and MGTOW in the west. Their society is already at a point where majority men don’t marry and leave their women (even the normal non-feminist feminine women) stranded with a cat with their shrinking ovaries with nothing to look forward to except cat piss in their future. While men are learning to cope up with anti-men society, it is actually the women who end up as sore losers and cat ladies in the end. Since men no longer want to marry feminazis, the shrill feminazis then raked up the old patriarchal quote and ask men “To Man Up”. The irony is that despite all these impediments that men face, it is the women who keep claiming perpetual victim hood.

    The above decadent situation which is prevalent in west today, has reached the current decadent state wasn’t reached overnight and was reached by decades of unopposed march by feminism and mindless women pampering by their politicians and judiciary which thought men had no issues in marital life and only women had issues and pampered their women without thinking through the consequences for their actions. While not every women might have supported feminism or “women’s rights” march and the laws screwing the men there, they inevitably let their feminist crazy sisters to shout over the rooftop and let the laws screw their men. Now it is the same women, who might not even be feminists themselves but are made to pay the price for such anti-male laws there with singledom, cat piss and dog shit. Feminists who pushed for such laws are actually happy for it since why would an already lesbian, anti-male and all sex is rape hippy care that other normal women are getting left alone without companionship?

    This is not to say that women don’t face atrocities in India. Many women in rural areas are getting physically abused and killed by their in-laws, but that sample set has no connection to the modern urban educated woman working in a corporate job. Urban Feminazis appropriating victim-hood on the behalf of their rural counterparts whom they have never even met and claiming more and more concessions is nothing but crude opportunism. It’s like Anil ambani saying “my driver didn’t have breakfast today so I must eat 2 extra burgers on his behalf to compensate for it”.

    So the only advice to men and their sisters and mothers is to avoid the dynamite of failed marriage by properly filtering out any signs of feminism when they look for a bride. Unless the Indian society wakes up to this challenge, it too will end up with failed marriages and unhappy cat ladies like in the west, while men look the other side and ignore them. This will be especially true for women in India as well. The price for feminism and it’s cat ladies of the west is paid for by both feminist and non-feminists alike in the west. The percentage of women who identify as feminists is at an all time low of 27% in USA and still the percentage of women who manage to get a husband is only 30-40%. This is why women against feminism is gaining ground there. But it is a step too late and too little. Their society is already dying and their women are already miserable. Women of India should women up and stand up to the braindead white wannabe Indian feminazis, for if they don’t stand up to this judicial trampling of men by courts and society on the advice of white wannabe feminists, it is not just their brothers and sons who are going to be destroyed, but their own lives along with their sisters and daughters as well. It is about time Indians stop this blond white wannabeness and start learning from the mistakes the dying and decadent west made.

  • Why dalits should stay away from suicidal leftist politics

    Editorial illustration for Why dalits should stay away from suicidal leftist politics
    Editorial illustration for “Why dalits should stay away from suicidal leftist politics”.

    The recent suicide of Rohit Vemula, a student at Hyderabad University, has taken the country by storm. The popular narration peddled by the media is that the poor student was pushed to commit suicide due to discriminatory action by the university administration in response to political vandalism exhibited by Vemula and his peers associated with Ambedkar Students Association (ASA). To summarize, Vemula and five other students were expelled from the university after beating up another fellow student and later the punishment was reduced to expulsion from hostel. Since then, these students were protesting against university action and probably under stress. Post suicide, the ASA, media and other political parties are trying to bring in a Dalit angle to this incident by complaining that students were given harsh punishment due to their Dalit identity — a fact which is debatable.

    In the following paragraphs, we will not be dissecting this particular incident but talk specifically about how Ambedkar would have been pained by his name being used by anti-national and anti-Dalit organizations like ASA and Ambedkar Periyar Study Circle (APSC). More importantly, we will throw some light on how Dalit politics is hijacked by anti-national leftists and Marxists in India and why Dalits and specifically SC/ST and OBC students should stay away from the politics of such organizations. Under the garb of Dalit identity, these organizations headed by upper caste Hindus (check yourself that top leaders of left parties like CPI(M) etc. are almost always Brahmins or upper castes) want to exploit the fault lines present in Hindu society to further their own agenda and trap poor Dalit students in ugly college level politics.

