The rising awareness about the Muslim demographic bomb is causing sleepless nights for most well-informed Hindus — something that gets highlighted every time there is a mass exodus of Hindus from Muslim-majority areas, like in the case of Kairana recently. There are many strategies to counter this demographic siege, and maintaining high TFR is one of them. But as soon as any realist Hindu advocates high Hindu TFR to counter Muslim growth, one gets bombarded by various psychological defence arguments from those who are happy with the current low-investment and individual narcissistic scenario. Here are the different types of arguments given against Hindus counter-breeding Muslims in India — arguments which hardly stand close scrutiny:
People giving this excuse have buried their heads in the sand so deep that it is almost impossible to wake them up. No logical arguments can budge a person engaged in such levels of escapism. Any careful look at the map of India and the population of young Jihadis (oops — Muslims!) can clear this point without doubt.
This argument is again given by those who are steeped in naivety. If Hindu politics had been on top of its game, no one would be discussing the Muslim fertility bomb in the first place. But the fact is, Hindus live in a hostile country where Hinduphobia is very real. Control of politics should be an aim for the long run, but given the uncertainty on this issue, losing demographic superiority will only make it more difficult in the future. Moreover, increasing Hindu TFR is never a standalone measure and needs to be coupled with all other available options. Kicking out Bangladeshis is very important but it would not solve the problem completely — 15% of the population will still remain to fight this demographic war through the womb. Look at the so-called progressive heaven of Kerala, where Muslim women regularly outperform both Hindu and Christian women. The need is to simultaneously pursue all strategies: increase TFR, kick out BDs, and try to get hold of power.
This is the point of attack of entitled Hindu feminists who are trying hard to separate the fate of Hindu women from Hindu men. Whenever riots strike, while men are killed, women are forced to bear bigger costs. The rape and enslavement stories of Yezidi girls should send shivers down the spine of any normal person. So the fate of Hindu men and women are not separate — they will swim or sink together. Losing demographic superiority will only increase Muslim numbers, thus increasing the likelihood of crimes against women. The real question becomes — who represents the interests of Hindu women better? Those sold to liberalism who only want to enjoy their lives, or those who can look into the future and see the fate of future Hindu women? Having more children would mean women will be out of the workforce for longer — which again means men have to slog out more for maintaining the same standard of living. It is not just a sacrifice on the part of women but also men. It is only in the feminist mind that the fate of the two sexes is different — in the real world, it is intertwined.
This is one of the most stupid responses on this issue. Some people even questioned whether TFR increase now could have helped those who were forced to flee Kairana. Well, given the environment in Kairana today, increased TFR will not change reality tomorrow. But had the Hindus in Kairana maintained a high TFR in the past 4–5 decades, it would have been much more difficult to dilute their numbers. TFR is a long-term strategy — demographic surplus in many areas has lulled Hindus into inaction. Any sane person would understand that violence should be the last resort in any conflict, and keeping demographic surplus would allow Hindus to solve this issue at the right moment.
Kids are expensive and there are no doubts about it. But this is another typical argument to chicken out of the situation. While Muslims have internalized the issue, Hindus still engage in the quality vs. quantity debate. Fact is, many Hindus have gone below replacement levels of TFR. In many regions — specially South India — Hindus are having less than 2 kids, while for maintaining population they need 2.1 kids per woman. There is no other way to put this: rich people prefer to have fewer kids to decrease their responsibilities even though they could afford them much more easily than poor. Western couples have no impeding demographic threat — Hindus have bought into this liberalism idea which is almost suicidal. The only question is: will they take up this challenge?
Hindus have to wake up now or their fate will go from bad to worse in the coming years. If Hindus don’t wake up and keep pretending that crucial factors like TFR do not matter, then they will have to face what Bengali Hindus are facing now in Bangladesh — and West Bengal. Bengali Hindus kept singing “all is well” and lost demography to Muslims in the 1880s due to low TFR, chanting their liberal secular nature and quality-over-quantity mantra. The quality kids produced by Bengali secular Hindus are of no use against the barbaric hordes motivated by a death cult with a divine mandate to rape kaffirs. So Hindus need to decide whether they are going to be pragmatic and real, and learn now to start counter-breeding — or listen to TFR deniers and let their future quality children and grandchildren be at the mercy of barbaric hordes.