    First, let me ask a few questions about history to get started. Who was the prominent Hindu leader in favour of partition of India before Congress succumbed under Jinnah’s pressure? Who was the prominent leader who wanted proper population exchange at the time of partition and thought without total population exchange Hindus will get a bad deal? Who was the leader who recognised the true destructive nature of Islam that we fail to acknowledge even today after seeing events like Malda and Muzzafarnagar? The answer to all the above questions is Ambedkar. Among the idealists and other crazy national leaders, Ambedkar was one of the few rational thinkers and realists in 1947.

    Post-independence, Ambedkar has been digested by the left and his legacy has been reduced to a Dalit thinker. This has been done because Ambedkar’s views were vehemently against Abrahamics (both Islam and Christianity) and state control of the economy. These other identities of Ambedkar have been carefully suppressed by the leftist intelligentsia — and this is one of the reasons that most celebrated Dalit intellectuals today, who are promoted by the media and universities like JNU, demand government control of the economy and side with Abrahamics wherever possible.

    Ambedkar’s opinion about Islam is as hard-hitting today as it was 70 years ago. In his book on partition of India, he wrote:

    According to Muslim Canon Law the world is divided into two camps, Dar-ul-Islam (abode of Islam) and Dar-ul-Harb (abode of war). A country is Dar-ul-Islam when it is ruled by Muslims. A country is Dar-ul-Harb when Muslims only reside in it but are not rulers of it. That being the Canon Law of the Muslims, India cannot be the common motherland of the Hindus and the Musalmans. It can be the land of the Musalmans — but it cannot be the land of the Hindus and the Musalmans living as equals…

    — B.R. Ambedkar, The Partition of India

    No surprise that in the last few years of his life, when Ambedkar lost hope of reforming Hindus, he chose to convert to Buddhism — another Dharmic religion — instead of joining the fold of Abrahamics. Ambedkar had written and clearly presented evidence that caste and other evil Hindu practices were equally present in Islam and Christian converts, and so conversion to these cults served no purpose. On top of that, these religions separate the individual from his roots by carefully planting the seeds of extra-territorial allegiance towards Mecca and Rome. So Ambedkar perfectly envisaged that conversion to Abrahamic cults would lead to destruction of Indic civilization.

    Looking at the above views of Ambedkar, it is no surprise that the Marxist cabal reduced Ambedkar to a mere Dalit icon. Ambedkar’s image has been used to fuel anti-caste sentiment and promote hatred towards Hinduism rather than reduce casteism from Indian society. Rather than promoting native Dalit intellectual and Dalit entrepreneurship associations like DICCI, Dalits are sold the narrative of victimhood by anti-national rabble-rousers like ASA and APSC and their parent organizations which often follow Marxist ideology.

    These parent organizations are usually headed by upper caste elites who want to exploit the fault lines in Hinduism and align with Muslims and Christians to maintain their hegemony. They do not have the best interest of Dalits but use them as mere pawns and cannon fodder in this political game. Does it come as a surprise that in 40 years that CPI ruled Bengal, the CPI Politburo had no Dalit members? Does it come as a surprise that for every Kancha Ilaiah, there are hundreds of Rajdeep Sardesai-style upper caste anti-nationals? When the shit hits the fan, Dalits will always be the first victims and at the receiving end of Muslim atrocities as evidenced from daily events in West Bengal. Given this scenario, Dalits should reject this poison sold by snake oil salesmen in the media and intelligentsia.

    Given the analysis above, we can now analyse the current suicide as part of a bigger narrative being built in different parts of India to exploit Dalit identity. This suicide can be traced back to the protest held by these Dalit students against the hanging of Yakub Menon, a proven terrorist. It should not come as a surprise that these Dalits had been brainwashed to such an extent that their protest reflected the anti-territorial affinities usually shown only by hardcore Abrahamics or anti-national apologists.

    So, what is the way forward for Dalits? Dalit students should try to stay away from politics and focus on their education, as the free market is their best bet to fight caste discrimination and reform Hindu society. For the politically motivated ones who want to enter student politics, they should realise that leftist jholachaps have little to offer them except false victimhood. They need to realise that a stronger and united India is more in the interest of Dalits than the current generation of upper caste rulers and intelligentsia, who want to consolidate power by playing divide and rule. Only when Dalits realise and neutralise this nefarious design can they claim the legacy of Ambedkar and fulfil his dream of creating a strong and just India.

    References:

    The Partition of India — B.R. Ambedkar

  • India should stop turning criminals like Rohit into martyrs

    India should stop turning criminals like Rohit into martyrs contextual illustration
    Contextual editorial illustration for the restored article.

    It is disgusting to watch news and look at the way presstitutes are handling the suicide of a terrorist-sympathising anti-national college hooligan just because he belongs to a lower caste. Rohit Vemula and his fellow leftist hooligans had organised a protest inside the campus in support of the terrorist Yakub Menon, who was responsible for bombing more than 200 people in the Mumbai terrorist attacks. When some students in his college wrote on Facebook exposing these anti-national students, he and his fellow leftist hooligans beat up those students. The students who were the actual victims of the hooliganism of this guy and his fellow thugs complained to the college management about this misbehaviour. Taking strict action, the college management then suspended this group of thugs for goondaism inside college premises.

    But for obvious reasons the media presstitutes have chosen to completely ignore the sequence of events that led to the suicide of this anti-national thug and are now painting a false picture of a poor Dalit student getting uneven treatment by an upper caste university management — because telling the truth would not help their anti-national agenda. What’s worse is that they are now trying to pin the blame of suicide on the Vice Chancellor of the university, who in all fairness was more than generous in handling this issue. This reasoning is ridiculous but then again did we ever expect sane arguments from the leftist anti-nationals?

    Firstly, it is difficult to force anyone to commit suicide. Trying to push the narrative that this anti-national thug was forced into suicide by the VC is just ridiculous. The only people who could have vested interest in Rohit’s suicide are his other fellow suspended comrades or the Ambedkar Students Association (ASA) — the organization behind the protest in support of Yakub Menon. They are the ones who are now getting cheap publicity by this episode. This sequence of events is similar to the suicide that was staged at Kejriwal’s rally a year ago. Secondly, the guy in question is not innocent by any means and his punishment was not out of proportion to what he did. In fact, the management was lenient when he was left with just expulsion from hostel instead of expelling him and his fellow hooligans from college outright.

    Supporting terrorism and indulging in hooliganism is not innocence. Being a Dalit does not give leeway to engage in anti-national activities nor does it give anyone any right to indulge in rowdyism inside college. In fact what the VC did was actually very mild compared to what this anti-national deserved — he and his fellow anti-nationals should have been expelled from college instead of being expelled just from the hostel for beating up other students. But no, for some reason his Dalit identity is given as an excuse for his anti-national activities and the media presstitutes want us to overlook this misbehaviour.

    This is unacceptable behaviour from the media as well as the students now engaged in protest. And as usual, all the anti-national politicians from Kejriwal to Rahul Gandhi are ganging up to visit this thug’s funeral and turn him into some sort of hero. As a society, how does it make sense to turn an anti-national rowdy into a hero post suicide? And where were these Dalit-saving brigades including Rahul Gandhi and Kejriwal when Dalit houses and shops were burnt in Malda and Dalit Hindus were forced out of their homes?

    We will go further and say that the students who are currently protesting against the VC for his action against the anti-national Rohit Vemula are just supporting an anti-national unlawful rowdy masquerading as a student. Such students should be strictly punished — with suspension and expulsion if necessary — so that such anti-national politics are not condoned in the future. Our government should make it very clear that no one has any right to indulge in any anti-national activity and caste identity does not give a free pass for such behaviour.

    Any leniency on the students protesting in favour of the anti-national rowdy will only set a bad precedent for such anti-national goondaist activities inside the universities and will lead to further worsening of law and order and the academic environment. The government needs to nip this nuisance in its bud. We don’t want all our universities to turn into anti-national factories like JNU. One JNU is more than enough to fulfil our suicidal tendency of supporting anti-national ideologies.

    Originally published January 19, 2016 on Yuga Parivartan.